Newspaper History of Petersfield
(1800-1819)

1800

14-Apr-1800
Sussex Advertiser
LEWES, April 14.

 Last Friday the 23rd regiment of foot, stationed at Battle, received their route to march, in three divisions, from that place to Tavistock, where they are to follow such orders as they shall receive from the General commanding the western district.
 The first division, consisting of four companies, marched on Saturday for Hailsham and adjacents, and are to arrive here on this day. On Tuesday morning they are to proceed on their march, by the following route; Shoreham and adjacents, Arundel, Chichester and suburbs, Petersfield, Winchester, Romsey, Salisbury and adjacents, Shaftesbury, Sherborne and Milbourne-Port, Crewkhorn, Chard, Honiton, Exeter, Oakhampton, and Tavistock, where they are to arrive on the 5th of May.
 The other two divisions, consisting of three companies each, follow by the same route. They are to be stationed, for a short time, one division at Oakhampton, and the other at Exeter. They expect, soon after their arrival at the above places, that the whole regiment will be ordered to Plymouth.


26-May-1800
Reading Mercury

 Yesterday the King held a Levee at St. James’s Palace, when the following loyal Addresses were presented:—From the town of Portsea; the borough of Cricklade; the towns of Warwick and Petersfield; … all of which were most graciously received.


2-Jun-1800
Hampshire Telegraph
HOME NEWS
PORTSMOUTH
SATURDAY, JUNE 7.

 Wednesday being his Majesty’s birthday, the whole of the regular, militia, and volunteer forces in this district, assembled on Portsdown Hill, under the command of Major-General Whitelocke, in the following order:—

 It was near half-past eleven before all the troops had arrived on the ground. The whole were formed, in the first instance, in a column of troops and companies; the guns of the royal artillery on the right and left of the line, and the volunteer artillery in the centre; the line of infantry being taken up by the respective corps, according to their seniority.—On the firing of the first gun, the whole were formed in line; and on the discharge of the second gun gave a general salute. Different guns were discharged, as had been previously arranged, to denote the order of firing: after the 9th had gone off, the whole line made ready and presented in the air, previous to the feu de joye, the cavalry with their pistols beginning the fire, and the infantry and guns on the right and left of the line following. After which the men and officers took off their hats, and on the discharge of the 10th gun gave three cheers, in honour of the day. Another gun was then fired, when the line were thrown into columns of troops and companies, as at first, and after saluting the general, proceeded to their respective quarters.—There were 10,000 troops on the ground, and the alacrity and zeal they displayed on the occasion, fully merited the high encomiums which were paid them by the general and other officers who were present. The concourse of spectators was greater than could possibly be expected, and the weather being fine, it was a most pleasing sight, highly gratifying to the breast of every loyal Briton!


1801

27-Jun-1801
Morning Post
MARRIED

 On Saturday last, Mr. Hoper, of Great Marlborough-street, to Miss Andrews, of Petersfield.

1802

25-Jan-1802
Hampshire Telegraph

 Sir Joseph Eyles, Knt. Captain, in the Royal Navy, was elected on Monday last, Mayor of Petersfield, for the year ensuing.


8-Feb-1802
Hampshire Chronicle

 Thursday morning a detachment of the Guards consisting of 150 men, landed at the Sally Port, Portsmouth, from the l’Egytienne; several of them appeared blind, having bandages tied round their eyes. Another detachment of the Staff landed in the afternoon, and marched for Petersfield on their route to town.


William Jolliffe dies

6-Mar-1802
Carlisle Journal
DIED

 On Saturday morning, about six o’clock, Mr. Jolliffe, M.P. for Petersfield. His death was owing to an accident. Mr. Jolliffe had been a long time previously employed in inspecting some improvements on his estate at Mitcham, in Surrey. On Friday, he went into a field adjoining the house, where a number of labourers were employed in digging; whilst walking, not observing a pit near, he fell in, and unfortunately broke the spine of his back, and fractured his skull in several places. He laid a short time in that situation; but assistance being near, he was conveyed to his house, where, after languishing in extreme torture until Sunday, he then expired.


12-Mar-1802
Kentish Weekly Post or Canterbury Journal

 On Sunday morning last was interred with great funeral pomp in the family vault, at Merstham, in Surrey, the remains of the late William Jolliffe, esq. M.P. for Petersfield. The body, which had lain in state some days, was conveyed to the Church in a hearse, decorated with escutcheons, &c. preceded by all his tenantry, in full mourning, on horseback; then plumes, banners, and his favourite horse, properly caparisoned for the melancholy occasion. The hearse was followed by eight coaches and six, in which were his two sons and others of his family, and particular friends. Many of his neighbouring gentry, and other inhabitants, closed the procession, and appeared very sensibly affected; and his numerous dependants seemed to feel how great a loss they had sustained. The Church was hung with black cloth on the mournful occasion. The Pall-bearers were, Lord Grantley, the Hon. General Norton, Sir John Frederick, Lieutenant-Colonel Boyce, Mr. East and Mr. Rock.


29-Mar-1802
Hampshire Chronicle

 A new writ was ordered for Petersfield, in the room W. Jolliffe, Esq. deceased


Col. Hylton Jolliffe elected

5-Apr-1802
Hampshire Telegraph

 Monday an election took place at Petersfield for a Member to serve in Parliament for that Borough; when Colonel Hilton Jolliffe, of the Guards, was unanimously elected and returned; the Mayor, Sir Joseph Eyles, in a very appropriate speech complimented the Colonel on the occasion, and observed that no man could more lament the melancholy cause that had given occasion for the present election than himself, but he felt the highest satisfaction in their choice having fallen upon a descendant of the Family by whom that Borough had been repeatedly represented in Parliament, and who was not only recommended to their notice by his known attachment to the Borough, but by the many glorious battles he had fought in the rights and liberties of his country. The Colonel expressed his warmest support for the Borough. The Electors afterwards retired to the Dolphin Inn where they partook of a sumptuous dinner and spent the evening with the utmost conviviality.


6-Apr-1802
Kentish Weekly Post or Canterbury Journal

 As Mr. Jolliffe, brother to the late Member, was returning on Tuesday from the election at Petersfield, his chaise was suddenly overthrown, and his head mangled in a most alarming manner. He was conveyed the same evening to Merstham House, the seat of Colonel Jolliffe, where surgical assistance was procured with the utmost expedition.



12-Apr-1802
Hampshire Chronicle

 On Monday last, Col. H. Jolliffe, of the Guards was elected at Petersfield, to represent that borough in parliament, in the room of his relation deceased.—

24-Apr-1802
Oxford Journal

 On Monday last died Miss Elizabeth Trodd, daughter of the late Rev. Mr. Thomas Trodd, of Petersfield.


3-Jul-1802
Oxford Journal
COUNTRY FAIRS.

 SATURDAY,July 10.—Stokenchurch and Witney, Oxon; Buckingham and Iver, Bucks; Portsmouth, 14 days, Petersfield, Ringwood, and Stockbridge, Hants; and Marlborough, Wilts.

29-Jul-1802
Kentish Gazette
MEMBERS RETURNED.

Petersfield—Hilton Jolliff, esq. Sergeant Best*
Those marked * are new Members.


24-Aug-1802
Chester Courant
NEW PARLIAMENT.—MEMBERS RETURNED.

Petersfield. H. Jolliffe, * Mr. Serjeant Best.

26-Aug-1802
Derby Mercury
NEW PARLIAMENT.—MEMBERS RETURNED.

Petersfield. Hylton Jolliffe [1], Mr. Serj. W. Best. [0]


22-Nov-1802
Hampshire Telegraph

 This afternoon two Gentlemen, who were going to Petersfield in a post chaise, were robbed on Horndean down, by three fellows dressed in sailors’ habiliments.

29-Nov-1802
Hampshire Chronicle

 On Thursday was married, Mr. Newlin, of Raike, to Mrs. Wingham, of Petersfield.

 Saturday afternoon two gentlemen, who were going to Petersfield in a post-chaise, were robbed on Horndean-down, by three fellows dressed in sailors habiliments.


29-Nov-1802
Hampshire Telegraph

 DEATHS.—Last week, at Petersfield, Mr. J. Eames, grocer, and an Alderman of that Borough.


1803

29-Jan-1803
Cobbett’s Weekly Political Register

Bankrupts.—Burnett, S. Petersfield, victualler.

31-Jan-1803
Morning Post

 S. Burnett, of Petersfield, Hampshire, victualler, Feb. 14, 15, and March 12, at the Red Lion Inn, in Petersfield. Attornies, Mr. Greetham, Petersfield; and Messrs. Allen, Clifford’s-inn.


7-Feb-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
PORTSMOUTH.

 MARRIAGES.—On Saturday last, Mr. J. Diaper, jun. an eminent grocer, of this town, to Miss Binstead, daughter of —— Binstead, Esq. of Weston, near Petersfield.


28-Feb-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By Mr. PEACOCK,

 By order of the Assignees, on the Premises, on TUESDAY, the 1st day of March; 1803, and following day, ALL the HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE and EFFECTS, of SAMUEL BURNET, at the Dolphin Inn, at Petersfield, Hants, (A bankrupt) consisting of four post bedsteads, with corded, dimity, and cotton furnitures; fine goose and other feather beds; blankets, quilts, and counterpanes; chairs, mahogany tables, carpets, and looking glasses; a quantity of linen, glass, and china; boiler, roasting jack, and smoke jack; copper porridge pots, saucepans, and all sorts of kitchen requisites. About fifty dozen fine old Port, several dozen of exceeding good Sherry, Madeira, Claret, Lisbon, Brandy, Rum, and Hollands; about 500 gallons of strong beer; some bottled Porter; ten exceeding good chaise Horses and Harness; three almost new Post Chaises; a Post Coach; five Fish Carts, and various effects.
 The Sale to begin at eleven o’clock
 Catalogues may be had at the Crown, Portsmouth; Swan, Alton; Half Moon, Petworth; White Horse, Haslemere; White Lion, Guildford; Bush, Farnham; and of the Auctioneer, Godalming


28-Mar-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,

 At the Town Hall, in Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, on TUESDAY the 29th of March, 1803,
 LOT 1. TWO Hundred and Twenty-five OAK TREES, now standing and growing on a certain farm called Langrish Farm, in the parish of Eastmeon, in the occupation of Richard Veal.
 LOT 2. One hundred and forty-nine OAK TREES, now standing on a Farm called Rothercomb Farm, in the same parish of Eastmeon, in the occupation of John Windybank.
 LOT 3. Twenty small OAK TREES, in a copse called William’s Coppice in the same parish of Eastmeon.
 The above Trees are all marked and numbered.
 For further particulars apply to Mr. NEWMAN, or Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield. The Sale to begin at twelve o’clock at noon.


9-May-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
Hampshire Patent Waggon or Carts.

 Mr. JOHN ROOD, of the High-street, Portsmouth, most respectfully informs Gentlemen, Farmers, and all others having occasion for the use of Waggons and Carts, that he has a Waggon completed under the denomination of the HAMPSHIRE PATENT WAGGON or CARTS, which will, as occasion may require, answer the purpose of either Waggon or Carts, by the removal of four pins or bolts. Mr. R. also begs leave to say that it will be for the Public inspection at the Places and Times following, when every possible objection he will thankfully receive:—

 The Market, Petersfield …………………………………………Wednesday, 18th inst.


3-Jul-1803
Bell's Weekly Messenger
DIVIDENDS.

 July 25. Samuel Burnett, of Petersfield, Southampton, at twelve, at the Red Lion Inn, Petersfield.


4-Jul-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
FROXFIELD BARNETT INCLOSURE.

 WE, whose names are hereunto subscribed, being the Commissioners named and appointed in and by an Act, made and passed in the present Session of Parliament, entitled “An Act for dividing, allotting, and inclosing a Common or Waste, called Froxfield Barnett, and other Wastes, and on Commonable Lands, in the Parish of Froxfield, in the County of Southampton,’ do hereby give notice and require all Persons and Bodies Corporate or Politic, who have, or claim any Right of Common, or other Right in, to, or upon the Common, Wastes, and other Commonable Lands, by the said Act directed to be divided, allotted, and inclosed, to deliver or cause to be delivered, to us, at our next meeting, to be held at the Red Lion Inn, in the Borough of Petersfield, in the said County, on MONDAY the 25th day of July next, at eleven o’clock in the forenoon, an account or schedule, in writing, signed by them, or their respective husbands, guardians, trustees, committees, or agents, of their respective Rights or Claims, in, to, or upon the said Common, Wastes, and other Commonable Lands, and therein to describe the Lands and Grounds, and the respective Messuages, Lands, Tenements, and Heriditaments, in respect whereof they claim to be entitled to any; and which of such Rights in and upon the same Common, Wastes, and other Commonable Lands, or any part thereof, with the name or names of the Person or Persons in the actual possession thereof; and the particular computed quantities of the same respectively; and of what nature and extent such Right is; and also in what Rights and for what Estates and Interests they claim the same respectively, distinguishing the Freehold from the Copyhold or Leasehold; and on non-compliance with this notice and requisition, every Person making default herein, will, (as far only as respects any Claim so neglected to be delivered) be totally barred and excluded of and from all Right and Title, in, to, or upon the said Common, Wastes, and other Commonable Lands, by the said Act directed to be divided, allotted, and inclosed, as aforesaid, and of and from all benefit and advantage in or to any share or allotment thereof respectively, according to the directions contained in an Act of Parliament passed in the 41st year of his present Majesty’s Reign, intitled “Act Act for consolidating in one Act certain Provisions usually inserted in Acts of Inclosure, and for facilitating the mode of proving the several facts usually required on the passing of such Acts.” Given under our Hands the 20th day of June, 1803.

THOMAS JARMAN
CHARLES OSBORN
JOHN TURNER


25-Jul-1803
Hampshire Telegraph

 NOTICE is hereby given, that the Trustees for putting into execution an Act of Parliament, passed in the thirty-sixth year of his present Majesty, entitled “An Act to continue the Terms and powers of an Act passed in the twelfth year of the reign of his Majesty King George the Third, for repairing, altering, and keeping in repair, the Road from Sheet Bridge to Portsmouth, and from Petersfield to the Alton Turnpike Road near Ropley, in the County of Southampton,” will meet at the Ship and Bell Inn, Horndean, on MONDAY the 29th day of August next, at eleven o’clock in the forenoon, for the purpose of making an order for advancing the Tolls, payable at the different Gates on the said Turnpike Road, in such proportions as the said Trustees, at such meeting shall approve.

 July 16, 1803


1-Aug-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
Desirable Residence in Hampshire.

 A Capital MANSION HOUSE, with suitable Offices, and conveniency for the reception of a large and genteel family, delightfully situated within half-a-mile of Petersfield, commanding a beautiful view over an extensive lake and unbounded picturesque prospects over the adjacent country. The House has lately been much improved and put in a state of compleat repair, and is replete with conveniences; containing a spacious hall, dining room, with drawing and breakfast rooms, housekeeper’s room, butler’s pantry, servant’s hall and kitchen, five exceeding good bed rooms, with convenient closets and dressing room, and on the attic story six roomy bed chambers; the detached offices are a wash-house, dairy, granary, coach-house, stabling for eight horses, with an excellent loft over, and servant’s room. The House is situated on a dry soil, and remarkably healthy, has a lawn in front, a newly planted shrubbery, and an excellent walled-in garden, well planted with fruit trees. Distance from London 54 miles, and Portsmouth 18, several coaches daily pass through Petersfield to and from London. From 10 to 20 Acres of Land, very contiguous, may go with the House; and the whole may be Let on Lease for 3, 6, or 9 years, as may be agreed upon. The House may be seen, and further particulars known, on application to

Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield, Hants.


12-Sep-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
Portsmouth and Petersfield Turnpike Road.

 NOTICE is hereby given, That the Trustees for putting into execution an Act of Parliament passed in the 36th year of the reign of his present Majesty, entitled “An Act to continue the terms and powers of an Act passed in the 12th year of the reign of his present Majesty King George the Third, for Repairing, Altering, and Keeping in Repair, the Roads from Sheet Bridge to Portsmouth, and from Petersfield to the Alton Turnpike Road, near Ropley, in the County of Southampton,” did meet in pursuance of public notice, at the Ship and Bell Inn, Horndean, on MONDAY the 29th day of August last, for the purpose of making an order for advancing the Tolls payable at the different Gates on the said Turnpike Road, and at such Meeting ordered and directed that the Tolls payable at the different Gates on the aforesaid Turnpike Road, should from and after the 29th day of September instant be advanced and raised in manner following, viz.


12-Sep-1803
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY

 LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES, issued in the County aforesaid, from July 1st to September 8th, 1803, inclusive, pursuant to the Act of Parliament granting a Duty of 3l. 3s. on each Certificate.
(all from Petersfield)
 Andrews, R. esq.
 Binsted, Henry
 Bonham, Thomas, esq.
 Budd, Thomas
 Cannon, James
 Fleetwood, John
 Greetham, C. esq.
 Lear, George, sen.
 Lear, George, jun.
 Meeres, James
 Munday, Edward
 Patrick, Edw. Esq.
 Small, John
 Whicher, rev. J.

PETER KIRBY, Deputy Clerk of the Peace
By Order of his Majesty’s Commissioners for managing the Stamp Duties,
C. E. BERESFORD, Secretary


14-Nov-1803
Hampshire Telegraph
COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON
AND TOWN AND COUNTY OF THE TOWN OF THE SAME

 Resolved, That it appears to this Meeting to be extremely expedient that Divisional Meetings under the respective Lieutenants of Division, with the aid of the Inspectors of Hundreds and of such resident gentlemen and clergy as can make it convenient to attend, should, with as little delay as possible, be holden for the purposes of fixing on proper places for depots, temporary and permanent, to which inform persons, women and children may be removed in case of alarm, and others to which cattle, (particularly horses and draft cattle not immediately employed for military purpose, or of supply or otherwise, or for assistance in removal) may be driven; and for the more effectual and secure performance of these duties, it being essentially necessary to make arrangements for accommodation and support at the several places to be fixed upon, this Meeting appoints the undermentioned times and places in the respective divisions for the above purposes, and desires that the Central Commissary do attend the Lieutenants of Division, Inspectors, &c. at such Divisional Meetings, and be made acquainted with this order accordingly:—
 Division of Alton North and Alton South—At the Dolphin , Petersfield, Wednesday, 9th November inst.


26-Dec-1803
Morning Chronicle
From the LONDON GAZETTE, Dec. 24. 1803

 BANKRUPTS.
 Thomas. Norris, late of Petersfield, Southampton, victualler, January 16, at three, 17, at eleven, and February 4, at ten, at the Red Lion Inn, Petersfield. Attorneys, Mr. Cornthwaite John Hector, Petersfield; or, John Willshen, Grays-Inn Square, London.

31-Dec-1803
York Herald
BANKRUPTS,
With their Descriptions as in the Gazette.

 BANKRUPTS.
Thomas Norris, late of Petersfield, Southampton, victualler, dealer and chapman, January 16, at three, 17, at eleven, February 4, at ten, at the Red Lion Inn, Petersfield. Attorneys, Mr. Cornthwaite John Hector, Petersfield; Mr. John Willshen, Gray’s Inn-square, London.

1804

16-Jan-1804
Hampshire Telegraph

Petersfield, January, 1804.

 The Miss WHEATLYS, grateful for the very liberal encouragement they have received, return thanks to their numerous Friends for the same, and inform them, their SCHOOL will OPEN after the present recess, on the 23d instant, when they hope by continued assiduity, and attention to the improvement and comfort of their Pupils, to merit their further support.
 Terms - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 Guineas per Annum
 Entrance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ditto
 Parlour Boarders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 Guineas per Annum

WRITING, FRENCH, MUSIC, AND DANCING,
BY THE MOST APPROVED MASTERS.


23-Jan-1804
Hampshire Telegraph

Petersfield, January 16, 1804.

 MISS PARR’s BOARDING SCHOOL for YOUNG LADIES, will recommence MONDAY January 27th. She embraces the present opportunity of acknowledging the unremitted support she has long experienced from her numerous friends, and to assure them, that y the strictest attention to the health, morals, and improvement of pupils entrusted to her care, the will studiously endeavour to deserve its continuance.—English taught, and Pupils instructed in every branch of useful and ornamental needlework, at 16 Guineas per Annum.—Entrance, 1 Guinea.—Writing, and Arithmetic, 6s. per Quarter.—French, Music, and Dancing, on usual terms.


31-Jan-1804
Manchester Mercury
BANKRUPTS.

 Thomas Norris, late of Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, victualler, dealer and chapman, to appear Jan 16, 17 and Feb 4. at the Red Lion, at Petersfield—Attorney Mr Hector, in Petersfield.


13-Feb-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
Petersfield Association for Prosecuting Felons.

 A MEETING of the SUBSCRIBERS to this Association is fixed for WEDNESDAY the 22d day of this instant February, at the Red Lion Inn, in Petersfield, at three of the clock in the afternoon.

RICHARD ANDREWS

Treasurer to the Association

Petersfield, Feb. 7, 1804.


12-Mar-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
TIMBER.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER

 At the Town Hall, in Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, on TUESDAY the 26th of March, 1804, precisely at three o’clock in the afternoon,
 LOT 1. NINETY large and small OAK TREES, 82 of which stand on Langrish Farm, in the occupation of Richard Veal; and the remaining 8 on Lyland’s Farm, near Petersfield, all marked and numbered.
 LOT 2. Eighty-eight ELM TREES, standing in and near Petersfield
 LOT 3. Five ASH TREES, standing on Lyland’s Farm aforesaid; and 29 LIME and CHESNUT TREES, standing in and near Petersfield, aforesaid.
 AT the same time will be sold about three acres of UNDERWOOD, well calculated for Poles, growing on Rothercomb Farm, in the occupation of John Windebank; also about 200 OAK TELLERS. Enquire of Mr. Newman, or Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield.


2-Apr-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
BRITISH FIRE OFFICE,
STRAND AND CORNHILL, LONDON.

 Charles Greetham, Petersfield


30-Apr-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
TIMBER.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By Mr. WELLER

 On WEDNESDAY the 2d of May, 1804, between the hours of six and seven in the evening, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield.
 A COPYHOLD ESTATE of INHERITANCE, comprising a House, Garden, Orchard, Barn, Stable and Gate-room, together with 25 acres of Arable Land, lying very compact in five enclosures, divided by good hedge rows, with some young thriving timber, situate at Froxfield, three miles from Petersfield, and about half a mile out of the Turnpike Road, and is now in the occupation of Mr. Robert Singleten, whose term expires at Michaelmas next.—The Land Tax is redeemed. The Tenant will shew the Estate, and further particulars may be known by applying to  Mr. WELLER

At his General Agency Office, Chichester.


7-May-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
Froxfield, Barnett.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,

 At the Red Lion Inn, in the Borough of Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, on WEDNESDAY, the 16th day of May, 1804, at four o’clock in the afternoon, (under the authority of the Act for Inclosing the Froxfield Barnett and other Waste Lands in the Parish of Froxfield) in eight Lots,
 The following PARCELS of LAND, Part of the Froxfield Barnett:
 Lot 1. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing by estimation, 12 A. 2 R. 19 P. bounded on the north by Prior’s Dean Common, on the south by the Turnpike Road leading from Petersfield to Alton, on the east by a road to Colemore, and on the west by Lot 2.
 Lot 2. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing, by estimation, 12 A. 0 R. 37 P. bounded on the north by Prior’s Dean Common, on the south by the said Turnpike Road, on the east by Lot 1, and on the west by a road leading to Colemore.
 Lot 3. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing by estimation, 20 A. 0 R. 22 P. bounded on the north by Colemore Common, on the south by the said Turnpike Road, on the east by the road leading to Colemore, and on the west by Lot 4.
 Lot 4. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing, by estimation, 20 A. 3 R. 30 P. bounded on the north and west parts by Colemore Common, on the south by the said Turnpike Road and on the east by Lot 3.
 Lot 5. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing by estimation, 22 A. 0 R. 21 P. bounded on the north by the said Turnpike Road, on the south by the allotment of the Rev. Charles Gore, on the east by Lot 6, and on the west by the allotment of the Lord Bishop of Winchester.
 Lot 6. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing by estimation, 11 A. 1 R. 31 P. bounded on the north by the said Turnpike Road, on the south by the allotment of Messrs. White and Marsh, on the east by the road leading to Colemore, and on the west by Lot 5.
 Lot 7. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing by estimation, 24 A. 3 R. 25 P. bounded on the north by the said Turnpike Road, on the south by the allotments of Messrs. Stevens and Thomas Silvester, on the east by Lot 8, and on the west by the road leading to Colemore.
 Lot 8. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture Land, containing by estimation, 21 A. 0 R. 8 P. bounded on the north by the said Turnpike Road, on the south by the allotment of Mr. William Silvester, on the east by the allotment of Henry Shawner, Esq. and on the west by Lot 7.
 The Lands above mentioned are exempt from great tithes for seven years, contain together 146 acres, lie in a ring fence, are capable of great improvement, and are well worthy the attention of any person desirous of having a small compact farm.—The Purchaser will be entitled to immediate possession, and to a conveyance of the several Lots in Fee Simple. The Lands lie within four miles of Petersfield, the first market town in the County. The Landlord of the Trooper public house will shew the Lots. Further particulars may be known of Mr. Jarman, Hambledon; Mr. Osbourne, Westmeon; Mr. Turner, of Linch; and    Mr. HOPKINS, Solicitor

New Alresford, Hants.


28-May-1804
Morning Chronicle
BANRUPTS.

 John Rice Kemp, late of Haslemere, Surrey, victualler, June 7, 8, and July 7, at eleven, at the George, Petersfield. Attorney, Mr. Hector, Petersfield.

29-May-1804
Chester Courant

 In consequence of the misconduct of some of the members of the Petersfield Corps of Volunteers, while under arms, an application was made by the Officers on Monday 21st to the Deputy Lieutenants acting in that district, when it appearing that three of the men were principally instrumental in the affair, they were turned out of the corps, which, we learn, has given general satisfaction to the remaining members. Too much praise cannot be given to the officers for their spirited conduct upon the occasion.


30-May-1804
London Courier & Evening Gazette
BANRUPTS.

 Robert Wren, of Petersfield, Southampton, fellmonger, to surrender June 7, at 5, 8, at one, at the George, Petersfield, and July 10, at one, at the Red Lion, in Petersfield. Attornies, Mr. Cornthwaite John Hector, Petersfield; or Mr. John Willshen, Gray’s-inn-square, London


19-Jun-1804
Kentish Gazette
DIVIDENDS IN THE COUNTRY.

 July 10. Samuel Burnett, late of Petersfield, Southampton, and Godalming, Surrey, victualler.


7-Jul-1804
Oxford Journal
COUNTRY FAIRS

 TUESDAY, July 10.— Stokenchurch and Witney, Oxon; Buckingham and Iver, Bucks; Petersfield, Portsmouth, 14 days, Ringwood and Stockbridge, Hants:


16-Jul-1804
Salisbury & Winchester Journal

 LAW.—An indictment against William Draper Best, Esq. Serjeant at Law, and M. P. for Petersfield, charging him with an assault upon Rebecca the wife of James Minifie, was yesterday tried in the Court of King’s Bench. It appeared that the prosecutrix and her husband had been in good circumstances, but were much reduced; that Mrs. M. becoming entitled to the reversion of an estate, the learned Serjeant was consulted on the best means obtaining it, and the Lady in consequence made frequent visits at his chambers. At one of these visits, on the 23d of April 1802, as she deposed, he made advances of gallantry, and on her declining them, he behaved with great rudeness and violence. On her cross-examination by Mr. Garrow, she admitted, that after the fatal affair, she had sent to Mr. Serjeant Best for 50l. or 100l. and that a 5l. note was sent to her husband by the Serjeant, with a curious sentence on the back of it; and also that she did not make an alarm, nor go away immediately, for fear the Serjeant’s Clerk should suspect what had passed. It like-wise appeared, by the testimony of Mr. Alley, that Mrs. M. and her husband had offered to refer the matter to Mr. Erskine; but that Mr. Serjeant Best uniformly rejected the proposal, declaring it was an attack on his purse which he was determined to resist.—The Jury, without hesitation, gave a verdict of acquittal.


24-Jul-1804
Chester Courant
LAW REPORT
COURT OF KING’s BENCH, JULY 12
The King v. William Draper Best, Esq..

 This was an indictment against W. D. Best, Esq. Serjeant at Law, and member for Petersfield. He was charged with an assault upon Rebecca, the wife of James Minifie, the particulars of which will appear in the subsequent proceedings.
 Messrs. Ferguson and Littledale were counsel for the prosecution; Messrs Garrow and Lawes, for the defence.
 Mr. Littledale explained the nature of the charge, in the usual form.
 Mr. Ferguson.—“May it please your Lordship, and Gentlemen of the jury. My learned friend has stated to you from the indictment, the prominent feature of this charge; it is my duty to enter into the circumstances; and if my instructions be true, the case about to be submitted to your attention, is of singular enormity. I have no occasion to inform you that the defendant is well known in our courts of law, or that he has raised himself to the elevation on which he now stands, by his great talents, and the honourable application he has made of them. I am sure he will do me the justice to believe, that I am discharging an imperious duty, when I undertake this cause. He is aware that I should have deserted that duty, if I had refused to come forward to bring this matter before a court of justice, in that department of the profession to which I belong.
 “The situation in life of the persons most nearly interested in this prosecution has been highly respectable, but from the pressure of misfortune they have been reduced to a condition extremely different. About nine years ago Mrs. Minifie became entitled to a reversionary interest, the source of which was at that time possessed by Mrs. Hunt, a lunatic. This occasioned a law suit, and the defendant was employed as counsel for the prosecutrix; and from that period to 1802, a correspondence had been carried on between the defendant and Mr. and Mrs. Minifie, on the subject of this interest. Frequent interviews had taken place on this business, and there was not the smallest reason to complain of any neglect; the defendant had exerted himself diligently, and ably, for the protection of the rights of his client. It so happened, that in April 1802, in consequence of an information from the defendant, the lady went to his chambers to confer with him on this reversion. When she arrived, no conversation took place on the avowed object of the meeting, and the particulars I would rather you should receive from the witnesses, than from me. The result was, that an attempt was made by the defendant to violate the honour of this woman. Whatever endeavours may be employed to traduce her character, it is in my power to shew you in evidence, that a person more virtuous, or more respectable, it is not to be found on the face of the earth. It will be for you to determine what credence the story of the prosecutrix shall receive. If she is believed, the guilt of the defendant is established. It will be my object to support her testimony by other evidence, and for this purpose I shall call a gentleman of our own profession, who will tell you, that the defendant explicitly offered to make an apology for his conduct, and then no possible doubt can exist in your minds.
 “To prevent any prejudice against the motives and circumstances of this prosecution, it may be right to say a word or two to repel an objection that may be adduced. It may be said, that the case has not been brought forward so early as was natural on an occasion of this serious nature, where the passions were so powerfully affected. The reason of the delay was, that the husband, suspecting the infamous conduct of the defendant, had written a letter to Mr. Best, which had been construed into a challenge. From this cause, the prosecutor was taken up on a warrant, and was committed to prison, where he continued for a long period. The poverty of the party is another circumstance which will account for the procrastination; but in justice to the bar, I must say, that no impediment has arisen from the conduct of those to whom the defence is committed, and it becomes me to express my gratitude to his Lordship for the disposition he has manifested to accommodate the persons to whom the prosecution is confided.”
 Mrs. Manifie was then called; she stated, that in consequence of having received a letter from Serjeant Best, by his appointment she went to his chambers on the 23d of April, 1802; she expected it was to converse on the business of her reversionary estate, but when she came there, he told her that the business of the estate was inserted in the letter as a cover; that he meant it as a letter of gallantry. He added, that he wished she would live with him, and, as he termed it, make him happy. He said, he saw that her husband’s circumstances made her uneasy, but he would remove that, by getting the appointment for her husband which he had often promised. She told him she did not expect to hear of such a proposition from him, that he already knew her sentiments upon the subject; that there were many considerations and ties of duty and morality which forbade such a connection. The Serjeant was not satisfied, but used violent language. He swore he would make her suffer the pains of hell, and violently attempted to thrust his hands up her petticoats; she told him if he did not desist, she would call his clerk. While she continued there the clerk came in with a message, that Mr. Serjeant Runnington waited for him to hold a consultation. Mr. Serjeant Best endeavoured to persuade her to come again, but she never would consent to it. She was cross-examined by Mr. Garrow; she admitted that after the fatal affair, she wrote to Mr. Serjeant Best to lend her husband 50 or 100l. and that a 5l. bank note was sent to her husband by the Serjeant, with a curious sentence on the back of it. She wrote these letters by the compulsion of her husband. She did not communicate the facts to him until after he was imprisoned at the instance of the Serjeant, for sending him a challenge. Her husband suspected something, because she would not go to the chambers as she used. She thought the Serjeant was a moral man, and to this she alluded when she said the ties of duty and morality forbade her to acceded to his wishes. She did not complain to the clerk, nor go away directly, because the clerk should not suspect what had passed. She had drawn a statement for the press, but she found it closed against her. She did advertise it, and she knew that the advertisement was cut out of the paper, and sent to Mrs. Best, the Serjeant’s wife. She believes she might have been 50 times alone with the Serjeant in the course of the ten years she had known him. Being examined by the court in explanation of that expression, that the Serjeant was already aware of her opinion upon the subject of his proposition, and that she expected to hear no more of it; she was asked what had passed before; here she manifestly confused in her account, but intimated, that she had before that time received propositions of gallantry from the defendant, and that she denied that she expected to receive any on the day she went there, but thought the meeting was only relative to the reversion of the estate.
 Mr. Alley, the counsel, was next called. After answering a few interrogatories, the witness inquired if he might relate briefly the whole of the circumstances connected with the present trial; and if leave were given, he would endeavour to avoid any irrelevant matter.
 Mr. Garrow desired that the witness might be permitted, in his own way, fully to disclose every circumstance within his knowledge, at all effecting the character and conduct of his client in this transaction.
 Mr. Alley proceeded to state every material circumstance with which he was acquainted.—After an apology for the depositions he was constrained to give, under the peculiar and painful situation in which he was placed, he said, Mrs. Minifie made application to him, through the means, he believed, of a Mr. Edmunds, an attorney, whose instructions were supplied from an affidavit. The witness applied to the court for the discharge from prison of the husband of the prosecutrix. He did not obtain his release, but Mr. Erskine was subsequently more successful. Mrs. Minifie was in the habit of applying to the witness for his advice. Her visits to his chambers were previous to Michaelmas Term, or at least is was between that season and and the time of application to the Court of King’s Bench. She asked him if an action for damages could be prudently commenced? To which he answered, that it must be unproductive, because she could not then be admitted as a witness, and on her testimony the whole must depend. He told her, that the court would recommend to her the ordinary proceeding by indictment, which would be alone effectual, but he recommended her to avoid such violent measures. Mrs. Minifie stated to the witness facts, which, if true, were of a very aggravated nature. She said, she went to the defendant one day to consult with him on business, and he took liberties with her, which were not only a breach of general honour, but an infraction of professional confidence. She said, he attempted to commit a rape upon her. The word rape might not be employed, but it was the meaning she intended to convey. (The witness then explained the attempt in the way we have before stated, from the evidence of the prosecutrix.) He said she told him the defendant had offered violence to her, which had injured her breasts. A cancer had probably been occasioned in the confusion, during the scuffle at the chambers. With this ex parte statement, the witness was apprehensive that there might have been something improper, and he was anxious that matters should go no further; he, therefore, proposed that the affair should be referred to a gentleman of high honour, and of the first respectability in his profession, and he named Mr. Erskine. He said to the offended lady, that by this expedient she would receive an ample remuneration for the injury she had suffered, and every satisfaction she could desire. Her husband was present at the time of this proposal. She said she could not live with him unless she proceeded in a hostile way against the defendant. Minifie was at his chambers twice. When the conversation passed while he was there, Minifie said, he would not consent to a reference, his object was to strip the Serjeant’s gown off his back; his wife had been very cruelly treated, and he himself had been most wickedly confined, and nothing but a public exposure would satisfy him.
 When the witness pointed out there might be an adequate remuneration to them by a reference, and when he stated he would not act for them in any other way, they consented that he should go to the defendant’s. The witness went in consequence, and told the Serjeant, he was sorry to hear an offence imputed to him, which, if true, would destroy his reputation in the world. He told him all the circumstances that occurred to his recollection; to which the defendant answered—“Alley, I am obliged to you, but this is an impudent attempt to pick my pocket, and I am determined to let them proceed in the way they chuse, for I will not submit to this imposition.” These were his expressions totidem verbis. The witness said to the defendant, “The world is very censorious; you have advanced by rapid strides to the head of your profession, the necessary consequence of which is, to attract envy and malignity; and the woman is possessed of extraordinary ability; I thin it impossible that even the great talents of Mr. Garrow could shake her evidence. It would be the wisest part to refer the matter to Mr. Erskine, and you will then have the advantage of attesting on your oath your own innocence.” The defendant then repeated, he had not been guilty of any misconduct towards her; so far from doing what had been described, he had not even attempted to kiss her. The witness said all he could, for he was determined, if possible, to bring the affair to an amicable adjustment; as the means of effecting this, he sedulously endeavoured to collect the truth from the lips of the defendant, who persisted in declaring his innocence, until the witness left him.
 Mr. Alley desired now to make some observations which were connected with the subject, and which were omitted. In the conversation with Mrs. Minifie, something was said about her honour and character. The witness did say this to her: “That if any injury were suffered by her in this respect, he was confident every possible atonement would be made. He was sure the defendant was an honourable man, and would readily make a public apology for the transgression, and this should be a sine quâ non in the affair.”
 After the interview with Mr. Best, the witness returned to his chambers, where Mr. and Mrs. Minifie were waiting his return; and on acquainting them with the result of the visit, they seemed to be a good deal disappointed. The husband was under strong emotions; so much so, that he desired him not to be turbulent in his chambers, but preserve the decorum that was necessary.—Mr. Minifie then produced affidavits, and asked him if he would move the court? The witness replied, that having undertaken to act in the capacity of a friend, it would be neither proper or decent that he should proceed to hostile measures. The husband then talked about Mr. Gibbs and the witness recommended him to obtain the advice of that gentleman.
 The witness was perfectly clear, and declared it upon his oath and honour, that the defendant had never offered to make an apology. Still ?? thought, that the defendant, if innocent, was a great fool for not settling an affair of this kind in a private way.
 Lord Ellenborough.—“Did the defendant decline the reference proposed?”—A. He not only declined the reference, but avoided making any apology.
 The witness was a little angry on finding the mortification of Mr. Minifie expressed in this tumultuous manner, and from that day he said, “You are acting against my opinion, and must no longer apply for my advice.” He then left orders with his clerk, that neither of them should be admitted to him in future, having in vain employed every species of persuasion that he could resort to.
 A Juryman.—Q. Had you any authority from Minifie to say for what sum the affair might be compromised?—A. Money was never mentioned. Thus much is due to the character of those concerned in the prosecution, that nothing of that kind was ever adverted to. The application to the defendant was on my solicitation, and not at their desire. The man seemed to me in a frantic state; and I doubted if he were not affected by some paroxysm.”
 Lord Ellenborough.—“The wife could not be a witness in a civil suit; therefore, the only way to adopt was a criminal proceeding.”
 The Foreman of the Jury interposing—“I believe, my Lord, we are all satisfied, that there is no foundation for this charge, and, perhaps, stopping it here would be adviseable. It will be, perhaps, more for the credit of the defendant that he is acquitted on the evidence for the prosecution.”
 Mr. Ferguson.—“I have finished my case.”
 Mr. Garrow said, after what had been observed from the jury-box, it could not be his inclination to detain his Lordship or the Jury, with any further inquiry. A most alarming conspiracy against any gentleman never presented itself in a court of justice. There could be no more complete acquittal than what was supplied by the testimony for the prosecution.—Verdict, Not Guilty.


30-Jul-1804
Hampshire Chronicle

 Tuesday the Farnham, Alton, Alresford, and Petersfield yeomanry cavalry were inspected on Tichborne Common, Colonel Bishop. The Alresford volunteer infantry attended and kept the ground.


27-Aug-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
Capital Flock of South-Down Ewes.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,

 Without reserve, at Petersfield, Hants, on Wednesday, the 5th of September next, being Beast Market Day, at 11 o’clock in the forenoon precisely, in small lots, for the convenience of purchasers.
 ALL the entire prime stock of SOUTH-DOWN EWES; consisting of 300 two-teeths, four-teeths, and six-teeths; 100 ewe lambs; and 20 rams, the property of Henry Binsted, of Weston, who is leaving his Farm at Michaelmas next, and for fifteen years past has spared no pains or expence in improving and bringing them to such perfection. At the same time will be offered for sale, four very good Black Cart Mares, one handsome Bay Mare fit for a coach, one Colt, three years old off, four ditto, two years old off, one very handsome Sucker by the side of a thick wide Mare, and one Nag yearling colt, bred on the Weston Farm.


3-Sep-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
Desirable Residence in Hampshire

 A Capital MANSION HOUSE, with suitable Offices, and conveniency for the reception of a large and genteel family, delightfully situated within half-a-mile of Petersfield, commanding a beautiful view over an extensive lake and unbounded picturesque prospects over the adjacent country. The House has lately been much improved and put in a state of compleat repair, and is replete with conveniences; containing a spacious hall, dining room, with drawing and breakfast rooms, housekeeper’s room, butler’s pantry, servant’s hall and kitchen, five exceeding good bed rooms, with convenient closets and dressing room, and on the attic story six roomy bed chambers; the detached offices are a wash-house, dairy, granary, coach-house, stabling for eight horses, with an excellent loft over, and servant’s room. The House is situated on a dry soil, and remarkably healthy, has a lawn in front, a newly planted shrubbery, and an excellent walled-in garden, well planted with fruit trees. Distance from London 54 miles, and Portsmouth 18. Several coaches daily pass through Petersfield to and from London. From 10 to 20 Acres of Land, very contiguous, may go with the House; and the whole may be Let on Lease for 3, 6, or 9 years, as may be agreed upon. The House may be seen, and further particulars known, on application to

Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor,
Petersfield, Hants.


8-Sep-1804
Morning Chronicle
MARRIED

 Thursday, by special licence, at Earl Ferrers’s-house, in Park Lane, by the Rev. William John Jolliffe, Hylton Jolliffe, Esq. Representative in Parliament for the Borough of Petersfield, to Lady Elizabeth Rose Shirley, daughter of Earl Ferrers.


10-Sep-1804
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.

 LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES issued in the County aforesaid, from July 1, to September 8, 1804, inclusive, pursuant to the Acts of Parliament granting a Duty of 3l. 3s. on each Certificate. (all in Petersfield)
 Andrews, Richard
 Bonham, Thos, esq.
 Cannon, James
 Fleetwood, John
 Greetham, Charles
 King, Fielder, esq.
 Leer, George
 Meers, John
 Munday, Edward
 Patrick, Edward
 Whicher, Rev. John


17-Sep-1804
Hampshire Telegraph

Portsmouth, August 25, 1804.

 MR. EDITOR,  SIR—We were in expectation of having seen in last Monday’s Paper some answer to that extraordinary Advertisement in your Paper of the 13th inst. Published, it appears, by order of Gen. Whitelocke, and signed Thos Pritzler, Major of Brigade; but as no person more capable has thought proper to answer it, we feel it a duty we owe our country, ourselves, and the Butchers at large, to take some notice of it. We shall endeavour to be as brief as we are capable, and we are sure, “the will will be taken for the deed,” when we declare, we have nothing more in view than a strong love of justice towards every man, and that we are not actuated by any other motive than a wish of seeing this Advertisement coolly investigated, and fairly laid before the public. The Advertisement begins, we conceive, very improperly by saying, “To do away any apparent probability of success, &c.” which certainly is a short way of doing the business, as it is shutting our competition most completely; for, what Butcher, in his senses, after this declaration, would be mad enough to have any thing to do with the contract? We contend that the General was bound, as a man of honour, and a servant of Government, to have encouraged a fair competition;—had he acted thus, he would have discharged his duty to his country, and would have found many competitors at one half the commission allowed Mr. Padwick.
 The contract with Padwick and Edwards was made for one year it appears; is it fair to the public, we ask, to continue it for three without allowing other of his Majesty’s subjects to have a fair chance? We contend it is not. We ask who Mr. Padwick is?—does he pay a greater proportion of taxes towards the exigencies of the State, that the whole of this golden flower is to drop on his head? Or from what other cause can it be that such a preference is shewn to him alone? We say alone, for poor Edwards is only what is called in the mercantile world, a sleeping partner, or in the language of the army, retired on half pay; We presume, as good and loyal subjects of his Majesty, we have a right to complain. The statement published of the meat served the troops, furnishes us and the public with a very just picture of the nature of the savings said to amount to 45,000l. but in which, by the bye, we are persuaded the General is mistaken.—If this plan has been followed from the commencement of the contract, with Padwick, as it appears to have been for ?une, as stated, and of which we have no doubt, we mean, ??? l???ing ????n as much or more per pound for the whole carcass as any individual could buy a single lot or join? At, we only wonder how it is the savings, instead of 45,000l. as stated by the account published, had not been 90,000l. for on what principle can the saving stated arise? Is the calculation made from the price of the best ox beef in Portsmouth market? If so, we contend this is not a fair criterion; the price of every commodity should be governed by the quality of the article—not but the quality on the average might have been sufficiently good for the purpose. If the best ox beef in Portsmouth market has been the criterion on which the calculation is founded, the savings as stated on paper vanishes into air; for, instead of 7d. per pound for the time as stated, being allowed, many Butchers would have been glad to have served it of the same quality at 6 ½ d. per pound, or even less;—then, where is the saving we ask, that we have heard so much talk of?—or where is the services rendered by this contract.
 The Advertisement tells us there was much speculation previous to the adoption of this plan of contracting, throwing out, we conceive, a slur on the army, as well as the Butchers; for if the army had been proof against corruption, no harm could have arisen. So far from thinking any saving has been made, we are of the opinion, that had this contract never existed, the soldier would have bought his meat as cheap, if not cheaper, and equally good as it has been bought for him. For some considerable time meat has been gradually getting cheaper, and this might possibly have operated on the mind of the General, so far as to think Mr. P had rendered essential services, when in reality this did not appear to us to be the case. The General must excuse us, when we say, that whatever abilities he might possess as a soldier, he certainly makes a bad butcher, and a bad check clerk, not to have noticed, long since, many things; but even from the account published, we conceive sufficient, not improper, to take his own words; he tells us in the contract he had made with the Contractors, that two persons are employed to go to Smithfield and other distant markets and purchase cattle, at the market price, that the Contractors are allowed for this 27s. per bullock, and 3s. per sheep; besides being allowed, it appears by the account published, to take the offal at a very, very low price. Now, after all this, what will the public say, if, instead of going to these distant markets they have, in some instances, we conceive not a few, bought out a great deal nearer home, by which means, of course, they shortened their expences, and consequently added to their already too great profits, we say too great, because others, equally capable, would have been glad to have done it, at one half the commission allowed, by which means a saving of little or nothing short of 2000l. per annum might have been made to the country, had a fair competition been encouraged. When men feel themselves injured, they do not like to be insulted, and we conceive the statement published is of this description, to the common sense of every man, any ways acquainted or interested with this contract, to tell us the Contractors were bound to go to distant markets, for which they were allowed the enormous commission above stated, viz 27s. per bullock and 3s. per sheep; and then to see glaring an account published, in which it appears Mr. Padwick buys cattle of Mr. Pittis, of Wimering, five miles from Portsmouth, likewise of a Mr. Hooper, a butcher, of Gosport, and an agent of Padwick’s in this concern, we believe; these are distant markets indeed; to crown the whole of this—Mr. Padwick buys cattle and sheep of Mr. Padwick of Dunhill, the name of a little farm near Petersfield, belonging to and occupied by the self same Mr. Padwick the Contractor! We here call for the just indignation of every man; at the same time we beg to be understood, we do not impute to the General any thing wilfully wrong, yet let it be remembered, the effect on the public is equally the same, for it is evident from the account published for only one month, much has been done in violation to the articles of agreement, consequently the General must admit, it was his duty, as a guardian of the public purse, to have kept the Contractors to the conditions of their contract, and by suffering them to depart from it, a door was immediately opened for peculation, which the writers of this as much abhor as the General himself.
 If the General will indulge the public so far as to order, for their inspection, a copy of the transactions of this contract for one year only, we shall then see what beasts and sheep William Padwick, of Portsmouth and Dunhill, has bought of William Padwick of Dunhill, and likewise of Mr. Hooper, a butcher, his agent, at Gosport; and we feel confident, such information will arise from it, as will forcibly strike the General, of the necessity of removing many things in future, as well as procuring for the public remuneration for the past; leaving the parties concerned to contradict us if they can, we are, Sir, Yours, &c.

WM. KNIGHT
THOS. TOLLERVEY
JOHN PAY

 P.S. Since writing the above, (which on account of its length could not be inserted in either of the last two weeks papers) another statement has been published, in which the same practices are continued, and the public are again insulted, by seeing 53 beasts and 20 sheep bought of Mr. Contractor Padwick, of Dunhill, and his agent, Mr. Hooper, of Gosport, and for which, the market being such a distance, he is allowed 27s. per bullock, and 3s. per sheep, Commission. Seven pence per lb. was allowed for meat from the 25th July to the 24th August, when we do positively declare, had a competition been encouraged, we pledge our existence, such beef and mutton would have been served the different regiments at 6d. per lb. yet we are told 45,000l. has been saved by this famous contract, tho’, for our own parts, we are such Thomas’s, we cannot yet bring ourselves to believe it.


20-Sep-1804
Morning Post

 DESIRABLE RESIDENCE in Hampshire.—A Capital MANSION HOUSE, with suitable offices, and conveniency for the reception of a large and genteel family, delightfully situate within half a mile of Petersfield, commanding a beautiful view over an extensive sheet of water, and unbounded picturesque prospects over the adjacent country. The House has lately been much improved, and put in a state of complete repair, and is replete with conveniences; containing a spacious hall, dining room, withdrawing and breakfast rooms, housekeeper’s room, butler’s pantry, servant’s hall, and kitchen, five exceeding good bed rooms, with convenient closets, and dressing room, and on the attic story six roomy bed chambers. The detached offices are wash-house, dairy, granary, coach-house, stabling for eight horses, with an excellent loft over, and servant’s room. The House is situate on a dry soil, and remarkably healthy, has a lawn in front, a newly planted shrubbery, and an extensive walled-in garden, well planted with fruit trees; distance from London 54 miles, and Portsmouth 18. Several coaches daily pass through Petersfield to and from London. From 10 to 20 Acres of Meadow Land, very contiguous, may go with the House; and the whole may be Let on Lease for three, six, or nine years, as may be agreed upon. The House may be seen, and further particulars known, on application to Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield, Hants.


24-Sep-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
FROXFIELD BARNETT.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION.

 Without reserve, at the Red Lion Inn, in the Borough of Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, on Wednesday the s3 day of October, 1804, at four o’clock in the afternoon, (under the authority of the Act for inclosing the Froxfield Barnett and other Waste Lands, in the Parish of Froxfield,) in four Lots,
 THE following PIECES or PARCELS of LAND, part of the Froxfield Barnett:—
 Lot 1. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture LAND, containing by estimation 22 A. 0 R. 21 P. bounded on the north by the Turnpike Road leading from Alton to Petersfield; on the south by the Allotment of the Rev. Charles Gore; on the east by Lot 2; and on the west by the Allotment of the Lord Bishop of Winchester.
 Lot 2. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture LAND, containing by estimation 11 A. 1 R. 31 P. bounded on the north by the said Turnpike Road; on the south by the Allotments of Messrs. White and Marsh; on the east by a road leading to Colemore; and on the west by Lot 1.
 Lot 3. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture LAND, containing by estimation 34 A. 3 R. 25 P. bounded on the north by the said Turnpike Road; on the south by the Allotments of Messrs. Stevens and Thomas Silvester; on the east by Lot 4; and on the west by the road leading to Colemore.
 Lot 4. All that Piece or Parcel of Pasture LAND containing by estimation 21 A. 0 R. 8 P. bounded on the north by the said Turnpike Road; on the south by the Allotment of Mr. William Silvester; on the east by the Allotment of Henry Chawner, Esq. and on the west by Lot 3.
 The Lands above-mentioned are exempt from the great tithes for five years from Michaelmas last; containing together 89 A. 2 R. 5 P. lie in a ring fence, are capable of great improvement, and are well worthy the attention of any Person desirous of having a small and compact Farm.—The purchaser will be entitled to immediate possession, and to a conveyance of the several Lots in fee simple. Further particulars may be known of Mr. Jarman, Hambledon; Mr. Osborne, Westmeon; Mr. Turner, of Linch; and

Mr. HOPKINS, Solicitor
New Alresford, Hants.


30-Sep-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
Desirable Residence in Hampshire

 A Capital MANSION HOUSE, with suitable Offices, and conveniency for the reception of a large and genteel family, delightfully situated within half-a-mile of Petersfield, commanding a beautiful view over an extensive lake and unbounded picturesque prospects over the adjacent country. The House has lately been much improved and put in a state of compleat repair, and is replete with conveniences; containing a spacious hall, dining room, with drawing and breakfast rooms, housekeeper’s room, butler’s pantry, servant’s hall and kitchen, five exceeding good bed rooms, with convenient closets and dressing room, and on the attic story six roomy bed chambers; the detached offices are a wash-house, dairy, granary, coach-house, stabling for eight horses, with an excellent loft over, and servant’s room. The House is situated on a dry soil, and remarkably healthy, has a lawn in front, a newly planted shrubbery, and an excellent walled-in garden, well planted with fruit trees. Distance from London 54 miles, and Portsmouth 18. Several coaches daily pass through Petersfield to and from London. From 10 to 20 Acres of Land, very contiguous, may go with the House; and the whole may be Let on Lease for 3, 6, or 9 years, as may be agreed upon. The House may be seen, and further particulars known, on application to

Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor,
Petersfield, Hants.


1-Oct-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION
By Mr. WELLER
On the premises, some-time next Month,

 THE genuine and entire HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE, belonging to Captain Ballard, at Heath House, near Petersfield. Catalogues will be timely prepared, and may be had at the adjacent Market Towns, and of Mr. Weller, at his General Agency Office, Chichester.


10-Dec-1804
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
SPREAD EAGLE INN, GRACECHURCH-STREET,
London.

 THE following MAILCOACHES, Post Coaches , Diligences, and other Carriages, set out from the above Inn:—

Portsmouth, Gosport, and Petersfield Post Coaches, every evening, half past five o’clock, and morning, half past five o’clock.

17-Dec-1804
Hampshire Chronicle
Wednesday’s and Thursday’s Posts. From the LONDON GAZETTE, Dec.11.

CERTIFICATES, Jan. 1.

 T. Norris, of Petersfield, victualler.
 P. Richardson, of Portsea, bookseller.


17-Dec-1804
Hampshire Telegraph
Well worthy the attention of Graziers and others.
HANTS.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION

 At the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Wednesday the 23d day of January, 1805, unless sooner disposed of by Private Contract, of which due notice will be given,
 Lot 1. ALL those Two capital FARMS, called THE GREAT BOROUGH and LITTLE BOROUGH FARMS, situate and being in the Parish of Buriton, in the said County of Southampton, and near the Borough of Petersfield, partly in the occupation of Mr. Hugh Eames, and partly of the Widow Eames, whose respective terms therein expire at Michaelmas Day next; consisting of a good and substantial Farm-house, Malt-house, Granary, with suitable and convenient Out-buildings, Farm-yard, Garden, &c. and 62 A. 2 R. 20 P. (customary measure) of Arable Land, 95 A. 2 R. 7 P. of excellent Water Meadows, and 114 A. 0 R. 18 P. of Pasture, and a capital Fish Pond, called Doling Pond. The whole of which is Freehold, except 51 A. 1 R. 18 P. of Pasture, which is held by Lease under Magdalen College, for a term of 21 years, renewable every seven years, (subject to an old Rent of 1l. 12s. 10d. per annum, and certain Corn Rents therein mentioned) of which 17 years are yet to come and unexpired on the 6th day of December instant.
 Lot 2. All that Piece or Parcel of FREEHOLD MEADOW GROUND, situate and being in the said Parish of Buriton, and nearly adjoining Borough Hill, near Petersfield aforesaid, and called the ROD Garden, containing by admeasurement 5 A. 0 R. 5 P.
 Lot 3. All that Piece or Parcel of PASTURE GROUND, situate and being in the Parish of Petersfield aforesaid, called the LITTLE BOROUGH MEAD, containing by admeasurement 3 A. 0 P. 13 P. and held by Lease under Magdalen College, for a term of 21 years, of which 17 years are unexpired on the 6th day of December instant. The last two Pieces of Ground are now in the occupation of Wheeler Bridger, whose term therein expires on the 1st day of May, 1805.
 Lot 4. All that Piece or Parcel of GARDEN GROUND, situate and being in the Spain, in the Borough of Petersfield aforesaid, nearly walled round, called by the name of WILLMOT’s GARDEN, and containing by admeasurement 0 A. 3 R. 3 P. now occupied by Wheeler Bridger, whose term expires on the 21st December instant, and is held by Lease under Magdalen College for the term of 20 years, renewable every seven years, of which 17 years are to come and unexpired on the 6th day of December instant.
 N.B. The Timber on all the above Lots to be valued.
 For a view of the Premises apply to the respective Tenants; and for further particulars to

Mr. C. I. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield
Petersfield, 12th December, 1804.


17-Dec-1804
Hampshire Chronicle
Froxfield Barnett Inclosure.

 WE, whose Names are hereunto subscribed, Commissioners named and appointed in and by an Act made and passed in the 43d Year of his present Majesty’s Reign, intitled, “An Act for dividing, allotting, and inclosing a certain Common or Waste Lands within the Parish of Froxfield, in the County of Southampton,” have, pursuant to the Directions contained in the said Act, and in a certain other Act of Parliament made and passed in the 41st Year of the present Reign, set out and appointed the following Private Carriage Roads or Drift-ways, and Public Foot Paths in addition to the Public Carriage Roads heretofore set out and confirmed, (that is to say).

PRIVATE ROADS
 One Private Carriage Road or Drift-way of the Breadth of 16 Feet, and of the Length of 60 Rod, commencing at the End of Ivy House-Lane and proceeding across the Barnett to a certain Public Carriage Road there leading to King’s Lane; one other Private Carriage Road or Drift-way of the like Breadth of 16 Feet, and of the Length of 12 Rod, commencing at a certain Public Carriage Road leading to Longhurst-Lane and proceeding to the Poor-House situate at the West End of the Barnett; one other Private Carriage Road or Drift-way of the like Breadth of 16 Feet, and of the Length of 16 Rod, commencing at the South End of the first Allotment of Mr. Thomas White, and proceeding to Clay Pit Pond; and one other Private Carriage Road or Drift-way of the like Breadth of 16 Feet, branching from the Carriage Road leading to Old Litten and proceeding into ancient Inclosure of Samuel Twyford, Esq.
FOOT-WAYS
 One Public Foot-way of the Breadth of 6 Feet; commencing at Hony Crutch Cottage, and proceeding in a Northward Direction across the first Allotment of Samuel Twyford, Esq. to Old Warren Corner; one other Public Foot-way of the like Breadth of 6 Feet, commencing at the Cottage belonging to John Thorp, situate on the Barnett, and proceeding in a North-west Direction under the Hedge across the Allotment of Miss Martha Maria Marder, to the Public Carriage Road leading to Barnett-Lane; and one other Public Foot-way of the like Breadth of 6 Feet, commencing at the Lane End of Gilman’s Farm, and proceeding under the West Hedge bounding the first Allotment of the Rev. Charles Gore, Southward to the Public Carriage Road leading to Longhurst-Lane.
 And we have caused the said Private Carriage Roads and Public Foot-ways to be marked and staked out, and a Map thereof Deposited with our Clerk, Mr. EDWARD HOPKINS, at his Office in New Alresford, in the said County, for the Inspection and Perusal of all Persons concerned.
 And we do hereby give Notice, that we shall meet on MONDAY the 7th Day of JANUARY next, at 11 o’Clock in the Forenoon, at the Dolphin Inn, in the Borough of Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, for the Purpose of hearing Objections to the said Roads, at which Meeting any Person injured or aggrieved by the setting out the said Roads, or by not setting out, or appointing any other Public or Private Roads or Ways, in, over, or upon, the said Common, and other Waste Lands in the said Parish, are requested to attend.—Dated this 26th Cay of November, 1804.

THOMAS JARMAN,
CHARLES OSBORN,
JOHN TURNER.

1805

14-Jan-1805
Hampshire Telegraph

 THE MISS WHEATLEYS grateful for the liberality and kindness they have recently experienced, return thanks to their numerous friends for the same, and inform them their School will recommence on the 21st inst. at which time, by a continuation of the same care and attention hitherto shewn to the improvement and comfort of their Pupils, they hope to merit their further support.
  Terms ………………………………. 20 Guineas per annum
  Entrance ………………………….. 1 Guinea
  Parlour Boarders ……………… 35 Guineas
 Writing, French, Music, Dancing, &c. by most approved Masters.—Petersfield, January, 1805


21-Jan-1805
Hampshire Telegraph

 Sir J. Eyles is elected Mayor of the ancient Borough of Petersfield.

21-Jan-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
Notice to Debtors and Creditors.

 ALL Persons having any Claim or Demand on the Estate and Effects of Mr. JOSEPH TRISSELL, late of Petersfield, deceased, are desired to send an account thereof to Mr. Cannon, of Petersfield aforesaid, Attorney at Law, in order that they may be examined and settled: And all Persons who are indebted to the said Estate, are requested immediately to pay the amount of their respective Debts to the said Mr. Cannon, without further notice.
 Petersfield, Jan. 16, 1805


18-Mar-1805
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
SALISBURY
MONDAY, March 18, 1805.

 William Dyer, convicted of having stolen a lamb out of a field at Crockerton; Ann Brazier, for stealing two pieces of striped toilenet cloth, the property of Mr. Hayward, of Wilton; William King, alias Hyatt, for stealing a box containing money of the value of 2l. 4s. 6d. Wm. Fricker, for stealing a quantity of dyed wool from a drying stove at Corsley; and James Lucas, for bigamy, in marrying Fanny Whitmarsh, at Petersfield, his former wife being living, were all sentenced to be transported for seven years.


22-Apr-1805
Hampshire Telegraph

 Abstract of the Receipts and Expenditure of the Parish of Portsmouth, between the 17th April, 1804, and 16th April, 1805. RECEIVED

22-Apr-1805
Hampshire Telegraph

 On Saturday last, a fine young man, was killed near Petersfield, by one of the waggon-horses, which he was driving, kicking him down, and the waggon which was loaded, passing over his thigh, which nearly crushed it from his body.


27-May-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
FROXFIELD INCLOSURE AWARD.

 We, whose names are hereunto subscribed, Commissioners named and appointed in and by an Act of Parliament, made and passed in the 43d year of the reign of his present Majesty King George the Third, entitled, “An Act for dividing, allotting, and inclosing a Common or Waste called the Froxfield Barnett, and other Wastes and Commonable Lands, in the parish of Froxfield, in the county of Southampton,” Do hereby give Notice, that we intend to hold our next Meeting at the Dolphin Inn, in the borough of Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, on Wednesday the 12th day of June next, at Eleven o’clock in the forenoon, for the special purpose of reading over and executing the Award made by us, under and by virtue of the said Act, at which Meeting the several proprietors and persons interested in the said Inclosures, are requested to attend.—Given under our hands this 23d day of May, 1805.

THOS. JARMAN,
CHAS. OSBORNE,
JOHN TURNER.


10-Jun-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
Dwelling-house, Malt-house, and Premises, at Petersfield.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,

 On Wednesday the 12th June inst. at 4 o’clock in the afternoon, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield,
 A Desirable & convenient FREEHOLD DWELLING-HOUSE, MALTHOUSE, Out-houses, Garden, and Premises, with an Orchard, and two Closes of Meadow Land adjoining, containing in the whole three acres and nine perches, situate in the Tything of Weston, but adjoining the Town of Petersfield, now in the occupation of Mr. Thomas Hall, Maltster, whose term expires on the 16th of May next. Further particulars may be known by applying to Mr. Cannon, Solicitor, Petersfield


2-Jul-1805
Globe
MONTHLY LIST OF FAIRS,
FOR JULY, 1805.
(When the Day of the Month happens on a Sunday, the Fairs are supposed to be held on the Monday)
ENGLAND and WALES.

 Petersfield, … July 10.

6-Jul-1805
Oxford Journal
COUNTRY FAIRS

 WEDNESDAY, July 10.—…Petersfield, Portsmouth, 14 days, Ringwood, and Stockbridge, Hants


5-Aug-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
RAMSDEAN, HANTS.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By Mr. COLLINS.

 At the Sun Inn, Petersfield, on Saturday the 24th day of August, 1805, at four o’clock in the afternoon,
 A Small compact FARM, consisting of two Messuages, a good Barn, and Gateroom, with about 22 Acres of rich Arable and Meadow Land, with very extensive Common Right, situate at Ramsdean and Strood Bridge, and held of the Manor of Eastmeon. The above Farm is capable of very great improvement. Possession will be given at Michaelmas next. Further particulars may be known by applying to Mr. Crasweller, at Wellsworth, near Rowland’s Castle; Mr. Cannon, Solicitor, Petersfield; or to the Auctioneer, Portsea.


9-Sep-1805
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.

 LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES, issued in the County aforesaid, from July 1 to Sept. 6, 1805, pursuant to the Acts of Parliament granting a Duty of 3l. 3s. on each Certificate. (All from Petersfield)
 Andrews, Richard, esq.
 Binsted, Henry
 Bonham, Thomas, esq.
 Cannon, James
 Greetham, Charles

[ To be concluded in the next Paper]


16-Sep-1805
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.

 LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES, issued in the County aforesaid, from July 1 to Sept. 6, 1805, pursuant to the Acts of Parliament granting a Duty of 3l. 3s. on each Certificate. (All from Petersfield)

[concluded from the last Paper]
 King, Fielder, esq.
 Kitson, Richard, esq.d
 Meeres, John, esq.
 Patrick, Edward, esq.
 Patrick, Edward, jun. esq.
 Whicher, rev. John


16-Sep-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
Capital Manor and Estates in Hants.

 SHORTLY will be SOLD by AUCTION, several FREEHOLD FARMS; containing in the whole by estimation, 900 Statute Acres of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, situate in the Parish of Liss, within 3 miles of the Town of Petersfield; together with the Manor of Liss, comprising the whole of the Parish, with the Rights, Royalties, Privileges, Heriots, Quit-Rents, Reliefs, and Appurtenances thereunto belonging. Particulars whereof will be advertised in due time.


21-Sep-1805
Morning Post

 CAPITAL MANOR and ESTATE in HANTS.—To be SOLD by PRIVATE CONTRACT, All that Capital MANOR, or reputed MANOR of LISS, with the Rights, Royalties, Reliefs, Members, and Appurtenances thereunto belonging, comprising the whole Parish of Liss. The Estate is Freehold, and consists of an ancient Mansion, and several valuable and well cultivated Farms, containing in the whole 900 statute acres (more or less). The Manor abounds with game, and is pleasantly situated on the London turnpike road, about two miles distance from Petersfield, and twenty from Portsmouth. The quit rents amount to 13l. 10s. per annum, and a heriot of the best beast is payable by the proprietors of twenty-one freehold estates, situate within the manor. The land consists of excellent meadow, pasture, and arable, with some wood-lands, and is now let to tenants at will. The waste of the manor is very extensive, amounting to upwards of 1100 acres, on part of which there is a large quantity of young growing timber. A Plan of the Estate is left with Mr. Andrews, of Petersfield, of whom further particulars may be known; and of Mr. Hoper, Great Marlborough-street, London; or of Mr. Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield.—All letters, post paid, will be immediately attended to.


23-Sep-1805
Hampshire Chronicle
BAILIFF, and DAIRY MAID.

 WANTED, at Michaelmas next, a middle-aged MAN and his WIFE, of sufficient experience to undertake the place of a WORKING BAILIFF, and manage the SUCKLING and DAIRY at Milland Farm, between Petersfield and Liphook.
 Apply to JOHN WILKES, Esq. Milland House.


30-Sep-1805
Hampshire Telegraph

 LOST, from Petersfield Heath, about the middle of July last, a GLAMORGANSHIRE HEIFER, three years old, with brown sides, white back and belly, coop horns, grey face, and marked J H on the ????n. Whoever will give information or bring the same to the Town Crier of Petersfield, shall receive TWO GUINEAS Reward, and all reasonable expences.—Petersfield, September 20, 1805.


11-Oct-1805
Kentish Weekly Post or Canterbury Journal
MARRIED.

 Sep. 29, at Spelhurst, Mr. John Nash, bookseller, of Tunbridge-Wells, to Miss Booker, of Ramshill, Petersfield.


21-Oct-1805
London Courier & Evening Gazette
WITH A GUARD AND LAMPS.

 PORTSMOUTH, Portsea, and Petersfield ACCOMMODATION NIGHT COACH, sets out from the Saracen’s Head Inn, Snow-hill, London, every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday Evenings, to the Coach Office, No. 112, Queen-street, Portsea, and at Mr. Peter’s Office, on the Point, Portsmouth. Returns every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
 The Proprietors are determined to do their utmost to accommodate the town of Portsea, &c. Places may be secured at the Office in Queen street, London; and Goods delivered immediately on the arrival.


28-Oct-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
HANTS.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By Mr. WILLMER,

 On Wednesday the 27th of November next, at 4 o’clock in the afternoon, at the Dolphin Inn Petersfield,
 ALL that valuable and desirable COPYHOLD ESTATE, called Week Green Farm, situate and being in the parish of Froxfield, in the County of Southampton, and now in the occupation of the Proprietor, Mr. Richard Souter; consisting of a good farm-house, malt-house, granary, store-houses, 3 barns, stables, and other convenient out-buildings, a newly planted orchard, and a never failing well of water, with about 187 Acres of Arable Land, 19 Acres of Meadow and Pasture Land, 9 Acres of Wood Land, and an allotment on the Froxfield Barnett, consisting of about 34 Acres. The above Premises are Copyhold of Inheritance, held under the Bishop of Winchester, within the Manor of Eastmeon, and nearly equal to Freehold. The buildings are in excellent repair and may be viewed by applying to the proprietor, from whom immediate possession may be had. The Timber to be taken at a valuation. For further particulars apply to the Auctioneer, or to

Mr. C. J. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield. 


7-Dec-1805
Oxford Journals
COUNTRY FAIRS.

 WEDNESDAY, Dec. 11.—…Petersfield and Ringwood, Hants.


9-Dec-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
Freehold Estate, Sussex
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,

 At the Dolphin Inn, at Petersfield, Hants, on Wednesday the 8th day of January, 1806, between the hours of two and four o’clock in the afternoon, unless sooner disposed of Private Contract, of which timely notice will be given.
 ALL that very desirable FREEHOLD FARM, called BRIDGELAND FARM, situate in the several parishes of Trotton, Treford, Chidhurst, and Iping, in the County of Sussex; consisting of a farm-house, two barns with separate gaterooms, a stable, carthouse, cow-pens, and other convenient buildings, and 71 A. 2 R. 34 P. more or less, of meadow, pasture, and arable Land, of which, about 17 acres are rich watered meadow, now in the occupation of Mr. Peter Ayling, tenant at will. To be viewed on application to the Tenant.
 N. B. The Timber to be paid for at a valuation to be made by two Persons to be chosen, viz. one by the Vendor, and the other by the Purchaser.—Ten per cent. to be paid at the Auction, and the remainder on the 1st of March next.
 Further particulars may be had of Mr. Clement, Solicitor, at Alton or Farnham; of Mr. William Blunt, at Petersfield; and of the Auctioneer, at Petersfield.


23-Dec-1805
Morning Post

 PATRIOTIC FUND.—Lloyd’s, December 17, 1805. Many applications having been received from the Relatives of Officers and Men who have fallen in His Majesty’s Service, unaccompanied with proper testimonials; the Committee adopt this mode of giving notice, that Certificates are expected of the Relation in which the Claimants stood to the deceased, and of their circumstances being such as to entitle them to relief, signed by the Magistrate’s Clerk g?????, or some other person of respectability, in the place where they reside. Widows are requested to mention the number of their Children, with their respective ages; and Parents to provide proof, that the deceased left neither Widow nor Child. Navy Pay Office Certificates of the Parties having been permitted to receive the Wages of those under whom they claim, will be considered sufficient evidence of their being the legal Representatives.

J. P. WELSFORD, Secretary 

 CONTRIBUTIONS, after Divine Service, on the DAY of THANKSGIVING, for the RELIEF of the SEAMEN, SOLDIERS, MARINES, and VOLUNTEERS, wounded; and the WIDOWS, ORPHANS, and RELATIVES of those killed, in His Majesty’s Service.
 Amount of New Subscriptions advertised, £29,162 14 0

1806

6-Jan-1806
Hampshire Telegraph
COUNTY HOSPITAL, WINCHESTER.

 The Governors and Subscribers to this Charity are requested to take Notice, that Reports of the State of the Hospital for the last year are deposited with, and will be delivered to them on application to, Messrs. Hoare, bankers, London; Messrs. Waller, bankers, Winchester; Mr. Mountaine, Portsmouth; Mr. Westmore, Gosport; Mr. Kellow, Southampton; Mr. Maud, Andover; Mr. Knapp, Alresford; Mr. Lyford, Basingstoke; Thomas Beckley, Esq. Lymington; Mr. Waterworth, Newport; Mr. Willmer, Petersfield; Mr. Jennings, Bishop’s Waltham; Mr. Waring, Alton; Mr. Holding, Kingsclere; Mr. Hollis, Romsey; Mr. Charles Hodges, Ringwood; and at the County Hospital.

E. J. WHITTLE, Secretary. 

 N. B. Subscribers whose subscriptions were due at Michaelmas 1805, as also those who are further in arrears, are requested to pay their subscriptions forthwith.


21-Feb-1805
Hampshire Telegraph
Notice to Debtors and Creditors.

 ALL Persons having any Claim or Demand on the Estate and Effects of Mr. JOSEPH TRISSELL, late of Petersfield, deceased, are desired to send an account thereof to Mr. Cannon, of Petersfield aforesaid, Attorney at Law, in order that they may be examined and settled: And all Persons who are indebted to the said Estate, are requested immediately to pay the amount of their respective Debts to the said Mr. Cannon, without further notice.
 Petersfield, Jan. 16, 1805

24-Feb-1806
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,

 On Tuesday the 25th day of February, 1806, precisely at three o’clock in the afternoon, at the Red Lion Inn, in Petersfield,
 Lot 1. ABOUT One Hundred Loads BEECH TIMBER, of different meetings.
 Lot 2. About Fifty Loads of ASH TIMBER, of different meetings.
 The whole growing or lying, and being on the several Farms and Lands belonging to Sir Henry Fetherstonhaugh, Bart in the Parish of Harting, in the County of Sussex. Thomas Pink, of Harting, will shew the Timber; and further particulars may be known by applying to Mr. Andrews, at Petersfield; or Mr. Hogg, at Hacktholt Farm, in the Parish of Harting.


14-Apr-1806
Hampshire Telegraph

 A few days since died, at Petersfield, Mrs. Eames, relict of Mr. H. Eames, who had the contract for conveying the mail from Petersfield to Mousehill, and which was afterwards enjoyed by the widow. Immediately on her death, a number of applications were made for this contract; but the Post-Master-General has been pleased to appoint Mr. Cross, who has for many years forwarded the mail from this place to Petersfield, in a manner so punctual and regular as to give entire satisfaction to the Post-Office. Mr. Cross has now the Royal Mail Coach from Portsmouth to Mousehill, being half the distance to London.


9-Jun-1806
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By GLOVER and SON,

 At the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, on Wednesday, July 9, 1806, at Three o’Clock in the Afternoon, in twenty Lots,
 SEVERAL Very Valuable and Desirable FREEHOLD ESTATES, situate in the Parish of Liss, in the county of Southampton, consisting of the MANOR of LISS, and of several compact FARMS, containing about Nine Hundred Acres of Arable , Meadow, and Pasture LAND, and COPPICE-GROUND, let to responsible Tenants at Will, at improveable Rents, (the Coppice-Ground being in hand).
 Lot 1. A desirable and compact FARM, called FLEXCOMB FARM, consisting of a Farm-House, Barn, necessary Out-buildings, and 134 Acres, I Rood, and 14 Perches , more or less, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, now in the occupations of Messrs. JOHN MELLERSH, THOMAS SILVESTER, and BENJAMIN BRIDGER.
 Lot 2. A MEADOW, called STEEL MEADOW, containing 1 Acre, 1 Rood, and 14 Perches, more or less, in the occupations of Messrs. MELLERSH, SILVESTER, and BRIDGER. This Lot is subject to the payment of the yearly sum of ten shillings to Sir Henry Tichborne, Bart.
 Lot 3. The capital MANSION HOUSE, called LISS-PLACE HOUSE (with the Materials of a Barn, two Stables, and other Buildings, and two rich Steddles now standing and being in a field, called Hunt’s Orchard, in Lot 4) with 264 Acres, 1 Rood, and 1 Perch of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, and Coppice-Ground, more or less, also in the occupations of the said Mess. MELLERSH, SILVESTER, and BRIDGER (the Coppice-Grounds being in hand). There are also three Fish Ponds, well stocked with large Carp, supposed to weigh from six to ten pounds and upwards, and some other fish.
 Lot 4. A desirable and compact Freehold FARM, called BERRYGROVE FARM, consisting of a Farm-House, and convenient Out-buildings, with 188 Acres, 1 Rood, and 38 Perches, more or less, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, and Coppice-Ground, in the occupations of Messrs. JAMES MOORE, and HENRY FRY (the Coppice-Ground being in hand).
 Lot 5. A Freehold FARM, called BURGAT’s FARM, consisting of a Farm-House, and convenient Out-buildings, with 74 Acres, 3 Roods, and 15 Perches, more or less, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, in the occupation of the said JAMES MOORE.
 Lot 6. A Freehold MESSUAGE, Out-houses, and Garden, in the occupation of ANN STONE, widow.
 Lot 7. A freehold MESSUAGE, Out-houses, Granary, Garden, and 2 Acres and 29 Perches , more or less, of Arable Land, in the occupation of FRANCIS GARRATT.
 Lot 8. Five several Freehold Pieces, or Parcels, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture LAND, containing, by estimation, 20 Acres, 2 Roods, and 16 Perches, more or less, in the several occupations of Messrs. JAMES MOORE, HENRY FRY, and JOHN MILLS.
 Lot 9. Two Pieces of Freehold LAND, called NEW MILL LANDS, containing, by estimation, 7 Acres, 1 Rood, and 10 Perches, more or less, in the occupation of the said JAMES MOORE.
 Lot 10. A Freehold FARM, called WILDGREEN FARM, consisting of a Farm-house, and convenient Out-buildings, and 42 Acres, 2 Roods, and 1 Perch, more or less, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, in the occupation of Elizabeth FRY, widow.
 Lot 11. A Freehold MESSUAGE, WATER CORN-MILL, and convenient Out-buildings, with 9 Acres, 2 Roods, and 14 Perches, more or less, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, in the occupation of the said JOHN MILLS.
 Lot 12. A Freehold COTTAGE, Out-House, and Garden, in the occupation of JAMES HOARE.
 Lot 13. A compact Freehold FARM, called POPHOLE FARM, consisting of a Farm-House, and convenient Out-buildings, with 55 Acres, and 1 Rood, more or less, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, in the occupation of the said JOHN MILLS.
 Lot 14. Two Close of Freehold LAND, containing, by estimation, 9 Acres and 30 Perches, more or less, in the occupation of the said JOHN MILLS.
 Lot 15. Two Freehold Closes of LAND, containing, by estimation, 6 Acres, 2 Roods, and 7 Perches, more or less, called Hunts, in the occupation of the said JOHN MILLS.
 Lot 16. A Freehold COTTAGE, with a Meadow, called Hurstgate Meadow, containing, by estimation, 3 Acres, 2 Roods, and 37 Perches, more or less, in the occupations of HENRY and WILLIAM KNIGHT.
 Lot 17. Several Freehold Closes of Land, containing, by estimation, 13 Acres, two Roods, and ?? Perches, more or less, in the occupation of the said JAMES MOORE.
 Lot 18. A COPPICE, called BEECHWOOD COPPICE, containing, by estimation, 1 Acre, 3 Roods, and 3 Perches, more or less, in hand.
 Lot 19. A compact Freehold FARM, called STODHAM FARM, consisting of a Farm-house and convenient Out-buildings, with 111 Acres, 1 Rood, and 18 Perches, more or less, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, in the occupation of Mr. JOSEPH INWOOD.
 Lot 20. The LORDSHIP or MANOR of LISS, extending over the whole Parish, containing 3,588 Acres, or thereabouts, abounding with Game, and several Trout Streams run through the same.
 A large quantity of Timber is growing on the wastes of the Manor, which are particularly adapted for the growth of Timber.
 The Quit-rents payable to the Manor amount to 13l. 10s. per annum.
 There are also upwards of 20 Heriots of the best Beast, payable by the Owners of different Freehold Estates within the Manor.
 The Turnpike Road from London to Portsmouth, goes through part of the parish of Liss, which is distant from London only 50 miles, from Portsmouth 20 miles, from Petersfield 2 miles, and from Alton 10 miles, all good Market Towns.
 RICHARD KNIGHT, of Liss, will shew the Estate, and printed Particulars will be ready for delivery by the 7th day of June next, at the following Inns; viz. the Dolphin, Petersfield; George, Portsmouth; Swan, Chichester; Swan, Alton; Anchor, Liphook; George, Alresford; Angel, Midhurst; at Mr. HOOPER’s, No. 42, Great Marlborough-street, London; or of Mr. ANDREWS, or Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield; where Plans may be seen.


5-Jul-1806
Oxford Journal
COUNTRY FAIRS

 THURSDAY, July 10.—…Petersfield, Portsmouth, 14 days, Ringwood, and Stockbridge, Hants;


15-Sep-1806
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.

 LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES, issued in the County aforesaid, from July 1 to Sept. 11, 1806, pursuant to the Acts of Parliament granting a Duty of 3l. 3s. on each Certificate.
 Names   Places of Abode
 Andrews, Richard, esq. Petersfield
 Blunt, William, esq.   Buriton
 Blunt, William     Petersfield
 Greetham, Moses   Petersfield
 King, Fielder, esq.   Petersfield
 Lear, George      Petersfield
 Meres, John      Petersfield
 Patrick, Edward, jun.  Petersfield
 Patrick, Edward, esq.  Petersfield
 Small, John, jun.    Petersfield

29-Sep-1806
Hampshire Chronicle
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION
By T. WILLMER

 With immediate Possession, at the George Inn, in Petersfield, on Friday the 17th day of October, 1806, at three o’clock in the afternoon,
 A Very desirable compact ESTATE, called WHEELER’s FARM, in the Parish of Froxfield, Hants; comprehending a farm house, two barns, stable, cowpens, granary, cart and fuel houses, a large garden and fruitful orchard, together with 131 acres [hedgerows included) of arable, three of meadow, and four of coppice ground, (more or less) customary measure; the Premises are Copyhold of Inheritance, under the Bishop of Winchester; are situated within a mile of Froxfield Church, 9 from Alresford, 9 from Alton, and 3 from Petersfield; and may be viewed by applying to Mr. P. Baker, the present occupier and proprietor.
 The Timber is to be taken at a fair valuation, over and above the Price the Estate may sell for; and also allowance in like manner to be made for Turnips, Seeds, Plowing, &c. Manure.


29-Sep-1806
Hampshire Telegraph
SUSSEX.
Freehold Estates.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER

 With immediate possession, on Wednesday the 2d day of October, 1806, at the House of Thomas Patrick, bearing the Sign of the Dolphin, Petersfield, between the hours of four and six o’clock in the afternoon, according to the conditions of sale, (unless disposed of in the mean time by private contract, of which notice will be given)
 Lot 1. ALL that MESSUAGE, Barns, Gate-room, garden, and convenient Offices, together with 100 customary Acres of Arable, Meadow, Pasture, and Coppice Land, more or less, situate and lying in the Parish of Rogate, in the County of Sussex, called Comb Land Farm, and late in the occupation of Mrs. Mary Jaques.
 Lot 2. All that Barn, Gateroom, and 19 customary Acres of Arable Land, more or less, adjoining the last-mentioned Lot.
 N.B. The above Estates are within four miles of Petersfield and Liphook, market towns, abounding with game, and most desirably situated for field sports. The Timber on the Estates to be taken at a fair valuation, down to 6d. Part of the purchase money may remain on mortgage. For particulars enquire of Mr. T. Martin, Rogate; Mr. Greetham, Solicitor, Petersfield; and for a sight of the Premises, to E. Stenning.


3-Nov-1806
Hampshire Chronicle
LONDON
SATURDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 1.
Members already elected.

 Petersfield—H. Jolliffe, Esq. J. Ward, Esq.

6-Nov-1806
Caledonian Mercury
NEW PARLIAMENT.
Those marked thus * are New Members.

 Petersfield—Hylton Joliffe, *J. W. Ward.



13-Nov-1806
Morning Post
DOUGLAS ON ELECTIONS

 This day is published, a new Edition, with Corrections and Additions, in four vols. 8vo. Price 1l. 10s. in Boards, of
 THE HISTORY of the CASES of CONTROVERTED ELECTIONS.—By the Right Hon. SYLVESTER DOUGLAS, Lord Glenbervie, containing the following Cases:—Milbourn Port, Morpeth, Westminster, Hindon, Downton, Bristol, Cricklade, New Radnor, Dorchester, Taunton, Pontefract, Abingdon, Shrewsbury, Helleston, Bedford, Sudbury, Wigtown, &c. in Scotland, Poole, Shaftesbury, Haslemere, Clackmannan, Lanark, St. Ives, North Berwick, Petersfield, Seaford, Peterborough, Iveschester, Cardigan, Worcester, Derby, Southampton, and Fife.—With numerous Notes, and an Introduction on the Jurisdiction of the House of Commons, Authority of Precedents, Constitution of Committees for trying Controverted Elections, and the Manner of proceeding in them, with reference to Statutes, and final Determinations respecting the Rights of Elections.

Printed for John Stockdale, Piccadilly.


6-Dec-1806
Oxford Journal
COUNTRY FAIRS

 THURSDAY, Dec. 11.—Petersfield and Ringwood, Hants.

17-Dec-1806
Belfast Commercial Chronicle
MEMBERS
OF THE
NEW IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT,
Summoned to meet December 15, 1806.

 Petersfield—Hylton Joliffe, * J. W. Ward


22-Dec-1806
Hampshire Telegraph
ROGATE, SUSSEX.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,

 At the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, on Wednesday the 7th day of January, 1807, at four o’clock in the afternoon,
A MESSUAGE, OUT-HOUSES, and several Closes or Parcels of Arable and Pasture Land, containing by estimation 29 acres, be the same more or less, situate and being in the Parish of Rogate, in the County of Sussex, and now in the several occupations of Thomas Soane, William Aslatt, and Edward Waller, with Right of Common in Harting Combe for two O?ifes. Further particulars may be known on application to Mr. Souter, of Rogate; Mr. John Lintot, of Turwick; or

Mr. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield


1807

1-Jan-1807
Morning Advertiser

 Early on Monday morning a most desperate Duel took place in the Devil’s Punch-bowl, near Petersfield; on the first change of shot no mischief seemed to have taken place; but after a second change one of the party was supported by his second, and at the same time to be preparing for a third fire; two Gentlemen being perceived to descend the Bowl, they made a precipitate retreat on the opposite side; one of the party discharged his piece while ascending the height, and the other was assisted by the seconds in making his escape, as though wounded.
 The party were supposed to be Naval officers.


3-Jan-1807
Public Ledger and Daily Advertiser

 On Friday night, Mr. Mills, miller, of Lyss, near Petersfield, was stopped in the forest, near Horndean, Sussex, by a man who had a gun, and a dog with him; the fellow put the gun to Mr. Mill’s breast, and swore he would shoot him, if he did not deliver to him his money. Mr. M. terrified at his appearance and imprecations, gave him his purse, containing in gold and silver, about fifty shillings. The same fellow soon after robbed a servant of Mr. Mullen, of Hambledon, of a watch; and a higgler of eight shillings. An alarm was soon given at Horndean, when Mr. Marner, a peace-officer, and several other persons, went in search of the depredator, and were successful in taking him. He belongs to a gang of Gipsies; who, he stated, were concerned with him, and that they had a tent in the midst of the forest, almost a mile from the turnpike-road, which the constable, &c. searched, and there found ten others of the gang, whom they also secured.


3-Jan-1807
Northampton Mercury

Duke of Richmond.—On Sunday night, about ten o’clock, died, at his seat at Goodwood, in Sussex, Charles Lenox, Duke of Richmond, in England, and of Lenox, in Scotland, Knight of the Garter, &c. in the 73d year of his age, being born Feb. 22, 1734. He married, April 1, 1757, Mary, eldest daughter and co-heiress of the Earl of Aylesbury.
 His Grace was of Royal extraction, being descended from Charles Lenox, natural son of King Charles II. by Lady Louisa Renne de Penencourt, a French Lady, who came to England with the Duchess of Orleans, the King’s sister; and whom his Majesty not only created Duchess of Portsmouth, Countess of Farnham, and Baroness of Petersfield, in England, but prevailed on Louis XIV. to confer on her the title of Duchess of Aubigny, in France.—His Grace was a Field-Marshal of Great-Britain, and a Colonel of the Royal Regiment of Horse Guards (Blue).
 The reports lately circulated about his Grace’s marriage are not true, and he will be succeeded in his titles and estates by his nephew, the Hon. Gen. Lenox, Representative for the county of Sussex. We understand that the Duke’s communication to his successor, related only to the provision his Grace had made for three natural daughters, and a request that they and their mother might be suffered to reside on a particular farm near Goodwood, to which the mother was greatly attached.
 It is said his Majesty has given the vacant Blue Ribband, and the Lord Lieutenancy of the county of Sussex, to his Grace the Duke of Norfolk. A messenger has also been dispatched to his Grace the Duke of Northumberland, with his Majesty’s gracious offer of the command of the fine regiment of Oxford Blues.


19-Jan-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY PRIVATE CONTRACT,
Either together or in Parcels,

 ALL that MESSUAGE or TENEMENT, Barns, Stables, Cowpens, Carthouse, Farm Yard, Garden, and Hop Kiln, situate at Ramsdean, in the Parish of Eastmeon, in the County of Southampton; together with 66A. 2R. 16P. customary acres of Hop, Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, with an unlimited Right to an extensive Common and Down. Also, the Rectorial Tythes of Ramsdean, extending over nearly 1200 acres of Land. The above Estate is Copyhold of Inheritance, under the Manor of Eastmeon, and the Tythes are held by a Lease for three good existing Lives, under the Bishop of Winton, at a small quit rent.—N.B. The Land Tax of the whole is Redeemed. For further particulars apply to Mr. Eyles, Eastmeon; or to

Mr. C. I. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield.


2-Feb-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,
On Thursday the 5th day of February, 1807,

 ALL the HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE and STOCK in TRADE, of Mr. William Poynter, Wheelwright, in Petersfield. The Sale to begin with the Stock, precisely at twelve o’clock.
 Also, in the afternoon of the following day, will be Sold by Auction, at the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, precisely at five o’clock, in one Lot, all those extensive and desirable PREMISES, now in the occupation of William Poynter aforesaid; comprehending his Dwelling-house, with a Barn, Stable, and Out-houses, thereunto belonging. Also, a new-built, sashed Dwelling-house, Stable, and Fuel-house, in the occupation of Mr. Palmer; together with a large and fertile Garden; a fruitful Orchard in the prime of bearing, and a rich Plat of Arable Land, containing in the whole three acres more or less. The above Estate is most eligibly situated at the entrance of Petersfield, on the London Road to Portsmouth, and merits the attention of any Gentleman in quest of a salubrious and pleasant spot for building and improvements; or is equally interesting in point of situation, to the Man of Business; or, to the speculating Builder.
 May be viewed by applying to W. Poynter aforesaid, on the Premises; or the Auctioneer, in Petersfield.


2-Mar-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,

 At the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, on Friday the 3d day of April, 1807, at three of the clock in the afternoon,
 FIVE HUNDRED and TWENTY-SIX OAK TREES, the greatest part whereof are fit for the Navy, hammer marked with the letters I A M, now standing and growing on a farm in the occupation of Mr. Smith Howard, in the parish of Petersfield; and in several Farms and Lands adjoining together, situate and being in the parish of Harting, in the County of Sussex. Thomas Pinke, of Harting, will shew the Timber, and further particulars may be known by applying to Mr. Andrews, Petersfield.


16-Mar-1807
Hampshire Chronicle

 On Wednesday died, after a severe and lingering illness, which she bore with exemplary fortitude and resignation, Mrs. Hoper, wife of M. Hoper, Esq. of Great Marlborough-street, London, and daughter of Richard Andrews, Esq. of Petersfield.


23-Mar-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
EDUCATION

 AT Froxfield School, near Petersfield, Hants, YOUNG GENTLEMEN are genteely Boarded and carefully Instructed in the English Language, Writing, Arithmetic, Book-keeping, Mensuration, Gauging, Geometry, Land Surveying, and Planning, (Washing included) for 18 Guineas per annum, and a Guinea entrance, by Thomas Baynton. As Mr. B. will take only a few Boarders, and prefers taking them 5 to 10 years old, he solicits the attention of those Parents who may have such Children to put to School, and assures them the tenderest regard will be paid to the Children’s health, morals, and comfort. The situation is extremely healthy. N.B. There will be no extra charges, except for Books, &c.


6-Apr-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
HAMPSHIRE.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,

 On Wednesday the 24th June, 1807, between the hours of four and six o’clock in the afternoon, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield,
 A Valuable FREEHOLD ESTATE; comprising 74 A. 1 R. 12 P. within a Ring Fence, of excellent Arable and Meadow Land, capable of great improvement, situate under the Hawkley Hanger, in the Parish of Hawkley, in the occupation of Mess. Greentree and Bayley.

 Particulars may be had of Messrs. Butler, Havant; Mr. Greetham, Solicitor, Petersfield; Mr. John Greentree the tenant at Empshot; at the adjacent Market Towns; and of T. Willmer, Petersfield.

27-Apr-1807
Hampshire Telegraph

 As Mr. Fleet, of Charlton, in this County, was returning from Petersfield market, on Saturday evening last, he was stopped on the road by a footpad armed with a gun. Mr. F. attempted to ride off, but the villain, aware of his intention, gave his horse such a sudden and violent blow on the head, with the but end of the piece, as brought him to the ground. The miscreant then, having robbed Mr. F. of about 30l. decamped.


4-May-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
Notice to Creditors

 WHEREAS GEORGE PENNICOTT, late of Rogate, in the County of Sussex, Mercer and Victualler, hath executed an Assignment of all his Estate and Effects, dated the 15th day of September, 1806, to William Hurst, of Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, Baker; John White Fleetwood, of the same place, Brewer; Samuel Holloway, of the Borough of Southwark, Linen Draper; Charles Wilkinson and William Stephenson, of Basing-lane, in the City of London, Warehousemen, and Copartners; and Edward Hide, of the City of Chichester) in Copartnership with Thomas White, Grocer). All Person or Persons who have any Claims or Demands on the Estate and Effects of the said George Pennicott, are requested immediately to send an account thereof to Cornthwaite John Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield, Hants. And all Person or Persons who stand Indebted to the Estate of the said George Pennicott, are desired forthwith to pay the amounts into the hands of the said C. J. Hector, in order that a Dividend of the Estate and Effects of the said George Pennicott may be immediately made.—Petersfield, April 22d, 1807.


11-May-1807
Hampshire Chronicle
Members returned to serve in the New Parliament.

 Petersfield—Hylton Jolliffe, Esq. Hon. B. Gray.

15-May-1807
Stamford Mercury

 NEW PARLIAMENT.—The following elections are decided. Those names printed in italics are new members for the places they are returned for.
 Petersfield—H. Jolliffe, Esq. Hon. B. Gray (the latter in place of Hon. John William Ward).


25-May-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
By T. WILLMER,

 On the Premises, (late Poynter’s.) at Petersfield, on Wednesday, the 27th May, 1807,
 THREE valuable Cart Horses, four six-inch wheel Dung Carts, two Waggons, Plows, Harrows, Drags, and other good-conditioned Implements in Husbandry, late the property of Mrs. E. Eames, deceased, and removed from Soal Farm. The Sale to begin precisely at three o’clock in the afternoon.


13-Jun-1807
Oxford Journal
HOUSE OF COMMONS
LIST OF THE MEMBERS RETURNED TO SERVE IN THE NEW PARLIAMENT FOR THE SEVERAL COUNTIES, CITIES, BOROUGHS, &c. IN ENGLAND AND WALES, ALPHABETICALLY ARRANGED

 **** Those printed in Italics were not in the last Parliament. Those marked thus *, are new for the respective places. All the rest are re-elected. The figure after the name shews in how many Parliaments the Member has served. Those marked thus ¶, are returned for more than one place.

 Petersfield—H. Joliffe, 3, Hon. P. Gray.


4-Jul-1807
Oxford University and City Journal

Fairs in the ensuing week,—Friday, Petersfield, Portsmouth (14 days), Ringwood, and Stockbridge, Hants.

27-Jul-1807
Hampshire Telegraph

 MISSES WHEATLY respectfully informs their Friends and the Public, their SCHOOL will recommence on the 27th inst. and they flatter themselves, by continuing that personal attention to the improvement of their pupils, which has hitherto been so decidedly approved, they shall merit a continuance of the support and confidence so liberally bestowed by their Friends.
 Petersfield, July 11, 1807.


3-Aug-1807
Hampshire Telegraph

 FOUND, on Portsdown Hill on Monday last, a SILVER WATCH. The Owner on describing the same and paying the expence of this advertisement may have it again by applying to James Meers, at Steep Mill, near Petersfield.
 July 29, 1807

31-Aug-1807
Salisbury & Winchester Journal

 Lately was married, J. Mellish, Esq. of Godalming, Surry, to Miss Patrick, eldest daughter of E. Patrick, Esq. of Petersfield.


7-Sep-1807
Hampshire Chronicle
SADDLE HORSE DUTY.
NOTICE to all Persons Letting SADDLE HORSES to Hire.

 The Court of King’s Bench having lately determined, in the Cause of WELSFORD v TODD, that a Saddle Horse hired from one place to another and back, is a hireing within the meaning of the Act of the 44th of the King, and liable to the Duty of 1½ d per mile, We hereby give Notice, that attendance will be given at the under-mentioned times and places, by the Collector of the Post Horse Duty, who has proper authority to grant Licences and to deliver the proper Books and Tickets to all such persons as shall apply for the same; and that in any case any person who let Saddle Horses to hire shall neglect to attend and ‘take the proper Licence, &c. we shall be under the necessity of prosecuting such persons for the Penalties incurred, viz. 10l. for each offence.

JOHN SARGEAUNT, Esq 
TIMOTHY BRENT, Esq.
   Farmers of the Post Horse Duties arising on District 14.

THURSDAY, Sept. 10th.
Petersfield   Dolphin   M. 8 to 9


21-Sep-1807
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY

 LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES, issued in the County aforesaid, from July 1 to Sep. 00, 1807, pursuant to the Acts of parliament granting a Duty of 3l. 3s. on each Certificate.
  Names
 Andrews, Richard, esq.
 Blunt, William
 Bonham, Thomas, esq.
 Cannon, James
 King, Fielder, esq
 Leer, George
 Patrick, Edward, esq.
 Patrick, Edward, jun.
 Whicher, rev, John
All at Petersfield

21-Sep-1807
Hampshire Telegraph

Petersfield, September 18, 1807.

 The great Pond at Harting will be Fished on the twenty-ninth of this instant, when about One Thousand CARP, from four to eight pounds weight, will be offered for sale. Any Persons inclined to treat for the same, or any part thereof may know the terms on applying to Mr. Andrews, of Petersfield.


10-Oct-1807
Oxford University and City Herald
SPORTING FOOTPAD.

 This summer, the New Forest, in Hampshire, and the neighbourhood of Horn Dean, were infested by a footpad, armed with a gun, who was very successful in his depredations, and eluded all search; from whence it was supposed he had formed a retreat in the forest. His robberies were all committed in mid-day, and his appearance being that of a gentleman sportsman, he surprised the unwary traveller, before, if armed, he could prepare for his defence. He had, however, for some time disappeared, and hopes were entertained that he had changed the scene of his plunder and pillage. But the Portsmouth Telegraph, of Saturday, gives the following account of his re-appearance:
 “The footpad, armed with a gun, who has made himself notorious in this neighbourhood, by his frequent and undaunted robberies, has been very active this week in his depredations. Every night, we believe, he has stopped some persons, and robbed them, either upon the Chichester or London roads, and so artfully changing his ground as to elude search. On Wednesday night a little before eight o’clock, he stopped Mr. Astlett, coach-maker, of this town, who was on horseback, near the fir trees, on Gravel-hill, on Petersfield Downs, and robbed him of about 7l. Last night, he stopped a man and woman, midway between Havant and Emsworth, and took 30s. from them.”


2-Nov-1807
Hampshire Telegraph
White Hart Inn, Petersfield

 THOMAS COX, (late Book-keeper at Mr. Clarke’s Waggon Office, Portsmouth) takes the liberty of informing his Friends and the Public that he has taken the above Inn, which he has fitted up with every convenience for Gentlemen Travellers, and those attending Petersfield Market; and trusts that he shall meet with encouragement, as he has spared no expence in rendering the above Inn every way comfortable. To his beds he has paid the strictest attention; and also to the stabling. Wines neat as imported.  October 31, 1807


4-Dec-1807
Kentish Weekly or Canterbury Journal

Brighton, Nov 30.—On Saturday se’nnight, about six o’clock in the evening, as Mr. Nash and Mr. Rice, both of Chichester, were returning from Petersfield to that city, they were stopped near a place called Crow’s Hole, by a footpad, armed with a gun, who jumped suddenly from a hedge by the road side, and demanded with terrible threats, their money. Mr. Rice, who had a very considerable sum in his pocket, clapt spurs to his horse, and escaped without being robbed; but Mr. Nash, who was not so fortunately mounted, surrendered to the robber his watch, a few shillings in silver, and some half-pence. And on Tuesday evening, a gentleman named Brent, was robbed, between Emsworth and Havant, by a fellow, armed also with a gun, of his watch and some silver.


5-Dec-1807
Caledonian Mercury
FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE.
WHITEHALL—DEC. 1, 1807.

 Commissions signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the county of Renfrew.
 Archibald Campbell to be Lieutenant-Colonel, vice Petersfield, resigned; dated Oct. 23, 1807.

28-Dec-1807
Hampshire Chronicle

 A number of robberies were committed last week in the neighbourhood of Emsworth, Havant, and Petersfield. Mr. Knight, of the latter place, was robbed of a hunting watch and twelve shillings in silver. Mr. Madgwick, of Havant, Mr. Avenale, of Emsworth, and Mr. Baker, Captain of a vessel at Emsworth, were also robbed.

1808

4-Jan-1808
Hampshire Chronicle
EDUCATION

 AT Mr. BAYNTON’s SCHOOL, FROXFIELD, near Petersfield, Hants, YOUNG GENTLEMEN are genteely boarded and carefully instructed in the English Language, Writing, Arithmetic, Book keeping, Mensuration, Gauging, Geometry, Land-Surveying, and Planning, (Washing included) for 18 Guineas per Annum, and One Guinea Entrance.

The School re-opens January 25, 1808.
 As Mr. B. takes only a few Boarders, and prefers them from 5 to 10 years old, he solicits the attention of those Parents or Guardians who may have such Children to put to School, and assures them the strictest regard will be paid to their health, morals, and improvement.
The situation is extremely healthy.
 N.B. There will be no extra charges except for books &c.
18-Jan-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

Petersfield, January 6, 1808.

 The Misses Wheatly, return their most sincere thanks to their numerous Friends, for the unremitting support and confidence they continue to receive, and inform them their SCHOOL will recommence on the 25th instant, when (as usual,) the most affectionate attention will be paid to the comfort and happiness of their Pupils, and every exertion made for the improvement of their morals and understanding.


18-Jan-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 MR. T. PATRICK respectfully informs the Inhabitants of Petersfield and its vicinity, that an ASSEMBLY will be held at the Dolphin Inn, on Thursday, the 21st inst.
 Tickets to be had at the Dolphin Inn, at 4s. 6d. each.
 Petersfield, 13th January, 1808.


25-Jan-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 WHEREAS a Commission of Bankrupt is awarded and issued forth against JAMES BROWN the Younger, of Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, Fellmonger and Tanner, and he being declared a Bankrupt, is hereby required to surrender himself to the Commissioners in the said Commission named, or the major part of them, on Thursday, the 4th day of February next, at 2 o’clock in the afternoon; and on Friday, the fifth day of the same month , at eleven of the clock in the afternoon, and on Tuesday the Eighth day of March next, at one o’clock in the afternoon, at the house of Daniel Wise, called or known by the name or sign of the Ship and Castle, in Horndean, in the said County, then and there to be examined, and to make a full discovery and disclosure of his Estate and Effects, when and where the Creditors are to come prepared to prove their Debts, and at the second sitting to chuse Assignees, and at the last sitting the said Bankrupt is required to finish his examination, and the Creditors are to assent to or Dissent from the allowance of his Certificate. All persons indebted to the said Bankrupt, or that have any of his Effects, are not to pay or deliver the same but to whom the Commissioners shall appoint, but give notice thereof to Wm. Messum, of St. James-street, Portsea, Solicitor under the said Commision.


29-Jan-1808
Stamford Mercury

 BANKRUPTS.] James Brown, the younger, of Petersfield, co. Southampton, fellmonger and tanner.

30-Jan-1808
Northampton Mercury
BANKRUPTS required to SURRENDER.

 James Brown, jun. of Petersfield, Southamptonshire, fellmonger, Feb. 4, 5, and March 8, at the Ship-and-Castle, Horndean. Attorney, Mr. Messum, Portsea.


1-Feb-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 TO be Sold by Auction, at the George Inn, Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, on Friday, the 12th day of February, 1808, at the hour of 3 o’clock in the afternoon.
  Lot 1. All that Farm and Lands called SKINNER’s FARM, situate and being in the Tything of Sheet and Parish of Petersfield, and consisting of a Barn, Stable, Cowpens, and Farm Yard, and about 36A. 0R. 6P. customary measure, of Arable and Pasture Land, now in the occupation of Mr. Joseph Booker and held by Lease under Magdalen College, for a term of twenty years, renewable every seven, and of which about nineteen years are unexpired, at the yearly rent of 1l. 17s. and 7 bushels and 2 pecks of wheat, and one quarter and 2 bothels of malt.
  Lot 2. All that FREEHOLD MESSUAGE, TENEMENT, or DWELLINGHOUSE, together with convenient Outhouses, Garden, and a piece of Pasture Land behind the same, containing about an acre and a half, customary measure, now occupied by the said Joseph Booker, and situate on a pleasant eminence called Ramshill, within a quarter of a mile of the town of Petersfield, aforesaid.
  Lot 3. A FREEHOLD FARM HOUSE, Barn, Stable, Out-buildings, Yard, and Garden thereunto belonging, together with a Cottage, consisting of two Tenements and Farm, containing by estimation 33A. 1R. 27P. customary measure, of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, situate and being in the Parish of Liss, in the said county of Southampton, within three miles of Petersfield aforesaid, and adjoining the Turnpike Road leading from thence to London, in a good sporting country, and now occupied by the said Joseph Booker. For a view of the several Premises, apply to the respective Tenants, and for further particulars to

  C. J. HECTOR, Solicitor, Petersfield.


1-Feb-1808
Hampshire Chronicle
CHICHESTER
SATURDAY, JANUARY 30.

 It is with much satisfaction that we announce the apprehension of a notorious robber, who has for a long time past been so successful in his depredations, and created so much consternation in the counties of Sussex and Hants. The following are the particulars of his apprehension, and are very remarkable:—It will be remembered that Mr. Tribe, a respectable farmer, was a short time since fired at near his own house, and that his horse was wounded. It happened that a sawyer, whose name is John Pitt, had shot a pigeon, which was found by a countryman, and a bullet was extracted from it, which corresponded with those found in Mr. Tribe’s saddle, being of a peculiar from, and made of window lead: suspicion in consequences being entertained against him, he immediately sold his goods, quitted the country, and went to reside at Portsmouth. Here, however, he was not destined to remain quietly; for having tendered a watch to a Mr. Leggatt, of that place, in part of payment of a debt formerly contracted, it was discovered that the chain and seals hanging to it were the property of Mr. Brent, of Portsmouth, lately robbed; and this gentleman having identified them to be his, the man was taken into custody, and lodged in the White House;—where he made a full confession of his numerous robberies, several of which had been laid to the charge of Allen, who robbed Mr. Rhoades, and shot Captain Sargent, and who was shot himself by his pursuers, near Petworth.—Among the many robberies that Pitt has acknowledged, the following are the most interesting:—He shot at Mr. Chatfield, of Emsworth, for which a reward of 200 guineas was offered for the offender. He unintentionally fired at Mr. Tribe, his gun going off unexpectedly. He robbed Mr. Piggott, of Lavant; and Mr. Nash, of Chichester; also Mr. Pratt, chemist, of his gold watch and seal, which are now in the possession of a silversmith at Fareham, he having bought it of the robber about three months since; and Mr. Knight, of Petersfield, has owned the watch left with Mr. Leggatt, of Portsmouth, and sworn to the man in custody having robbed him of it: and as this happened in Sussex, we understand that he will take his trial in that county.


22-Feb-1808
Hampshire Telegraph
BOROUGH OF PETERSFIELD

To be disposed of by Private Contract, all those desirable and extensive FREEHOLD PREMISES, late in the occupation of Mr. Wm. Poynter, deceased, eligibly situated on the west side of the London Road leading into Petersfield; comprising two brick Dwelling-Houses, an extensive Orchard, well stocked with the choicest fruit trees, a capacious and productive Kitchen Garden, Large Barn, Stabling, and Outbuildings, with an acre and a quarter of rich Arable Land, and a Pond abundantly supplied with fine spring water. The whole Premises comprise about three acres, and are well worth the attention of those wanting extensive Premises for manufacture, commerce, or other speculative enterprise. For a view of the Premises, and further particulars, apply to Mr. Cannon, Solicitor, Petersfield.


14-Mar-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 WHEREAS, WILLIAM COX the Elder, late of Chichester, Dealer in Earthenware, a Bankrupt, now stands committed to the Jail for the County of Stafford, for not making satisfactory answers to certain questions put to him by the major part of the Commissioners touching the disclosure and discovery of his Estate and Effects:—and whereas many Crates or Packages of Earthen-ware lately sold and delivered to the said William Cox are entirely unaccounted for, and are suspected to be concealed in Chichester, Birdham, Petersfield, and the neighbourhood thereof. Notice is therefore given, that every Person having any Goods or Effects belonging to the Estate of the said William Cox in possession, and do not forthwith deliver up the same to John Bridger, of Chichester Messenger to the said Commission, will be prosecuted with the utmost rigour of the Law: and a Reward will be paid to any Person by whose information and means any such goods or Effects shall be recovered, in proportion to the value thereof.  Chichester, Feb. 22, 1808.

26-Mar-1808
Bristol Mirror

 Last week died at Clifton, in her 49th year, Mrs. Edward Shirley, the widow of Edward Shirley, Esq. of Spring Garden and Petersfield, in the island of Jamaica, after a severe illness of eleven weeks, which she bore with the utmost patience; she was a most valuable, tender, and affectionate mother, and has left her surviving and grievously afflicted daughters a bright example of piety and resignation to follow.


4-Apr-1808
Hampshire Telegraph
PETERSFIELD, HANTS.
To Tanners, Fellmongers, Builders, and Others.

 PEREMPTORILY to be Sold by Auction, (by order of the Assignees of James Brown, the younger, late of Petersfield, Fellmonger and Tanner, a Bankrupt,) by Messrs. WINDSORS, at the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, aforesaid, on Wednesday, the 27th of April, 1808, between the hours of four and five in the afternoon, the following valuable ESTATES, and TIMBER, which are highly worthy of the consideration of the Public.
  Lot 1. The REVERSION in FEE, expectant on the determination of the Life Estate of a Person aged 65 years, in all that respectable and convenient DWELLING-HOUSE, now occupied by Mr. James Brown, the Elder, TAN and FELLMONGER’s YARD, through which runs a continual stream of water, Barn, Stable, Bark-house, Sheds, and Tan-Pits, with every requisite apparatus for a Tanner, on a large seale; together with about six Acres of rich Meadow Land, lying contiguous thereto; situate in Sheet, about a quarter of a mile from the Turnpike Road, and about one mile from Petersfield. The above Estate stands on a declivity, and commands the most delightful prospects, and in all respects for eligibility of situation for a Tanner, can hardly be rivalled in the kingdom. The stream through the Tan Yard, is a fish stream, and runs with sufficient strength for the purpose of a water-mill.
  Lot 2. A FREEHOLD DWELLING-HOUSE and GARDEN, in the Spain, in Petersfield aforesaid, which has a vote for the Borough; to which a particular reference will be given by Mr. Charles Greetham, Solicitor, of Petersfield.
  Lot 3. The ANNUAL FEE-FARM RENTS, payable out of certain FREEHOLD ESTATES within the Borough of Petersfield, amounting to 4l. 10s.
  Lot 4. Several valuable TREES of OAK, ASH, and FIR, which, for the accommodation of Purchasers, will be divided into different lots.
  For further particulars apply at the Office of Mr. Messum, Solicitor, St. James’s-street; where Estates are registered for sale gratis, and Persons inclined to purchase may inspect such registers gratis; at which Office are now for sale nearly 200 Estates not advertised.


18-Apr-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 Mr. Jolliffe, the Member for Petersfield, is appointed his Majesty’s Governor of the settlement of Surinam.


16-May-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 ASHFORD estate, Hants.—The Sale of this Estate is unavoidably POSTPONED until the 17th day of June next, before which time further particulars of the Estate will be given. C. J. HECTOR, Solicitor,
  Petersfield, 11th May, 1808.


30-May-1808
Salisbury & Winchester Jornal
CAPITAL FARM,—ASHFORD, HANTS

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by T. WILLMER, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, on Friday the 17th day of June, 1808, at three o’clock in the afternoon,—All that desirable and compact Farm, called ASHFORD FARM, situate and being in the several parishes of Steep and Froxfield, in the said county of Southampton, now in the occupation of Mr. R. M. Baker, the proprietor; consisting of a good and substantial farm-house, with convenient out-offices of every description, stabling for 14 horses, three barns and other convenient out-buildings, a good garden, and about an acre of valuable orchard ground; five cottages, comprising eight tenements, together with 243 statute acres (more or less) of arable, meadow, pasture, wood, and coppice ground; four marl pits are open on different parts of the farm, with rock and chalk pits bordering thereon: the whole lies compact, nearly in a ring fence, and has an unlimited right on Ashford and Steep Commons, and is now in the occupation of Mr. R. M. Baker, the proprietor, except about nine acres, let on lease to Mr. J. Meeres for a term of 21 years, of which 17 will be unexpired at Michaelmas next.—This very valuable and desirable estate lies about two miles from Petersfield, nine from Alton and Alresford, and 18 from Farnham (all good market towns), in a vale charmingly rural and romantic, in a good sporting country abounding with game, and has a good trout stream running through the garden, and the turnpike road from Portsmouth to Alton and Farnham runs through the estate, about half a mile from the dwelling-house. The lands are in the highest state of cultivation, having been exclusively occupied by the several proprietors upwards of 100 years past, are exceeded by none in point of fertility, and deservedly classes with the first farms in Hampshire. The buildings, gates, and fences on the farm are in excellent repair and condition.—About 12 acres of the above farm are Freehold, six acres Leasehold for 1000 years, and the remainder Copyhold of Inheritance (nearly equal to freehold) under the several Manors of Eastmeon and Ashford; and the Land-tax of the whole is redeemed.—The Tithes of that part of the farm lying in the parish of Steep are held by Lease for 21 years, at 18 l., of which 12 years will be unexpired at Michaelmas next, at which time possession of the farm will be given.
  For a view of the estate apply to Mr. Baker, the proprietor, and for further particulars to C. J. Hector, solicitor, Petersfield.


1-Jun-1808
Morning Post

 HANTS.—CAPITAL ESTATES and MANORS.—To be SOLD by PRIVATE CONTRACT, a most desirable FREEHOLD ESTATE, comprising a mansion house and offices, large park, and several farms, containing altogether upwards of 2000 statute acres, abounding with game, and in the neighbourhood of several packs of hounds; 51 miles distant from London, and four miles from a market town.—For particulars, enquire of Mr. Greetham, Solicitor, Petersfield, Hants.—Letters post paid.


13-Jun-1808
Oxford Journal
HOUSE OF COMMONS
LIST OF THE MEMBERS RETURNED TO SERVE IN THE NEW PARLIAMENT FOR THE SEVERAL COUNTIES, CITIES, BOROUGHS, &c. IN ENGLAND AND WALES, ALPHABETICALLY ARRANGED

 **** Those printed in Italics were not in the last Parliament. Those marked thus *, are new for the respective places. All the rest are re-elected. The figure after the name shews in how many Parliaments the Member has served. Those marked thus ¶, are returned for more than one place.

 Petersfield—H. Joliffe, 3, Hon. P. Gray.

28-Jun-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 At the Parsonage, Buriton, near Petersfield, Hants.—Seminary, for a limited number of Pupils. The Rev. W. WELLS, begs leave to inform his Friends, that his proposed Establishment of Pupils, will commence on Monday, July 18th, 1808, when he will be prepared to receive any young Gentlemen entrusted to his care and Tuition. Terms, 40 Guineas per Annum, Five Guineas entrance. Cards, specifying the branches of Education the Pupils are instructed in, with other particulars, may be had by applying by letter (post paid) to Mr. Moy Thomas, Solicitor, Brighton; Mr. Bradford, Chichester; Mr. James Ralfe, Solicitor, Southampton; or the Rev. W. Wells, at the Parsonage.


4-Jul-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 To Maltsters, Mealmen, and others.—Hants.—To be SOLD, by AUCTION, by Messrs. WHITE and SON, on Wednesday the 20th of July, 1808, precisely at three o’clock in the afternoon, at the George Inn, Petersfield, in one Lot,
  A very desirable FREEHOLD ESTATE, comprising a capital firm-built Malt-House, now in full trade, and capable of wetting thirty quarters per week; with good Store-room, that will contain 300 quarters of corn: together with a large yard and covered gate-way in front of the Street; an excellent Garden, walled-in, and planted with rare fruit trees. Good stabling, pig pounds, and other convenient out-buildings: with a Right of Common to turn out cattle. In front of the above Premises, is a capital Dwelling-House, comprising the following apartments: first floor—one front and one back parlour, kitchen, brew-house, milk-house, convenient pantries, and good cellars; second floor—three front and two back chambers. These Premises are in the occupation of Mr. James Farren, Maltster, situated in a most convenient and pleasant part of Petersfield, called Spain, where a very considerable business has been conducted for a number of years. Immediate possession will be given of the Malt-house, Stable and Yard; and of the House and Garden, at Michaelmas next. The Estate may be viewed, by applying to Mr. James Farren, on the Premises, and for further particulars, to Messrs. White and Son, North-street, Chichester.


15-Jul-1808
Kentish Weekly or Canterbury Journal

 One day last week a Mr. Wakeford, a respectable yeoman, near Petersfield, in Hampshire, was assisting his men, in the hay-field, he had the misfortune to slip from a loaded waggon, with a considerable portion of its contents, which completely buried him, and it was feared fatally, as he made no effort to rise, and on the removal of the hay, appeared quite dead, with one of his arms pierced through with the point of a pitchfork he had been using, which remained in the wound. A surgeon was immediately sent for, who, on his arrival, produced symptoms of life; after which Mr. Wakeford was conveyed home, in a doubtful state, but he now lies in a fair way of recovery.

18-Jul-1808
Hampshire Telegraph

 EDUCATION.—At Mr. BAYNTON’s SCHOOL, FROXFIELD, near Petersfield, Hants, young gentlemen are genteelly Boarded and carefully Instructed in the English Language, Writing, Arithmetic, Book-keeping, Mensuration, Gauging, Geometry, Land Surveying, and Planning, for 18 Guineas per annum, and one Guinea entrance. The School re-opens July 25th, 1808. As Mr. B. takes but few Boarders, and prefers them from 5 to 10 years old, he solicits the attention of those Parents or Guardians who may have such Children to put to School; and assures them the strictest regard will be paid to their health, morals, and improvement. The situation is extremely healthy. N.B. There will be no extra charges, except for Books, &c.


18-Aug-1808
Morning Chronicle
DIVIDENDS.

 September 12, Samuel Burnett, late of Petersfield, Southampton, victualler—Robert Uren, late of Petersfield, Southampton, fellmonger.

19-Aug-1808
Kentish Gazette
Bankruptcy superseded.
Dividends in the Country.

 Sept. 12. Sam. Burnett, Petersfield, Southampton, victualler, dealer and chapman.
 Sept. 12. Rob. Uren, Petersfield, Southampton, fellmonger.


22-Aug-1808
Hampshire Telegraph
PETERSFIELD, HANTS

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Mr. W. FRY, in the Market Place, facing the George Inn, on Wednesday the 30th day of August, 1808, precisely at twelve o’clock, several useful Saddle, Gig & Draught HORSES; one London –built GIG, with Head and plated Harness, GIGS, &c. N. B. Ladies or Gentlemen having Horses or Carriages to dispose of are requested to give an early notice.—Orders received at his Repository, Fountain Inn, Portsmouth; or at Mr. Holdaway’s, George Inn, Petersfield.


27-Aug-1808
Northampton Mercury

Anecdote of Sir Roger Curtis.—The mirth and good-humour natural to this gallant officer frequently led him into many pleasant adventures. Having received orders while in London to take the command of a squadron, and hoist his flag on board the Formidable, at Portsmouth, he travelled, for dispatch, without servants, plainly dressed, in the mail-coach. As it frequently happens in this sort of conveyance, the passengers were unknown to each other, Sir Roger found himself in company with a young man, who proved, by his uniform, to be a mate of one of the east-Indiamen then lying at the Motherbank. When they had proceeded within a few miles of Petersfield, the young officer pulled out some bread and cheese from a bundle, and invited his fellow-travellers to eat. During their repast he entertained them with sea phrases, which induced the Admiral jocosely to ask him many simple questions relating nautical tactics; among others, he demanded how sailors could see at night, and whether they were not compelled to tie the ship to a post or tree until morning? The mate was not backward in bestowing a few hearty d—ns upon the ignorance and lubberly lingo of the Admiral, who laughed heartily at the joke; and he not only bore the rough observations of the sailor with good humour, but the contemptuous grins of his fellow-passengers. On their arrival at Portsmouth, the Admiral shook hands with the mate, and went on board his ship. The same day Sir Roger came on shore in his broad gold-laced hat and uniform; he was attended by several of his bargemen, and while walking up Point-street, he met his late fellow-passenger, the mate of the Indiaman. Before the latter could recover from his surprise, Sir Roger accosted him with, “What cheer, messmate? You see I am not the lubber you took me for; but come, as I breakfasted out of your locker this morning, you shall splice the main-brace with me this evening, then you may square your yards and run before the wind to the Motherbank.” The mate, with astonishment, apologized, as well as he was able, for the liberty he had taken with the Admiral; who soon released him from his embarrassment, and advised him(over a bottle) never to be decoyed in future by false colours, but to look sharply at the mould and trim of every vessel he met before he suffered her to surprise him.


19-Sep-1808
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.

 A LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES issued in the County aforesaid to the 4th of September, 1808: (concluded from our last) (all from Petersfield)
  Bonham, Thomas, esq.
  Blunt, William
  Canning, James
  Greetham, Charles
  King, Fielder, esq.
  Leer, George
  Meers, John
  Parsons, John
  Patrick, Edward, esq.
  Patrick, Edward, jun.
  Whicher, rev. John


16-Oct-1808
The Examiner
DIVIDENDS.

 Nov. 15. J. Brown, jun. Petersfield, fellmonger.

19-Oct-1808
Kentish Gazette
Dividends in the Country.

 Nov. 15. James Brown the younger, Petersfield, Southampton, fellmonger.


28-Nov-1808
Hampshire Telegraph
SUSSEX.—TO BREWERS AND OTHERS.

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by T. WILLMER, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Wednesday the 7th day of December, 1808, between the hours of two and four in the afternoon, according to the Conditions of Sale to be then and there produced, (unless disposed of in the mean time by Private Contract, of which notice will be given);
  Lot 1. All that FREEHOLD MESSUAGE, Dwelling-house, Woodhouse, Garden and convenient Offices, now used as a Public House, and known by the sign of the RED LION, situate in the pleasant village of Rogate, and in the High Road from Petersfield to Midhurst, now in the occupation of Mrs. Rassel, tenant at will.
  Lot 2. All that MESSUAGE, Garden, and Premises, situate in Elsted Marsh, now in the occupation of Mr. Pulpit, tenant at will.
 N. B. The last Lot is held on Three Lives, under the manor of Trayford. For particulars enquire of Mr. Greetham, Solicitor; or T. Willmer, Petersfield; and for a sight of the Premises, to the tenants.


19-Dec-1808
Hampshire Chronicle
NEWTON VALENCE, HANTS.
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION

 At the George Inn, Petersfield, Hants, on Wednesday the 11th day of January, 1809, at three o’clock in the afternoon, unless previously disposed of by Private Contract.
  A FREEHOLD ESTATE, called Van Farm, comprising a Barn, Stable, Yard, and Fifty Acres of Arable Land, situated in the parish of Newton Valence, in the county of Southampton.
  Full particulars may be known on application to Mr. KERBY, Solicitors, Alrysford, who is authorised to treat by Private Contract.

26-Dec-1808
Hampshire Chronicle
NEWTON VALENCE, HANTS. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION,
At the George Inn, Petersfield,
By M. DIMMOCK,

 On Wednesday the 18th (instead of the 11th as appeared in our last week’s paper) day of January, 1809, at three o’clock in the afternoon, unless previously disposed of by Private Contract.
  A VERY Compact and Desirable FREEHOLD ESTATE, called Van Farm; comprising a Barn, Stable, Yard, and Fifty Acres of excellent Arable Land, situated in the parish of Newton Valence, in the county of Southampton, and now in the possession of Mr. UNDERWOOD, the Proprietor.
  Possession may be had on completion of the purchase.
  Further Particulars may be known on application to Mr. Kirby, Solicitor, Alresford, who is authorised to treat by Private Contract.

1809

16-Jan-1809
Hampshire Telegraph

 THE MISSES WHEATLY, grateful for the very flattering encouragement they have received, return most sincere thanks to their numerous Friends for the same, and inform them, their School will re-commence on the 23rd instant,
  Petersfield, Jan. 11, 1809.

23-Jan-1809
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER,
SATURDAY, JANUARY 21.

 On Friday se’nnight died, at Recksdale, the seat of Earl Ferrers, the Lady of Hiton Jolliffe, Esq. M. P. for Petersfield.


30-Jan-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
Post Horse Duty.

 WHEREAS by the Act of the 48th George the third, Cap. 98. Sec. 5. It is enacted, that all Licenses therefore granted for letting Horses to hire, should respectively end and expire on the 31st day of January, 1800.—Notice is hereby given, to Postmasters, Inn-keepers, and others requiring Licenses within District 14, comprising the counties of Hants and Berks, that the same are ready to be granted by the Farmers of the said Duties, at their Office in Petersfield, in the said county of Hants; but, for the convenience of Persons residing at distant places, Licenses, Tickets, and Books, will be ready for delivery in the ensuing week, at the usual places of Collection, in Hampshire, Berkshire, and the Isle of Wight, by the Farmers of the said Duties, or their Deputies, who will attend for that purpose.

JAS. WHITE & C. J. HECTOR,

Farmers of the said Duties.  


6-Mar-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
To Builders and others

 TO be SOLD, a large quantity of FIR POLES, from ten to twenty-five Feet in length, &ensp'For further particulars apply to Mr. J. A. Minchin, Timber-Merchant, Petersfield.


6-Mar-1809
Hampshire Chronicle
PRIOR’s DEAN AND COLEMORE INCLOSURE.

 I, RICHARD EYLES, Esq. the Commissioner named and appointed in and by an Act of Parliament made and passed in the forty-eighth year of the reign of his present Majesty, intitled, “An Act for inclosing Lands in the Manor of Priors Dean and Colmar otherwise Colemore, in the county of Southampton,”

DO HEREBY GIVE NOTICE,
 That I have, pursuant to the directions contained in the said Act, and in a certain other Act of Parliament made and passed in the forty-first year of the reign of his present Majesty, intitled, “An Act for consolidating in one Act certain provisions usually inserted in Acts of Inclosure, and for facilitating the mode of proving the several facts usually required on the passing of such Acts,”—set out and appointed the following
PUBLIC CARRIAGE ROADS,
(THAT IS TO SAY)
PRIOR’s DEAN ROADS.
 One Public Carriage and Drift Road, of the width of thirty feet, leading from Priorsdean along by the Cottages in a South Westerly Direction to the Gate at the South West Corner of Prior’s Dean Corner, being part of the road from Prior’s Dean to Petersfield.
  One other Public Carriage and Drift Road, of the width of thirty feet, leading from Prior’s Dean, along the East side of Prior’s Dean Common, to the ancient Lane by Old Court House, along the said Lane, and continuing along the North East side of the said Common, to Snow Down Corner.
  One other Public Carriage and Drift Road, of the width of thirty feet, leading from Colemore Lane End, along the fence adjoining Windmill Farm, in a Southern Westerly direction, to the last mentioned Road at Snow Down Corner; and from thence, in a Westerly direction, towards and unto a certain Road in the parish of Froxfield, being part of the Road from Colemore to Petersfield.
COLEMORE ROADS.
One other Public Carriage and Drift Road, over Colemore Common, of the width of thirty feet, being part of the present Turnpike Road leading from Alresford to Petersfield.
  One other Public Carriage and Drift Road, of the width of thirty feet, leading out of the said Turnpike Road, opposite the Cottages, in a Westerly direction, to Eastmeon Lane End, being part of the Public Road leading from Alton to Eastmeon. One other Public Carriage and Drift Road, of the width of thirty feet, leading out of the said Turnpike Road, opposite the last described Road, in a South Westerly direction, being part of the Public Carriage Road leading to Colemore.
  One other Public Carriage and Drift Road, of the width of thirty feet, leading out of the said Turnpike Road, at the South West Corner of Colemore Common, along the West side of the said Common, to the Gate leading into Basing Park; and from thence, taking an Easterly direction, to the Turnpike Road leading from Gosport to London.
AND I DO GIVE FURTHER NOTICE,
That I have caused the said Public Highways to be marked and staked out, and a Map thereof deposited in the Office of PETER KERBY, of New Alresford, in the said county, Solicitor, for the inspection and perusal of all persons concerned.
And I do hereby give further Notice,
That I shall attend at the Trooper public house, in the parish of Froxfield, in the same county, on Tuesday the twenty-first day of March next, at twelve o’clock in the forenoon, for the purpose of hearing objections to the said Roads; at which Meeting any person injured or aggrieved, by the setting out the said Roads, or by not setting out or appointing any other Public Roads or Ways in, over, or upon the said Lands, by the said Act of the forty-eighth year of the King, directed to be inclosed, are requested to attend.
  Given under my hand, this twenty-fourth day of February, 1809.

RICHARD EYLES.   


13-Mar-1809
Hampshire Telegraph

Petersfield, Feb. 26th 1809.

 AT a MEETING of the INN-HOLDERS, PUBLICANS, &c. at the above Place, it was unanimously agreed to call a Meeting of the Inn-Holders, Publicans, &c. of the whole County of Hants, at the George Inn Winton, (being the centre of the County) on Monday the 13th of March, at eleven o’clock in the forenoon, for the purpose of presenting a PETITION to PARLIAMENT for RELIEF of the very great BURTHENS, they have for a considerable time past experienced and still continue so to do, of QUARTERING SOLDIERS, and other matters relative thereto.
  It is particularly requested all who can attend will make a point of so doing.


10-Apr-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
Oak and Ash Timber.

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Mr. THOMAS WILMER, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, at three o’clock on Saturday, the 15th day of April, 1809;—The following lots of TIMBER, now standing and growing in the parish of Steep, two miles from Petersfield.
  Lot 1. Seventy OAK TREES, with Lop, Top, and Bark.
  Lot 2. Thirty-five ASH TREES, by measure, when felled. Hammer marked T. H..
  Mr. Fielder, the tenant, will shew the timber; and for further particulars enquire of Mr. Thomas Hillyer, Timber Surveyor, Emsworth.


22-May-1809
Hampshire Telegraph

 NEXT OF KIN.—The Next of Kin of LADY HARTOPP, Widow of Sir John Hartopp, Bart. Whose name, before her intermarriage with Sir John, was Marsh, are requested to apply, by letter, to Messrs. Allen, Clifford’s-inn, London; or Mr. Greetham, solicitor, Petersfield, Hants.


19-Jun-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
SUSSEX.

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by THOMAS WILLMER, at the Red Lion Inn, in Petersfield, on Tuesday the 20th of June, 1809, at four o’clock in the afternoon, in four lots;—One Thousand and Eight OAK TILLARS, lately cut and barked, and Sixty-nine ASH TILLARS, now lying in several Coppices in the parish of Hasting, in the county of Sussex.

 Further particulars may be known on application to Thomas Pinke, of Hastings.


24-Jul-1809
Hampshire Chronicle
NEW TURNPIKE ROAD,
Between Winchester and Petersfield.
  IT is proposed to apply to Parliament for an Act to make a Turnpike Road to branch of an Avington Down, on the Winchester and Alresford Turnpike Road, to go through Cheriton, Bramdean, by Arnold’s Hut, Bording, and the Seven Stars, into Petersfield and Alton Turnpike Road at Wootton Gate, about a mile out of Petersfield. It will be found there will be a saving of about four or five miles, and a great many hills, particularly Stoner Hill. The attendance of those Gentlemen who would wish to promote this undertaking is earnestly requested at a Meeting to be held at the Fox Inn, at Bramdean, on Monday, the 31st instant, for the purpose of making Subscriptions, and other necessary arrangements, when and where a Plan of the intended Road may be seen, as well as an Estimate of the Expences of making the same.
31-Jul-1809
Salsibury & Winchester Journal
WINCHESTER.
SATURDAY, JULY 29.
  On Wednesday the 87th regiment of foot marched from this city for Petersfield

5-Aug-1809
Morning Chronicle

 MRS. ALICE CRUTCHLEY.—Mrs. Alice Crutchley, Widow, who, in the year 1773, resided in Gerrard-street, Soho, London, if living, is requested to apply to Messrs. Allen, Clifford’s Inn, London; or Mr. Greatham, solicitor, Petersfield, Hants; and if dead, any person who can inform when and where the said Alice Crutchley died, is requested to apply as above.


4-Sep-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
NEW TURNPIKE ROAD,
Between Winchester and Petersfield
  At a Meeting, held on the 31st of July last, at the Fox Inn, in Bramdean, for the purpose of taking into consideration the propriety of applying to Parliament for an Act to make a Turnpike Road, to branch off on Avington Down, on the Winchester and Alresford Turnpike Road, to go through the villages of Cheriton and Bramdean, by Arnold’s Hut, Bording, and the Seven Stars, into the Petersffield and Alton Turnpike Road, at or near Weston Toll Gate, about half a mile out of Petersfield,;—it was resolved, that another Meeting should be called, to make further Subscriptions and other necessary arrangements; and in obedience to which resolution, it is hereby requested, that those Gentlemen who would wish to support the measure, will meet at the White Hart Inn, in Winchester, on Wednesday the 6th instant, at twelve o’clock at noon, for the above purposes, when and where a Plan of the intended Road may be seen, as well as an Estimate of the Expences of making the same.
18-Sep-1809
Hampshire Chronicle

  NOTICE is hereby given, That an Application is intended to be made to Parliament, in the next Sessions, for an Act to make and maintain a convenient Carriage Road from the Winchester and Alresford Turnpike Road, to branch off on Avington Down, in the parish of Avington, to the Town of Petersfield, or to join the Petersfield and Alton Turnpike Road, at or near Weston Toll-Gate, in the parish of Weston, which said Road passes or is intended to pass through the several parishes of Avington, Easton, Ovington, Titchborne, Cheriton, Kilmeston, Hinton Amptner, Bramdean, Westmeon, Privet, Eastmeon, Froxfield, Weston, and Petersfield, in the county of Southampton.—Dated the 2d Sept. 1809.


22-Sep-1809
Kentish Gazette

 On Wednesday last, Thomas Morgan, late Master of his Majesty’s ship Tyrian, was brought up to the Town Hall, Portsmouth, on a charge of having stabbed Mr. Charles Stewart, taylor of Corsham. It appeared in evidence, that as Mr. Morgan and a lady were returning from Petersfield, they stopped at the Bricklayer’s Arms, Corsham, when Mr. Stewart asked Morgan to permit him to blow a horn, which was pending at the latter’s side; upon which Mr. Morgan exclaimed—“You damned rascal, how could you think of asking a gentleman of my cloth such a question?” Stewart begged pardon, and said he meant no harm; Morgan continued—“You are a damned impertinent fellow—if you do not take care, I will send you on board the Royal Billy, before to-morrow night.” Stewart replied, he was not afraid of that. Morgan then went into the public house, and in a short time after, apparently in a vehement rage came out, and, jumping into the gig, he took up one of the cushions, and threw it down with violence; he then took up the other and from under it, a dirk, which he instantly drew, exclaiming—“Now you damned rascal!” and immediately ran towards Stewart (who had been standing quietly near the horses) who, perceiving he was pursued by Morgan ran up and down the street, until he fell down upon his hands and knees, when Morgan came up with him, and, with his extended arm, apparently with all the force he was master of, gave Stewart a violent stab with his dirk on the right side of his back, exclaiming at the same time “you d—d rascal.” Stewart gave a loud scream, and with a violent effort recovered his legs, and ran towards his own house; Morgan again following him, with his drawn dagger, Stewart, however, ran into the Blue Anchor to avoid Morgan, who was only a few yards behind him. Morgan, did not follow him into the house, but repaired to the Bricklayer’s Arms, where he was immediately taken into custody.


23-Sep-1809
Oxford University & City Herald

A Furious Assault.— On Wednesday last, Tho. Morgan, late master of his Majesty’s ship Tyrian, was brought up to the Town-hall, Portsmouth, on a charge of having stabbed Mr. Charles Stewart, taylor of Cosham. It appeared in evidence, that as Mr. Morgan and a lady were returning from Petersfield, they stopped at the Bricklayer’s Arms, Cosham, when Mr. Stewart asked Morgan to permit him to blow a horn, which was pending at the latter’s side; upon which Mr. Morgan exclaimed—“You damned rascal, how could you think of asking a gentleman of my cloth such a question?” Stewart begged pardon, and said he meant no harm; Morgan continued—“You are a damned impertinent fellow—if you do not take care, I will send you on board the Royal Billy, before to-morrow night.” Stewart replied, he was not afraid of that. Morgan then went into the public house, and a short time after, apparently in a vehement rage, came out, and, jumping into the gig, he took up one of the cushions, and threw it down with violence; he then took up the other and from under it, a dirk, which he instantly drew, exclaiming—“Now you damned rascal!” and immediately ran towards Stewart (who had been standing quietly near the horses), who, perceiving he was pursued by Morgan, ran up and down the street, until he fell down upon his hands and knees, when Morgan came up with him, and, with his extended arm, apparently with all the force he was master of, gave Stewart a violent stab with the dirk on the right side of his back, exclaiming at the same time “you d—d rascal.”—Stewart gave a loud scream, and with a violent effort recovered his legs, and ran towards his own home, Morgan again following him, with his drawn dagger. Stewart, however, ran into the Blue Anchor to avoid Morgan, who was only a few yards behind him. Morgan, did not follow him into the house, repaired to the Bricklayer’s-arms, where he was immediately taken into custody. Mr. Stewart is not out of danger.


27-Sep-1809
Morning Post

 MARRIED—On the 24th inst. at Petersfield, Hants, Captain Robert Pearce, to Miss Sarah Seward, of Sheet Cottage, near Petersfield, an accomplished and amiable Young Lady.


2-Oct-1809
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.
  A LIST of GAME CERTIFICTAES issued in the County aforesaid, to the 9th of September, 1809.
Concluded from our last.
     (all at Petersfield)
  Andrews, Richard, esq.
  Bonham, Thomas, esq.
  Cannon, James
  Greatham, Charles
  King, Fielder, esq.
  Leer, George
  Patrick, Thomas
3-Oct-1809
Kentish Gazette

 At the Hampshire Annual Sheep Shew, held at Petersfield on Tuesday last, a considerable number of stock of different kinds were exhibited for inspection, and most of the amateurs of agricultural excellence in the neighbourhood attended.


23-Oct-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
PETERSFIELD ASSEMBLY.
  The First Subscription Assembly will be held at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Friday the 27th inst. No person can be admitted, unless introduced by a Subscriber.—N.B. Admission Tickets, 5s. each, to be had of Mr. Patrick, Dolphin.
23-Oct-1809
Hampshire Telegraph

 MR. STRANGWAYS, Surgeon, &c. Petersfield, intends practising the several branches of his profession, viz. SURGERY, PHARMACY, and MIDWIFERY: he hopes, by unremitting attention, to merit the confidence and support of the town and neighbourhood of Petersfield.


6-Nov-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
A New Day Coach to London
  COACH and WAGGON OFFICE, No. 45 Broad-street, Point, PORTSMOUTH (opposite the Star and Garter); and the original Office, No. 112, Queen-street, Portsea. A New DAY COACH, in 12 hours, every morning at five o’clock; and an improved NIGHT COACH, every evening at half-past five o’clock; both through Petersfield, Godalming, Guildford, and the most pleasant and cheerful route, passing Lord Onslow’s Park, at Clandon, by Horsley, Effingham, Bookham, Leatherhead, and Epsom, to the Coach-Offices, No. 11, Gracechurch-street; Belle Sauvage, Ludgate-hill; Bull and Mouth, Bull and Mouth Street; and the Cannon Hotel, Charing-Cross, London; and return every morning and evening at the same hours, from the above Offices, by the same route, to Portsmouth and Portsea.—WAGGONS daily, to the White Horse, Friday-street, and Black Bear, Piccadilly, London.
  ☞ Not accountable for Money, Jewels, Writings, Watches, Rings, Lace, or Glass, if damaged or lost, nor any Parcel above five pounds value, unless entered and paid for according to its value.

Performed by JOHN PETERS and Company.  

13-Nov-1809
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
NOTICE TO DEBTORS AND CREDITORS.
  ALL persons having Demands on the Estate of the late THOMAS SILVESTER, of Froxfield, in the county of Southampton, deceased, are requested to send an account thereof to Mr. William Silvester, of Froxfield aforesaid, or Mr. James White, of Purbrook, the Executors and Trustees, or to their Solicitor, Mr. Cornthwaite John Hector, of Petersfield: and all persons indebted to the said Estate, are requested forthwith to pay the amount of their respective Debts to the said Executors or their Solicitor.
  PETERSFIELD, Oct. 30, 1809.

1-Dec-1809
Kentish Weekly or Canterbury Journal
MARKETS, FAIRS, &c.
Principal Fairs in December, for Cattle, Horses, Sheep, &c.

 Dec. 11, … Petersfield

4-Dec-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
FROXFIELD, HANTS

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Order of the Executors of the late Thomas Silvester, deceases, on the Premises, by T. WILLMER, on Saturday the 9th day of December, 1809, at 11 o’clock in the forenoon, (subject to the Conditions to be then and there produced);—An unexpired Term of Four Years from Michaelmas last, of and in the Lease of a Farm, called, BOWER FARM, situate in Froxfield aforesaid, and containing by estimation, about 230 customary Acres of Arable, Meadow, and Copse Land, all of which is in the highest state of Cultivation. After which will be Sold, All and Singular, the Live and Dead FARMING STOCK, on the Farm, consisting of 10 capital cart horses, 2 Norman cows, 4 waggons, 2 dung carts, 3 sets of harness, about 50 tons of hay, and various other implements of husbandry, as expressed by catalogue.
  For further Particulars, apply to Messrs. Silvester and White, the Executors; or Cornthwaite John Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield.
  Several Copyhold Estates, situate in Froxfield, in the county of Southampton, called GREEN FARM, RIDGES and GEORGES FARMS, late the Property of the said Thomas Silvester, deceased, will be Sold by Auction some time in January next, of which due notice will be given.


14-Dec-1809
Derby Mercury
BANKRUPTS FROM SATURDAY’s GAZETTE

 John Smith, North Warnborough, Southampton, sackmaker, Dec. 21, 22, Jan. 20, at the George Inn, Odiam. Attorney, Mr. Hector, Petersfield.


18-Dec-1809
Hampshire Telegraph
FROXFIELD, HANTS
Freehold and Copyhold Estates.

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by T. WILLMER, on Monday the 22d day of January, 1810, at the George Inn, Petersfield, at three o’clock in the afternoon, agreeable to conditions of sale to be then and there produced;—The following Freehold and Copyhold ESTATES, late the property of Mr. Thomas Silvester, of Bower Farm, in Froxfield, deceased.
  Lot 1. A FARM HOUSE, with a garden and orchard, barn, stable, cow-pens, granary, cart-house, and other out-buildings, together with about 75 customary Acres (more or less) of arable and meadow Land, pleasantly situated on the Green, near the Church, in Froxfield aforesaid, and known by the name of Green Farm.
  Lot 2. Comprising a very substantial and roomy BARN, recently built, and about 50 customary Acres (more or less) of Arable and Meadow LAND, adjoining Lot 1, and known by the name of George’s Farm.
  Lot 3. A good BARN; and about 54 customary Acres (more or less) of Arable, Meadow, and Coppice LAND, situate at Ridge, near the Blacksmith’s Shop, and at a short distance from the preceding Lots.
  Lot 4. A piece of Freehold Arable LAND, situate on the Barnet, and containing 24A. 3R. 25P. statute measure, more or less. Lot 5. A piece of Copyhold Arable LAND, adjoining Lot 4. Containing 16A. 2R. 38P. (more or less) statute measure.
  Lot 6. A Thatched COTTAGE, in the occupation of W. Pearce, situate on Froxfield Green
  Lot 7. A Thatched COTTAGE, late in the occupation of Mrs. Silvester, adjoining the Free School.
  N.B. Lots 4 and 5 are Allotments on Froxfield Barnet, and are enclosed by a good quickset fence, recently planted. All the foregoing Estates, except Lot 4, are Copyhold, held under the Bishop of Winchester.—The Land throughout will be found in excellent condition, and in a high state of cultivation. All Tillers, Timber, and Underwood to be taken at a fair valuation; and also the Chalk lyng on Lot 4, to be paid for exclusively.
  The foregoing premises may be viewed by applying to W. Pearce, at Froxfield Green; and further particulars known by applying to Mr. Wm. Silvester, Froxfield; to C. J. Hector, Solicitor; or to T. Willmer, Auctioneer, Petersfield.

1810

8-Jan-1810
Hampshire Telegraph

 All persons having any claim or demand on Mr. RICHARD MARTIN BAKER, of Steep, Hants, are requested to transmit an account thereof to Mr. Greetham, Solicitor, Petersfield; and all persons who are indebted to the said Mr. Baker, are desired to pay the same to Mr. Greetham, on or before the 1st day of March next.
  Petersfield, Jan. 6, 1810.

29-Jan-1810
Hampshire Telegraph

 All Persons who have any Claim or Demands upon the Estate and Effects of Mr. JOHN VENGEHAM, late of Liss, in the county of Hants, Yeoman, deceased, are requested to deliver an account thereof to Mr. C. J. Hector, Attorney, Petersfield, in order that the same may be discharged; and all persons indebted to the aforesaid John Vengeham, will be pleased forthwith to pay the amount of their debts to the aforesaid C. J. Hector.
  Petersfield, Jan. 12, 1810.


7-Feb-1810
Morning Advertiser
COLONEL WARDLE

 SUBSCRIPTION for Indemnifying COLONEL WARDLE against all Losses, Charges, and Expences he may have sustained, or be liable to, in consequence of his Exertions in the Public Behalf, particularly during the last Session of Parliament, and to express the Sense of the Nation on his independent, undaunted, and patriotic Conduct.

Amount ………………….. £2,552 7 6

...
  C.H. Hector, Petersfield  1 1 0

(ensp;Conformable to the Resolutions passed at the General Meeting held at the Crown and Anchor Tavern, Strand, the 18th ult. 2000l. have been paid into the hands of Messrs. Drummonds, Banker.

SAMUEL BROOKS, Treasurer.  

26-Feb-1810
Hampshire Telegraph

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by THOMAS WILNEY, at the Red Lion Inn, in Petersfield, on Friday the 9th day of March next, at three o’clock in the afternoon;—Three Hundred and One OAK TIMBERS TREES, (the greater part of large dimensions) with the Lop, Top, and Bark; now standing and growing on certain Farms and Lands in the parishes of Harting and Rogate, in the county of Sussex.
  Thomas Pinke, of Harting, will shew the Timber; and further particulars may be known on application to Mr. Richard Andrews, of Petersfield.


5-Mar-1810
Hampshire Telegraph
Prime oak and Ash Timber.

 TO be SOLD by AUCTION, on Wednesday, March 14, 1810, at the George Inn, Petersfield, precisely at four o’clock in the afternoon;—
  Lot 1. Forty-three OAK TREES, of good dimensions, standing with their Lop, Top, and Bark, on Whetham Farm, in the parish of Liss, near Petersfield, Hants.
  Lot 2. Seventy-nine ASH TREES, standing as above, with their Lop and Top.
  For a view of the same, apply to Mr. R. Bridger, on the premises; and for particulars, to ?. A. Minchin, Petersfield.

19-Mar-1810
Hampshire Telegraph
Prime Oak Timber.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Mr. WILLMER; at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Monday the 26th day of March, 1810, at four o’clock in the afternoon:— 473 prime OAK TREES, with the Lops, Tops, and Bark, standing on the several Premises under-mentioned:—
  Lot 1. Fifty-two Oak Trees, standing in the Woolchers, and numbered in white paint, from No. 84 to 135, inclusive.
  Lot 2. Forty-eight Oak Trees, standing in Beech Wood, and numbered in white paint, from No. 1 to 48, inclusive.
  Lot 3. Eighty-three Oak Trees, standing in the Hurst, and numbered in paint, from No. 1 to 83 inclusive, in which are two Oaks, one called Hale Oak, and one in the Forest Peat Moor.
  Lot 4. One hundred and forty Oak Trees, standing on Burnt Furzen, in Bere Forest, and hammered P. T.
  Lot 5. One hundred and fifty-three Oak Trees, standing on Red-hill Brow, in said Forest, and hammered P. T.
  Lot 6. One hundred and sixty Oak Trees, standing on the north side of Red-hill Plain, in said Forest, and hammered P. T.
  N.B. Lots 1,2, and 3, are standing on the Manor of Liss, near Petersfield; and Mr. Knight, of Liss, will shew them.—The other Lots are standing in Bere Forest, near Portsmouth, and Stephen Bunn, jun. of Stakes Hill, will shew them.

16-Apr-1810
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER
SATURDAY, APRIL 14.

 Wednesday the remains of John Wilkes, Esq. were interred in St. Laurence church, in this city. Mr. Wilkes died at Milland House, near Petersfield. He was formerly an eminent printer and bookseller in this city.

25-Apr-1810
Aberdeen Press & Journal
INQUIRY
INTO
THE SCHELDT EXPEDITION.

MAJORITY AND MINORITY
  We insert a List of the Majority who voted against Lord Porchester’s motion for censuring the advisers of the Expedition to the Scheldt, and also a List of those who voted for the censure.
  Those marked thus a are Members for Counties.
MAJORITY.

 Joliffe, H. Petersfield.

28-May-1810
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
Subscription for Mrs. Allen and her Children
  The late Mr. Allen was Deputy Receiver of the Land Tax, for the county of Southampton, twenty-nine years. His liberality, disinterested public spirit, and truly useful activity, are universally acknowledged. Unhappily by his death, his Widow and numerous family are fallen from a comfortable and respectable situation in life to a state of extreme distress.
  At the instance of their neighbours and friends, a Subscription has been set on foot for their relief. The Rev. Lloyd Williams, Vicar of Whitchurch; William Bridges, Esq. of Laverstoke; and Mr. William Holding, of Kingsclere, gent. are named Trustees, for the due application of the amount of such subscription.
  Contributions will be thankfully received by the Trustees; and also in their names at the following banking houses …
Further Subscriptions received to May 21st
  …
  Patrick, Eyles, Messrs. and Co. Petersfield  5  0 0

4-Jun-1810
Hampshire Telegraph

  All Persons having any Claim on the Estate or Effects of the late Mr. JAMES MEERES, deceased, of the parish of Steep, near Petersfield, Hants, are hereby requested to deliver in their Accounts to Mr. Edward Mundy, Petersfield, or Mr. John Meeres, of Steep Mill. Trustees to the Effects of the said James Meeres, on or before the first day of August next, in order that the same may be adjusted; and all Persons that stand indebted to the said Effects, are requested to pay the same without further notice.
 Steep, June 1, 1810.

11-Jun-1810
Hampshire Chronicle
CHICHESTER,
SATURDAY, JUNE 9.


  A very unfortunate circumstance has lately happened at Petersfield; a soldier, who had died suddenly, was opened by Messrs. Cave and Wicher, surgeons, of that place, for the purpose of learning the cause that occasioned his death. Unfortunately, in sewing up the body, both of these gentlemen pricked their fingers, and the contagious matter was communicated to both, and Mr. Cave has fallen a victim, having survived but a few days after; of Mr. Wicher, we understand, hopes are given that he will recover.


15-Jun-1810
Kentish Gazette

  DIED.—Monday last, Mr. — Cave, surgeon and apothecary, at Petersfield, Hants, and son of Mr. — Cave, of Fletching, Sussex. His death was occasioned by a puncture he received on his thumb, from the point of a needle, with which he was sewing up a body, he had opened for professional information. The putrid particle thus introduced, was so active on the system, that it carried him off in five days. Mr. Whicher, his partner, who was assisting, received a similar injury, and has in consequence been dangerously ill, but hopes are now entertained of his recovery.


16-Jun-1810
The Ipswich Journal

  On June 4, died Mr. Chas. Cave, surgeon, Petersfield; the circumstances of whose death must excite respect for his memory, much sympathy for his loss, as well as caution to the profession. On the Saturday se’nnight previous to his death, a seafaring man, who had been ill for a few days preceding, was attacked, whilst at Petersfield, with a violent inflammation on the lungs; and after being attended several times during the day by Messrs. Cave and Wicher, he died the next morning. The surgeons, being of various opinions as to the real cause of his death, agreed to open the body; which they did, and found the lungs in a complete state of putrefaction. They afterwards sewed up the body, in doing which they pricked their fingers; and, in the evening, both of them were seized with violent pains in the arms, which soon extended to nearly the whole of the body. Mr. Cave, after enduring the most excruciating pains, died on the following Monday. Mr. Whicher is still alive, though suffering extreme pain; but his hand and arm have been opened by several of the most skilful surgeons of the neighbourhood, and from the metropolis; and a discharge being obtained from the wounds, it is hoped his life will be saved. The death of Mr. Cave is the cause of universal regret, for he was not more respected for his abilities, and general demeanor, than he was for his humanity. He was always forward in attending to the wants of the sick sailors and soldiers who might be passing through the town, in whose service, it may be almost said, his life fell a sacrifice. He was in the 36th year of his age, and has left a young widow, who deeply mourns his loss. It is a remarkable circumstance, that the late Mr. Whicher, (of Petersfield) father of the above mentioned Mr. Whicher, died of a fever, which was brought on by his great zeal to save the lives of some sick soldiers, who, on their return from the disastrous expedition to Spain, about 15 months since, dropt down in the town.

25-Jun-1810
Hampshire Telegraph
Valuable Freehold Tythes in Sussex.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Mr. PEACOCK, on Thursday the fifth day of July, 1810, and at the Dolphin Inn, at Petersfield, Hants, at 12 o’clock at noon:—The IMPROPRIATE RECTORY, or PARSONAGE of ROGATE, with the Rectorial, or Great Tythes, of the principal part of that Parish, extending over upwards of eleven hundred acres of some of the most fertile and productive corn land in the county of Sussex; and a Freehold Close of Land, containing by estimation three quarters of an acre, situate at East Harting, in Sussex, in the occupation of Mr. Joseph Postlethwaite.
  At the same time and place, will be Let by Auction, for a Term of Years, The PARSONAGE FARM, Rectorial Tithe Free: containing by estimation sixty-three acres of land, more or less, in a high state of cultivation, situate in the parish of Rogate, on the borders of Hampshire, four miles from the town of Petersfield, and six from Midhurst, in the centre of a fine sporting country abounding with game, to which is attached, an invaluable Right of Common over the extensive Commons and Waste Lands contiguous to the Estate.—(The Owner intending to reserve to himself the Parsonage House, and about four acres of Land.)—The Estates may be viewed on application, at the Parsonage House.

25-Jun-1810
Hampshire Chronicle
HANTS.
TO BE SOLD BY PRIVATE CONTRACT,
  ALL that Valuable and very Desirable FARM, called, or known by the name of ASHFORD FARM, situate in the parish of Steep, in the County of Hants; consisting of a modern built Farm House, Barn, Stable, and other convenient outbuildings, with about one hundred and thirty-four customary Acres of excellent Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Ground, with extensive Common Rights for sheep and beasts, now in the occupation of Mr. JOHN FIELDER, whose term will expire at Michaelmas, one thousand eight hundred and thirteen.
  Also all that Valuable and Desirable FARM, called, or known by the name of STEEP MARSH FARM, adjoining the above, consisting of a good Farm House, Barn, Stable, and other convenient outbuildings, with about one hundred and nine customary Acres of excellent Arable, Meadow, Pasture, and Hop Ground, with extensive Common Rights for sheep and beasts, now in the occupation of — GODDARD, whose term will expire at Michaelmas, one thousand eight hundred and thirteen.
  The whole of the Premises are in compleat repair; the situations are delightful; the country abounds with game and field sports. Harriers are kept within a mile.
  The whole is Copyhold of Inheritance, under the Bishop of Winchester, held of the Manor of Eastmeon, subject to a small annual quit rent, and fine certain, which makes it nearly equal to freehold. The Farms are distant from Petersfield, two miles; Portsmouth, twenty; and London, fifty-six.
  For further particulars apply to Mr. WILLIAM PADWICK, Solicitor, No. 5, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London, (if by Letter, post paid), where a Plan of the Estate may be seen; or to WILLIAM PADWICK, Esq. Cosham House, Hants. Mr. FIELDER, the tenant, will shew the Farms.

2-Jul-1810
Hampshire Telegraph

  COUNTY FIRE OFFICE, Southampton-street, Strand, London, established for the express benefit of Country Residents, under Parliamentary License. …

AGENTS.
  Petersfield ………………….Mr. Jesse Cave Mitchell

31-Jul-1810
Morning Post

  In addition to Dogget’s Coat and Badge which is always rowed for on to-morrow, there are two pecuniary prizes left by Sir WILLIAM JOLLIFFE, of Petersfield, to be annually given to the successful competitors.


1-Aug-1810
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

  A few nights since, about twelve o’clock, a corps of Irish soldiers, quartered at Petersfield, behaved in a most unruly manner: not contented with breaking each other’s heads, they disagreeably annoyed the inhabitants for some time; till, at length, the fear of them was so great, that Capt. Meers called out the Volunteers, who soon assembled in sufficient strength to rout the gentlemen to their quarters, where the ringleaders were put into close confinement:

2-Aug-1810
Morning Post

  In addition to Dogget’s Coat and Badge which is always rowed for on the 1st August, there are two pecuniary prizes left by Sir WILLIAM JOLLIFFE, of Petersfield, to be annually given to the successful competitors.


15-Aug-1810
Morning Post
FASHIONABLE DEPARTURES.
  Hon. Mrs. Paget, for Fair Oak Lodge, near Petersfield, in Hampshire.

27-Aug-1810
Hampshire Telegraph
HANTS.
Valuable Freehold and Copyhold Estates.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Mr. WELLER, on Thursday the twenty-seventh September, 1810, at 12 o’clock, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield; in the following Lots;—
  Lot 1. An eligible COPYHOLD ESTATE, called STEEP-MARSH FARM, situate in the Parish of Steep, consisting of a Farm House, Garden, Barn, Stables, and other out-buildings: together with one hundred and nine acres of good Arable, Meadow, Hop and Coppice Land, with extensive Common Rights on Strode, Steep, and Ashford Commons—timber free, and a small certain fine, which nearly renders the Estate of equal value with Freehold.—Let on Lease to Mr. Goddard, three years of whose term will be unexpired at Michaelmas next.
  Lot 2. A very desirable COPYHOLD ESTATE, called ASHFORD FARM, in the Parish of Steep, consisting of a good Farm House, Garden, excellent Barn, Stables, and other out-buildings, together with one hundred and thirty-four acres of capital Arable, Meadow, Pasture and Coppice Land, in the highest state of cultivation, with extensive Rights over Strode, Steep, and Ashford Commons, in the occupation of Mr. John Fielder, on Lease for an unexpired term of three years at Michaelmas next, nearly equal to Freehold, a small certain fine, and quit rent of 6d.
  Lot 3.  A truly valuable FREEHOLD ESTATE, called BUCKMOOR FARM, in the Parish of Buriton, comprising a Farm House, Garden, Barn, and out-buildings, with a double Cottage, together with about one hundred and five acres of Arable, Meadow, and Pasture Land, let to Mr. Henry Binstead, on Lease for an unexpired term of five years from Michaelmas next: with a good sheep walk on Weston Down, and Right for horses and beasts on Strode Common.
  Lot 4. A very valuable and truly desirable COPYHOLD ESTATE, called DUNHILL FARM, in the Parish of Steep, consisting of a handsome House with gardens, pleasure grounds, excellent barns, stable, ox-ranges, and out-building, together with one hundred and thirty-six acres of good Arable and Meadow Land, now in the occupation of Mr. Henry Binstead, on Lease, 5 years of which term are unexpired at Michaelmas next—with Rights on Strode and Ashford Hill—subject to a small certain fine and a quit rent of 19s. 1½d.—and one bushel and a half of wheat, a tenure nearly equal to Freehold. The Estates lie almost within a ring fence, Lot 1 and 2 within two miles, and Lot 3 and 4 within one mile of the town of Petersfield.—All the timbers, firs, and tillers, to be valued down to 6d.
  Printed particulars will be delivered 20 days previous to the Sale, and may be had at the Auction Mart; Mr. Harry Phillips, New Bond-street; Messrs. Winstanley, Paternoster-row; of William Padwick, E-q. No. 5, New Square, Lincoln’s Inn, London; at the neighbouring Market Towns, and of Mr. Weller, Chichester.

17-Sep-1810
Hampshire Chronicle
COUNTY FIRE OFFICE.
Agents.
  Petersfield - - - W. Y. Nutt
17-Sep-1810
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.
  A LIST of GAME CERTIFICATES issued in the County aforesaid, to the 8th of September, 1810.
  (All in Petersfield)
  Andrews, Rd. esq.
  Bonham, T. esq.
  Cannon, James
  Eyles, Joseph
  Greetham, Charles
  Humphries, Samuel
  King, Fielder, esq.
  Leer, George
  Meers, John
  Whicher, rev. John

24-Sep-1810
Hampshire Telegraph
Spanish Sheep at Petersfield.
  TO be SOLD by PUBLIC AUCTION, in Petersfield Market, on Wednesday, the twenty-sixth day of September,—About Forty SPANISH RAMS, of the Negrette Breed; and Eighty SPANISH EWES, of the true Paular Breed, just landed, and now on view.—Apply at the Sun Inn, Petersfield.
24-Sep-1810
Hampshire Chronicle
SPANISH SHEEP PETERSFIELD, HANTS
TO be SOLD by PUBLIC AUCTION,
In Petersfield Market, on Wednesday, the twenty-sixth day of September,
  About EIGHTY Ewes, of the true PAULAR Breed, and about Forty RAMS, of the NEGRETTE Breed, all from the best Marino Flocks of Spain. They are just landed, and may be viewed on application at the Sun Inn, Petersfield.
  Certificate of the Breed will be produced at the Sale, and Catalogues timely delivered.

26-Nov-1810
Morning Advertiser

  PUBLIC OFFICE, Bow-street, Nov. 22, 1810.
  Stolen lately, from Upmarden, near Petersfield, Hants, a Brown Mare, aged, about 14 hands and a half high, lately blistered on all her legs, the two hind legs white. Also a Black GELDING about 13 hands high, six years old, black legs and no particular mark; and a Grey PONEY, rising six years old, about 13 hands high, strong made, and large head. Whoever will give information to Mr. Perrin, of Upmarden aforesaid, as shall be the means of discovering and apprehending the offender or offenders, shall, on conviction, receive a reward of TEN GUINEAS.

26-Nov-1810
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 24.
  The following prisoners have been this week committed to our county gaol:—
  … George Beazley, for privately stealing wearing apparel in a house at Petersfield.

1811

10-Jan-1811
Hampshire Telegraph

 On Wednesday a detachment of 160 Horse Artillery embarked from the Dock-yard, Portsmouth, on board the following transports: Hanby, Success, John, Christopher, Union, British Nestor, &c. The Hamadryad takes charge of them as far as the mouth of the Tagus, and was expected to sail on Monday. Another detachment of Horse Artillery is waiting at Petersfield, and at the Portsmouth barracks, to embark as soon as the weather will permit; 100 of the Royal Waggon Train are also waiting at Portsmouth for transports. They have a great number of waggons with them.

14-Jan-1811
Hampshire Chronicle
EDUCATION.
  AT Mr. BAYNTON’S ACADEMY, Froxfield, near Petersfield, Hants, Young Gentlemen are genteelly Boarded and Educated, on the following Terms:

 N.B. As Mr. B’s number is limited, and he prefers little boys, (in general those from 6 to 10 years old,) he solicits the attention of Parents and Guardians who may have such children to put to school, and assures them the strictest regard will be paid to their health, comfort, and improvement.
  The School will open on the 21st of January, 1811.

The situation is remarkably healthy.


4-Mar-1811
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER
  The Lent Assizes for this county will commence on Monday, at the Castle, of this city, before the Hon. Sir Alan Chambre, and the Hon. Sir John Bayley, Knts. The calendar contains the following list of prisoners for trial:
  George Beazley, for stealing from the dwelling-house of George Berry, of Woolbedding, Sussex, two great coats; and from the dwelling-house of William Southen, of Petersfield, one great coat.
11-Mar-1811
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER
SATURDAY, MARCH 9.
  George Beagley, aged 26, was indicted on a charge of stealing two great coats from the house of George Berry, of Woolbedding, Sussex. He keeps a little public-house. On the 28th of November last the prisoner came to sleep there; not having a bed to spare, Berry lent the prisoner two great coats to wrap himself up, and locked him into the room; in the morning, however, he discovered that the prisoner had gone away with the coats. He was apprehended at Petersfield, and had one coat on, and the other on his arm. He was ordered to be imprisoned to hard labour for one year, and fined 1s.

25-May-1811
Globe

 The 12th dragoons received on Tuesday an order at Petersfield, to halt there until farther orders, the transports not being yet ready at Portsmouth for their reception. One hundred of the guards, wounded at Barrosa, arrived on the same day at Petersfield, in waggons.

28-May-1811
Kentish Weekly or Canterbury Journal
BANKRUPTS
  Thomas Brown, Steep, Southampton, fellmonger, June 11, 12, July 2, Royal Oak, Portsea, Southampton. Attornies Mr. Cannon, Petersfield; and Messrs. Rhodes, Cook, and Handley, St. James’s-walk, Clerkenwell, London.

24-Jun-1811
Hampshire Telegraph

 COUNTY FIRE OFFICE, Southampton, Strand, London, established for the express benefit of Country Residents, under Parliamentary License.

AGENTS
Petersfield ………………… Jervis Care Mitchell


8-Jul-1811
Hampshire Telegraph

  TO be LET, and entered on immediately.—A capital MANSION-HOUSE, with suitable Offices and Conveniences for the reception of a large family, pleasantly situated within half a mile of Petersfield, commanding a beautiful view over the adjacent country.
  The House is situated on a dry soil, and remarkably healthy; has a lawn in front, a newly-planted shrubbery, and an extensive walled-in garden, well planted with fruit-trees: distance from London 54 miles, and Portsmouth 18. Several coaches pass through Petersfield to and from London, daily.
  The Premises may be let on lease for three, six, or nine years, as may be agreed upon.
  The House may be seen, and further particulars known, on application to Mr. Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield, Hants.

15-Jul-1811
Hampshire Telegraph
Portsmouth and Petersfield Turnpike Road.
  NOTICE is hereby given, that the TOLLS arising at the several Toll-gates and Weighing-engine upon this Turnpike-road, will be LET by AUCTION, to the best Bidder, at the Ship and Bell Inn, Horndean, on Monday the fifth day of August next, between the hours of eleven o’clock in the forenoon and one o’clock in the afternoon, for ONE YEAR, to commence from the date agreed upon at the Auction, in the manner directed by the Act passed in the Thirteenth Year of the Reign of his Majesty King George the Third, for Regulating the Turnpike-roads; which Tolls produced the last year, at the respective Gates, the several yearly Sums following, viz.—

  Above the expences of collecting them; and will be put up at such Sums. Whoever happens to be the best Bidder, must, at the same time, pay down Two Months Rent in advance; and give Security, and produce sufficient Sureties, to the satisfaction of the Trustees of the said Turnpike-road, for payment of the Rent agreed for, and at such times as they shall direct.

By Order of the Trustees,
C. J. HECTOR and D. LOWE, Clerks,
  ☞ A copy of the Security required may be seen at the Offices of the Clerks at Petersfield and Portsea.


22-Jul-1811
Hampshire Telegraph

  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by WILLMER and SON, on Tuesday the 30th of July, 1811, on Eastmeon Stroud near Petersfield,—A Valuable SOUTH-DOWN FLOCK, amounting to near 600 true-bred Rams and Ewes, Ram-Lams, Ewes and Wether-Lams, reared with great attention for the last ten years, by crosses selected from the stock of Messrs. Lipscomb, Pinnix, Stone, Reed, and other the most celebrated Flocks in the counties of Sussex and Hampshire, the property of Mr. William Bailey, at Bordean Farm, near Petersfield.
  The Sale to begin precisely at two o’clock.
  ☞ Particulars will be early distributed at the principal Inns of the adjacent towns; at Mr. Bailey’s, at Bordean; and may be had of Willmer and Son, Petersfield.


9-Aug-1811
Kentish Gazette

  MARRIED.—Tuesday se’nnight, at Herstmonceux church by the Rev. Mr. Evans, Mr. George Woolley, surgeon, of Petersfield, Hants, to Miss Gell, of Herstmonceux.


23-Sep-1811
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE GAME DUTY.
  A LIST of GENERAL GAME CERTIFICATES, issued in the County aforesaid, from the 1st Aug. to the 9th of Spt. 1811, inclusive, pursuant to the Acts of Parliament granting a duty of 3l. 3s. on each Certificate.
  (All in Petersfield)
  Andrews, R. esq
  Bonham, T. esq
  Blunt, William
  Budd, Monlas
  Clement, Henry
  Cannon, James
  Eyles, Joseph
  Greetham, Charles
  King, Fielder, esq
  Leer, George, jun
  Whicher, rev John
25-Sep-1811
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

  On Monday se’nnight, Mr. Bridger was shooting near Petersfield, when his gun accidently went off whilst loading it, and so shattered his hand as to make amputation necessary.


18-Oct-1811
Kentish Gazette
Dividends in the Country
  Nov. 5. John Rice Kemp, Haslemere, Surrey, victualler, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, Southampton.
  Nov. 5. Robert Uren, Petersfield, Southampton, fell-monger, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield.
28-Oct-1811
Hampshire Chronicle
TO BOOT AND SHOEMAKERS.
TO BE DISPOSED OF,
  THAT well-known accustomed SHOP and BUSINESS of Mr. JOHN POWELL, of Petersfield, Boot and Shoemaker to his Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge, retiring from Business.—The trade is among the first noblemen and gentlemen in the kingdom, and to a great extent round the country.
  The business may be entered on immediately, and the house and premises either bought or rented.
  For further particulars apply as above.

4-Nov-1811
Hampshire Telegraph

  THE FIRST SUBSCRIPTION ASSEMBLY will be held at the Dolphin Inn Petersfield, on Friday the 8th of November.
  Subscriber’s Ticket, £1. 1s.; Non-Subscriber’s, 5s. each
  ☞ No Person admitted unless introduced by a Subscriber

21-Nov-1811
Bath Chronicle & Weekly Gazette

  MARRIED.—Wm. P. Veal, esq; of Petersfield, to Harriet, youngest daughter of Mrs. Hopwood, of Emsworth.


20-Dec-1811
Kentish Weekly Post & Canterbury Journal
THE LATE MURDERS.
POLICE-OFFICE SHADWELL.
  Monday afternoon, a man named Thomas Knight was brought, in a post-chaise, to this office, from Godalming, in Surrey, where he had been detained by Lord Middleton, on suspicion of being concerned in the murder of Mr. Marr, and family, and underwent an examination before the Magistrates.
  The circumstances of suspicion alleged against the prisoner were, that on Saturday-se’nnight he came home in the evening, to his lodgings, apparently very much dejected; ---that he took off his smock-frock, and began to wash and dry it before the fire;--- that it had upon it stains a good deal resembling blood, but the witnesses did not state that positively:—and that on the morning following, he left his lodgings early, and did not tell his landlady where he was going. The account which the prisoner gave of himself, was, that he was a Portsmouth man bred and born. He came to London about six weeks since, and remained in the service of Messrs. Sims and Co. rope-makers, as a hackler, until Saturday se’nnight. His wife having been ill for a considerable time, he determined to go down to Portsmouth, where she then was with her father, and bring her up to town. On the evening of Saturday se’nnight he went to the King’s Arms public-house, kept by a Mr. Edwards, to get paid his weekly wages, which amounted to 12s. He remained at Mr. Edwards’s until about eleven o’clock, drinking with some of his fellow workmen; he went home to his lodgings, and soon after went to bed. He was not dejected; on the contrary, he was rather merry in consequence of the liquor he had drank, and laughed with his landlady, who bantered him for keeping such late hours at night during the absence of his wife. Next morning he arose about half-after seven o’clock, and went to Mr. Dodd the overseer of Mr. Sims’s works, and told him that he was going down to Portsmouth to bring up his wife; and requested he would take care of his tools until his return. He then went to the Kin’s Arms public-house, in hopes of getting 1s. 6d. which Mr. Edwards owed him, and he remained there a short time with some of his workmates. He then left the public-house, and walked about Shadwell for about an hour, when he met two men named Quin, father and son; and he went with them to a wine-vault and had some gin. He remained with them until ten o’clock on Sunday morning, when he started for Portsmouth. He arrived at Portsmouth on Monday evening, and rode only 12 miles of the journey. He remained with his wife and child at Gosport until Thursday morning last, when they all set off together for London. On Thursday night he arrived at Petersfield, where he slept with his wife and child. The next day, when he was walking through Godalming, he was apprehended by two officers, on a charge of which he protested to God he was as innocent as an unborn child. He said, the reason why he did not tell his landlady of his intention to go to Portsmouth, was, because he owed her 3s.; and having only 12s. in the world, he was afraid she would insist on being paid, if he told her he was going to leave the lodgings, with which, had he complied, he would have been unable to bring home his wife.
  The prisoner underwent a very minute and rigid examination, but he was consistent in all his answers, and adhered to his first statement. His accounts precisely corresponding with the evidence given, upon which the warrant for his apprehension was founded, except the statement of his landlady, relative to his dejection, and taking off his smock-frock to wash, the Magistrates expressed their belief, that this man had no connection with this melancholy affair; but remanded him for farther examination, in order to be confronted with the witness examined on behalf of the charge.

1812

2-Mar-1812
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE LENT ASSIZES.
  The number of prisoners on the calendar were 43, of these the following twenty were capitally convicted, and received sentence of death:—
  William Wilson, aged 30, for stealing a horse, bridle, and saddle, the property of Richard Matthews, at Boarhunt. The prosecutor, who has a son living at that place, went thither on the first of July. He turned his horse into the yard; the next morning he missed it, and did not see it again till October, when he found it in possession of Mr. Greentree, who, it appeared, had it from the prisoner, in exchange for another horse, on the 2d of July. The prisoner was apprehended at a public-house about half a mile out of Petersfield. In his defence he said that he had received the horse to sell for one Rainbow.
21-Mar-1812
Northampton Mercury
BANKRUPTS required to SURRENDER.
  Richard Tribe, of Hambledon, Southampton, common-brewer, April 17, 18, and 28, at the George Inn, Hambledon.—Attorney, Mr. Hector, Petersfield.

23-Mar-1812
Hampshire Chronicle
COUNTY FIRE OFFICE.
Agents
  Petersfield - - - - John Pince

20-Apr-1812
Sussex Advertiser
BANKRUPTS.
  Charlotte Veal, and William Peachy Veal, Petersfield, Southampton, brewers.
21-Apr-1812
Sussex Advertiser
BANKRUPTS.
  Charlotte and W. P. Veal, Petersfield, Southampton, brewers, April 29, 30 May 30, at the Red Lion Inn, Petersfield. Att. Mr. Wilshen, Salisbury-street, Strand.

27-Apr-1812
Hampshire Telegraph

  WHEREAS a Commission of Bankruptcy is awaited and issued forth against CHARLOTTE VEAL and WILLIAM PEACHEY VEAL, of Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, Brewers and Copartners, and they being declared Bankrupts, are hereby required to surrender themselves, to the said Commissioners, in the said Commission named, or the major part of them, on the 29th day of April next, at one o’clock in the afternoon; on the 30th day of the same month, at eleven of the clock in the forenoon; and on the 30th day of May next, at eleven of the clock in the forenoon at the Red Lion Inn, Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, and make a full discovery and disclosure of their Estate and Effects; when and where the Creditors are to come prepared to prove their Debts; and at the second Meeting to choose Assignees; and at the last sitting the said Bankrupts are required to finish their examinations, and the Creditors are to assent to, or dissent from, the allowance of their Certificate. All persons indebted to the said Bankrupts, or that have any of their Effects, are not to pay or deliver the same but to whom the Commissioners shall appoint, but to give notice to Cornthwaite John Hector, of Petersfield, Solicitor to the said Commission; or to John Willshen of Salisbury-street, Strand, London.

S. TWYFORD,
RICHARD ANDREWS,
CHARLES GREETHAM.

Dated April 18, 1812.


1-Jun-1812
Hampshire Telegraph
DOLPHIN INN, PETERSFIELD.
  MR. PATRICK most respectfully informs the public, that he has declined the DOLPHIN INN in favour of Mr. HENRY HOLDAWAY, late of the George Inn, Petersfield; and Mr. Patrick takes this opportunity to return his grateful Thanks to his Friends in particular, and the Public in general, for the Patronage and Support he has received from them; and he requests the favour of their continuance to his Successor. Mr. Patrick will enter on the BUSH INN, at Farnham, in a few days; and he begs to request the Support of his Friends and the Public (who have hitherto given him the preference), which he will endeavour to merit by a strict attention to their comfort and convenience. It has ever been the first object of Mr. Patrick’s regards to accommodate Commercial Travellers, and it will be his study to give them a pleasant reception at the Bush Tavern, and prove to them that “Good Wine needs no Bush.”


 MR. HOLDAWAY most respectfully informs the Public, that he has entered on the DOLPHIN INN, at Petersfield (for many years conducted with the highest reputation by Mr. PATRICK), and he hopes to merit, by his assiduity, the like Preference which has been given to his Predecessor: among the first objects of his attention, will be a swell-stored Larder, the choicest Wines, able Post Horses, and careful Drivers; with the most unremitted attention to every department of his Business.
Dolphin Inn, 16th May, 1812.

22-Jun-1812
Hampshire Telegraph

   TO be SOLD or LET,—A very capacious HOUSE, recently modernised, replete with neatness, comfort, and convenience: an excellent Garden, Stable, and a small Meadow; situate in the High-street, Petersfield, in the occupation of the proprietor, John Cross, Esq. who will give immediate possession.

  Further particulars may be known by applying to Mr. Weller, Chichester.



HANTS.

  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, on the Premises, by Mr. WELLER, on Monday the 22d of June, and following days,—The Genuine and truly Fashionable HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE, choice Wines, and other Effects, the property of John Cross, Esq. quitting his residence at Petersfield. The Furniture comprises very elegant four-post bedsteads, with very rich printed calico, dimity, and other furnitures; the appendages of the bed of the first-quality; beautiful rosewood and mahogany wardrobes, chest of drawers, dressing table; a drawing room en suite, a Grecian sofa, 12 chairs of japanned rosewood and burnished gold, rosewood sofa and card tables, a large rich French window curtain, with tasty draperies; piano forte, with additional keys by Broadwood; a large
palmaletta sideboard, 12 mahogany eating room chairs of Grecian shape, highly finished and covered with red morocco; a pair of magnificent pier glasses in two plates, in neat carved frames, in white and burnished gold, the extent of which is nine feet five inches; large concave mirrors, mahogany library bookends, dumb waiters, hall chairs, a time-piece, paintings and prints, china, glass, &c. 25 dozen of choice old Madeira, 40 dozen of old crusted Port, 35 dozen of Bucellas, a hogsbend of prime old Port, of the favourite vintage, with usual dairy and washing utensils.

  The effects may be viewed on Saturday preceding the sale. Catalogues, at 6d. each, may be had at the King’s Arms, Godalming; Anchor, Liphook; Dolphin, Petersfield; Ship & Bell, Horndean; Mottley & Co.’s, Printers, Portsmouth; Bear Inn, Havant; at the Libraries, Brighton, Worthing, and Bognor; and of Mr. Weller, Chichester.

22-Jun-1812
Hampshire Telegraph
To Brewers, Maltsters, and Others.
PETERSFIELD,—HANTS.
  TO BE SOLD BY private contract,—All that compact MESSUAGE or DWELLING-HOUSE, with the Garden, Malt-house, Brew-house, Stables, and convenient Offices, thereunto belonging, in complete repair; situate in the Spain in Petersfield, and late in the occupation of Messrs. Veal.
  N.B. The above eligible and extensive Premises are held for a term of 1000 years, at the small quit-rent of one penny, whereof 930 years are unexpired; and are particularly well-adapted for the Brewing and Malting Business, the country near supplying barley of the first quality.
  For further particulars, and a sight of the Premises, apply to Mr. Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield.

13-Jul-1812
Globe

  The nine men of the 3d Dragoon Guards, who were refractory at Petersfield, when on their way to embark under the orders of Capt. Cross, were sentenced to receive 200 lashes: seven have had their punishment, the sentence of one has been commuted to serve abroad for life, and one received only 100 lashes, in consequence of sickness.

13-Jul-1812
Hampshire Chronicle
EDUCATION.
  AT Mr. BAYNTON’S ACADEMY, Froxfield, near Petersfield, Hants, a limited number of young Gentlemen (mostly from 5 to 10 years of age) are genteelly Boarded and Educated, on the following Terms:

  N.B. As Mr. B’s number is limited, and he prefers little boys, (in general those from 6 to 10 years old,) he solicits the attention of Parents and Guardians who may have such children to put to school, and assures them the strictest regard will be paid to their health, comfort, and improvement.

The School re-opens July 27th, 1812.
The situation is extremely healthy.


13-Jul-1812
Hampshire Telegraph

  MRS. WHEATLY, with grateful acknowledgements for those favours which she has received at Petersfield, respectfully informs her Friends and the Public she is REMOVED to Farnham, where (assisted by her Daughter) she intends continuing her PREPARATORY SCHOOL for Children under Twelve Years of Age; and hopes, by unremitting attention to the Health and Improvement of those who may be entrusted to her care, to merit a continuance of their patronage and support.
  N.B. School re-commences on the 27th instant.


3-Aug-1812
Hampshire Telegraph

  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by T. WILLMER, on Wednesday the 9th day of September, 1812, at the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, precisely at four o’clock in the afternoon:—A recently built Brick and Stone SMOCK WINDMILL, with Two Pair of French Stones, and all Implements and Machinery thereto belonging; with a Stable and Piggery, and about 18 Acres (more or less) of good Arable Land adjoining advantageously situated for Gristing, at a short distance from the turnpike road, on the Barnet, in the Parish of Froxfield, near Petersfield, Hants, in the occupation of Mr. James Parker, who will shew the same. The foregoing Premises are Copyhold of Inheritance, held under the Bishop of Winchester, subject to a very small fine, and are nearly equal to Freehold.
  Further particulars may be known by applying to Messrs. Johnson, Price, and Freeland, Solicitors, in Chichester; or Mr. Greetham, Solicitor, Petersfield.

10-Aug-1812
Hampshire Telegraph
WATER CORN MILL,—HANTS.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by JOHN CAWLEY, on Monday, Sept. 7, 1812, at the Geirge Inn, in Petersfield, between the hours of four and six in the afternoon:—All that capital WATER CORN MILL, called FROGMORE MILL, situate in the parish of Eastmeon, Hants, capable of working two pair of stones; together with a good Dwelling-House, out-houses, stable, and other convenient out-buildings, and about two statute acres of good water meadow land thereunto adjoining, as the same are now in the occupation of Mr. James Rolfe, whose term therein will expire at Michaelmas next.
  The above Mill and Premises are Copyhold of Inheritance, under the Bishop of Winchester, at a small quit-rent, and are distant only four miles from the market town of Petersfield, in good corn country.
  For a view of the Premises, apply to the tenant; and for further particulars to Mr. Samuel Padwick, of Eastmeon; or C. J. Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield.

24-Aug-1812
Salisbury & Winchester Journal

  On Tuesday last was married, at Southampton, Mr. Collingwood, printer to the University of Oxford, to Miss Baker, late of Ashford, near Petersfield, Hants.


16-Oct-1812
Morning Chronicle
NEW PARLIAMENT
MEMBERS RETURNED

 Petersfield.—Hylton Joliffe, James Cannon, Esqrs.

19-Oct-1812
Morning Chronicle
HANTS.
SALE BY AUCTION,
By Mr. FOREMAN,
  On Wednesday, 21st October, 1812, and following day, the property of Charles Coles, esq. who has let his farms.
  OLD DITCHAM FARM, near Petersfield. Excellent flock of 800 sheep, chief Southdowns, horses, colts, cows, heifers, swine, implements in husbandry, &c.
  The stock consists of 310 breeding ewes, 178 wethers, 3 rams, 17 ram lambs, 284 ewe and wether lambs, 15 fat sheep, 17 cart horse and mares (colour chiefly black), 2 two year old fillies, a year old colt, a cart foal, a five year old poney, 15 cows and heifers, 25 head of swine, 5 waggons, 8 carts, 8 ploughs, 14 harrows and drags, 50 dozen new hurdles, about 15 loads of wheeler’s timbe, converted, together with harness for 20 horses, patent chaff cutter, malt mill, &c. &c,
  Catalogues may be had four days previous to the sale, at the Dolphin, Petersfield; and at the principal Inns at Alton, Basingstoke, Odiham, Farnham, Kingstone, Cobham, Guildford, Godalming, East Grinstead, Haslemere, Midhurst, Petworth, Horsham, Steyning, Arundel, Dorking, Chichester, Havant, Fareham, Wickham, Bishop Waltham, Cosham, Horn Dean, Gosport; at the Place of Sale; and of the Auctioneer, Brixton Hill, Surrey.
  N.B. The stock may be viewed four days before the sale, on application to Mr. Hatch, the Bailiff, at Ditcham Grove, near Chalton, who will shew the same.

16-Oct-1812
Hampshire Chronicle

  LIST of Persons who have obtained General Certificates at the Rate of Three Guineas each, for the Year 1812.
    (All from Petersfield)
  Andrews, Richard, esq
  Bonham, Thomas, esq
  Clement, Henry
  Eyles, Joseph
  Greetham, Charles
  Humphries, Samuel
  King, Fielder, esq
  Leer, George
  Whicher, rev J.


5-Nov-1812
Cheltenham Chronicle
LONDON, MONDAY, NOV. 2.
  Mr. Canning and Mr. Creevey, the Candidates at Liverpool, had each two strings to their bow—the former elected for Petersfield as well as Liverpool. Mr. Creevey unsuccessful at Liverpool, returned for Thetford, in Norfolk.
7-Nov-1812
Lancaster Gazette
NEW PARLIAMENT
HOUSE OF COMMONS
LIST OF THE MEMBERS RETURNED
  To serve in the New Parliament for the several Counties, Cities, Boroughs, &c. in England and Wales, alphabetically arranged.
* Those printed in Italics, were not in the last Parliament. Those marked thus (*) are new for the respective places. All the rest are re-elected. Those marked thus (¶) are returned for more than one place.

 Petersfield—H. Joliffe, G. Canning,


8-Dec-1812
Manchester Mercury
Days appointed for making orders of Dividends.
DECEMBER.
  28 Richard Tribe, late of Hambledon, in the county of Southampton, common-brewer, dealer and chapman, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield.
19-Dec-1812
Caledonian Mercury

  A new writ was ordered for Petersfield, on the motion of Mr. CANNING, who had been also returned for Liverpool and Sligo, and does not make his election for Petersfield.


19-Dec-1812
The Suffolk Chronicle or Weekly General Advertiser & County Express

  On Tuesday, in the House of Commons, Mr. Canning having been returned for Liverpool, Sligo, and Petersfield, observed that he was not prepared to make his election between Liverpool and Sligo, but he did not mean to sit for Petersfield. A new writ was therefore ordered for that borough.

24-Dec-1812
Liverpool Mercury
HOUSE OF COMMONS, Dec. 15.
  A new writ was issued for the borough of Petersfield: Mr. Canning was returned for Petersfield, Liverpool, and Sligo, and had rejected Petersfield; but as there is a petition pending against his return for Liverpool, he has not made his choice between that town and Sligo.

26-Dec-1812
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser
The return of Mr. Canning for Liverpool, Sligo, and Petersfield, occasioned a wag to observe, that the Right Hon. Gentleman had improved on the principle of his ci-devant colleague, Lord Castlereagh—his Lordship was content with two strings to his bow; but Mr. Canning, being classically informed— Numero Deus impare gaudet — considered three as more desirable.

1813

8-Feb-1813
Hampshire Chronicle
PETERSFIELD, HANTS
TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION
  At the Baker’s Arms, in Petersfield, on Thursday the 25th of February instant, at Four o’clock in the Afternoon, the following desirable Freehold Premises, in two Lots:
  Lot 1. ALL that good-accustomed FREEHOLD PUBLIC-HOUSE, called the Baker’s Arms, with requisite Offices, good Soldiers Rooms detached, and Yard adjoining, situated in the Market Town of Petersfield, and now in the occupation of Mr. W. HOAR. This House has an excellent retail beer trade, and from its desirable situation in the centre of the Market-place commands a great proportion of the market custom.
  Lot 2. All those Four FREEHOL Brick Built TENEMENTS, adjoining to each other, situated in the parish of SHEET, with the Outhouses, Gardens, and Appurtenances belonging, and now in the occupation of ROBERT HUDD and others.
  Possession of both lots may be had on completion of the purchases.
  Mr. Minchin, at Petersfield, will shew the premises; and further particulars may be known on application to Messrs. Kerby and Dunn, Solicitors, New Alresford, Hants.

23-Aug-1813
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER
SATURDAY, AUGUST 21.
  A very daring robbery was committed on Sunday evening at a short distance from this city.—Mr. Bradley, a farmer of Bullington, returning home from hence on foot, between seven and eight in the evening, about four miles on the Whitchurch road was overtaken by a soldier, with whom he walked a short distance, but suspecting the soldier’s intention from an endeavour to keep close behind, Mr. Bradley was induced to break out of the road, that the soldier might pass him: at this moment the soldier, with a bludgeon, struck him a violent blow on the head, by which he was knocked down, and lay for some time in a state of insensibility. Then, stripping him of his clothes, which he nearly effected before Mr. Bradley recovered from the blow, he threatened to take his life if he made the smallest resistance, holding a large clasp knife in his hand. He then put on Mr. Bradley’s clothes, leaving his own, consisting of a jacket, trowsers, and cap, with his name, John O’Brien, and the number of his regiment (87th) marked in it. Mr. B. though much exhausted from loss of blood, recovered sufficiently to proceed on his journey. Proper means were immediately taken by the Magistrates here for the discovery of the man, and he was apprehended at a public-house, at Ludgershall, Wilts, on Monday night, and brought here and examined, when, on the clearest proof, he was committed to the county gaol for trial. Mr. B. could not, we understand, positively swear to his person, but the prisoner acknowledged his guilt. He had deserted, with four others, from the 87th regiment of foot, lying in Horsham barracks. His associates were taken between Horsham and Petersfield.

6-Sep-1813
Hampshire Telegraph
CRICKET
  A Grand Match of CRICKET will be played on Wind-mill Down, on Thursday, the 9th inst, for a Subscription Purse, given by the Members of the Hambledon Club, by two Elevens to be selected from the Parishes of Petersfield, Buriton, Steep, Froxfield, Emsworth, Westmeon, Portsmouth, and Hambledon.
  N.B. A good Ordinary on the Down, by Stewart, as usual. Wickets to be pitched exactly at ten o’clock.

18-Oct-1813
Hampshire Telegraph
Liss Mill, and Wildgreen Farm.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Messrs. PEACOCK and SONS, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, Hants, on Wednesday the 3d day of November, 1813, at three o’clock in the afternoon,—All that FREEHOLD MESSUAGE, CORN MILL, and COTTAGE, in good substantial repair; together with the Barn, Stable, and other Out-buildings thereto belonging, and Fifty-two Acres and Five Perches of Land, about 23 Acres of which are excellent Water-meadow, situate, lying, and being in Liss, in the county of Hants, about 20 miles from Portsmouth, three from Petersfield, and nine from Alton, all good market towns; and now in the occupation of Mr. Benjamin Bridger, under a Lease with beneficial covenants, granted for a term, of which six years are unexpired from Michaelmas, 1813.
  The direct turnpike road from London to Portsmouth, leads through part of the parish of Liss.—The Corn Mill is nearly new, and capable of grinding, even in times of long drought, from 15 to 20 loads of wheat per week; and the Land being well supplied with fine water, affords every convenience for erecting paper or other mills.
  Further particulars and Conditions of Sale may be had at the principal Inns at Petersfield, Chichester, Midhurst, and Petworth; at the George Inn, Portsmouth; of George Palmer, Esq. 6, Doughty-street, London; Mr. Mellersh, Solicitor, and of the Auctioneers, Godalming.

22-Nov-1813
Hampshire Telegraph
STEEP,—HANTS.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Mr. JOHN CAWLET, on Tuesday the 23d day of November, 1813, at the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, between the hours of two and four in the afternoon,—All that MESSUAGE, TENEMENT, or DWELLING-HOUSE, now used as two Tenements, with the Out-houses, large Garden, Backside, and Premises thereunto belonging, situate in the Parish of Steep, near the Tan-yard, and now in the several Tenures of Charles Newland, and John Faithful, Tenants at will.—The above Premises are Copyhold of Inheritance, under the Bishop of Winchester, at a small quit rent.
  For a view of the Premises apply to the tenants; and for further particulars to Messrs. Hector and Mitchell, Solicitors, Petersfield.
22-Nov-1813
Hampshire Telegraph
To Brewers, Maltsters, and Others.
  TO be peremptorily SOLD BY AUCTION, (before the Commissioners named in a Commission of Bankrupt, awarded and issued against Charlotte Veal & Co. late of Petersfield, in the county of Hants, Brewers and Co-partners, at the Red Lion Inn, in Petersfield aforesaid), on Friday the 10th day of December next, between the hours of four and six in the afternoon;—All that compact MESSUAGE or DWELLING-HOUSE, with the Garden, Malt-house, Brew-house, Stables, and convenient Offices, thereunto belonging, in complete repair, situate in the Spain, in Petersfield aforesaid, and late in the occupation of the said Messrs. Veal.
  N.B. The above eligible and extensive Premises are held for a term of one thousand years, at the small quit-rent of one penny, whereof 930 years are unexpired, and are particularly well adapted for the Brewing and Malting Business.
  For further particulars, and a sight of the Premises, apply to Mr. Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield.

29-Nov-1813
Hampshire Telegraph
TO DEBTORS AND CREDITORS.
  NOTICE is hereby given, that Messrs. ROBERT and THOMAS BRICKELL, of Petersfield, in the County of Southampton, Shopkeepers, have executed a Deed od Assignment of all their Estate and Effects to John Carpenter, of Portsmouth, in the County of Southampton, Grocer, and John Stapp, of Snowhill, in the City of London, Cheesemonger, in trust for themselves and the other Creditors of the said Robert and Thomas Brickell.—All Persons, therefore; indebted to the said Messrs. Brickell, or either of them, are desired forthwith to pay the amount of their respective Debts to the said Trustees, or their Solicitors; and all Persons having any claim or demand on the Estate of the said Messrs. Brickell, are requested to come in and execute the said Deed of Assignment, which is now lying at the office of Messrs. Hector and Mitchell, Solicitors to the said Trustees, Petersfield.

27-Dec-1813
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE (TO WIT.)
  JAMES SAYERS, formerly of Kingston-upon-Thames, in the county of Surrey, and late of Ramshill, near Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, Tallow-chandler and Grocer

1814

17-Jan-1814
Hampshire Chronicle

Buriton v. Petersfield.—The pauper, Edmund Mason, the subject of this case, was hired, by Mr. Hill, of Buriton, as a yearly servant. About five or six weeks before the expiration of the year, he had the misfortune to break his collar bone. He continued in the service of Mr. Hill till within about a fortnight of the end of the year, when he told his master he was not able to do his work, and went home to his father who lived at Petersfield. Soon after his going to his father’s he was paid money by Mrs. Hill, but could not recollect whether or not he received the whole of his wages. The counsel for the respondents contended, that his absence was a dispensation of service, and that his settlement was at Buriton. The Court ware of opinion, that it was a dissolution of the contract, and therefore quashed the order, which was for his removal from Petersfield to Buriton.

24-Jan-1814
Hampshire Telegraph

  WILLIAM BROWN, late of Sheet, near Petersfield, Horsekeeper, was some time since convicted in several penalties for having Game in his possession, and immediately afterwards ABSCONDED. Any Person apprehending the said Wm. Brown, or giving such information as shall cause him to be apprehended, shall receive a reward of TEN POUNDS from Richard Andrews, Petersfield.
  Brown is about 5ft. 7in. high, 30 years of age, dark complexion, and is supposed to have the care of some Stage Horses either in London or on some public road leading thereto.


11-Apr-1814
Hampshire Telegraph
Parish of Liss, near Petersfield.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by JOHN CAWLEY, on Wednesday the 9th of March, 1814, between the hours of three and five, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield,—A FREEHOLD MESSUAGE, consisting of Two Tenements, wood-house, garden, and appurtenances; with a Close of Land, containing two acres, pleasantly situated at Canaan, in the said parish of Liss, near the Portsmouth Turnpike-road.
  The tenants of the Premises, George Randall, and William Harrison, will shew the same; and further particulars may be known by application to Mr. Cannon, Solicitor, Petersfield.
11-Apr-1814
Hampshire Telegraph
OAK TIMBER.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by WM. MINCHIN, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Friday, the 15th day of April, 1814, between the hours of two and three o’clock in the afternoon, according to conditions to be then and there produced, in one Lot;—Sixty OAK TREES, with their Lop, Top, and Bark, numbered with white paint, standing on Adhurst Farm, in the occupation of Mr. Edward Munday, adjoining the Turnpike-road, one mile from Petersfield.
  For a view of the same apply to Mr. Munday, the tenant, and for particulars to Mr. J. Minchin, Petersfield.

2-May-1814
Hampshire Telegraph

 WHEREAS I, GEORGE LEACH, of the parish of Hambledon, in the county of Hants, did, on the 20th instant, in the public Market held at Petersfield, in the said county, make use of violent and abusive Language towards ANDREW SHAWYER, Bailiff to J. Richards, Esq. Of North House; for which Offence I hereby express my sorrow, and humbly beg the pardon and forgiveness of the said Andrew Shawyer.

GEORGE LEACH.  

 Witness,—JOHN BRUTTELL.
 HAMBLEDON, April 27, 1814.


8-Jun-1814
Bury & Norwich Post
BURY, JUNE 8.
DIED.
  On the 31st ult. at Petersfield, on his return to his seat in the Isle of Wight, in his 74th year, regretted and beloved by his family and friends, Sir Nash Grose, Knt. Late one of the Judges of the Court of King’s Bench.
10-Jun-1814
Stamford Mercury

  DIED.—Sir Nash Grose, late one of the Judges of the Court of King’s Bench, having previously been attacked with a paralytic stroke, stopped at the Dolphin in Petersfield, on the 31st ult. On his way to Priory, in the Isle of Wight, and had scarcely entered the house when he fell on a sofa and expired, in the 74th year of his age.


11-Jun-1814
Lancaster Gazette

  Sir Nash Grose, many years on of the Court of King’s Bench, stopped at the Dolphin Inn, in Petersfield, on the 30th ult. between two and three o’clock, on his way to the Priory, in the Isle of Wight; he had scarcely entered the room when he fell on a sofa and expired in about ten minutes, in the 74th year of his age. His remains were taken to the island and interred on Friday.


22-Aug-1814
Hampshire Chronicle

  On Thursday, a man habited as a petty officer in the navy, and armed with a pistol, stopped a post-boy on Batsey-hill, about three miles from Petersfield, on the road to Portsmouth, and robbed him of his watch and money, and afterwards took the horse he was riding on, on which he was going with an express to Havant, threatening his life if he moved from the spot. He rode the horse back through Petersfield and Liphook, stopped at the Horns Inn to drink some rum, where he was questioned by the waiter respecting the horse being a post horse. A few minutes afterwards, Mr. Dowby, the owner of the horse, with a post boy, came up, and the robber was pursued and overtaken, when he dismounted and attempted to escape, but was followed and secured.

22-Aug-1814
Evening Mail

  DARING FOOTPAD ROBBERY.—On Thursday, a man habited as a petty officer in the navy, and armed with a pistol, stopped a post-boy on Batsey-hill, about three miles from Petersfield, on the road to Portsmouth, and robbed him of his watch and money, and afterwards took the horse he was riding on, on which he was going with an express to Havant, threatening his life if he moved from the spot. He rode the horse back through Petersfield and Liphook, stopped at the Horns Inn to drink some rum, where he was questioned by the waiter respecting the horse being a post horse. A few minutes afterwards, Mr. Dowling, the owner of the horse, with a post boy, came up, and the robber was pursued and overtaken, when he dismounted and attempted to escape. He was followed and taken, and brought back, to be sent to Winchester


12-Sep-1814
Sussex Advertiser

  One day last week, Mr. William Earwicker, at Prerit, near Petersfield, in Hants, cut his throat, in a fit of insanity.

19-Sep-1814
Hampshire Chronicle
GAME DUTY.—LIST I.
COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON.
  LIST of Persons who have obtained GENERAL CERTIFICATES at the Rate of Three Pounds Thirteen Shillings and Sixpence each, for the Year 1814.
   (All from Petersfield Andrews, Richard, esq.
  Bonham, Thomas, esq.
  Greetham, Charles,
  King, Fielder, esq.
  Meeres, John,
  Whicher, Rev. John,

24-Sep-1814
Oxford Journal
DEATHS
  At his house, in the neighbourhood of Petersfield, Hants, Mr. William Bayley, a respectable yeoman, aged 40.

3-Oct-1814
Hampshire Chronicle

  Petersfield annual shew of sheep and cattle, took place on Tuesday se’nnight. There was a finer exhibition of stock, than at any former meeting.—The prizes were adjudged as follows:—
  A cup of 5 gs. to W. Blunt, Esq. for a pair of best ewes; a cup of 3 gs. to Mr. Read, for the second best ditto; a cup of 5 gs. to Mr. J. Pinnix, for the best one-year old ram; a cup of 3 gs. to Mr. Pittis, for the second ditto; a cup of 5 gs. to Mr. A Pinnix, for the best two-year old ram; a cup of 3 gs. to Mr. Hobbs, for the second best ditto; a cup of 5 gs. to Mr. Hobbs, for the second best ditto; a cup of 5 gs. to S. Scott, Esq. for the best ewe lambs; a cup of 3 gs. to Mr. Lipscomb, for the second best ditto; a cup of 5 gs. to Mr. Budd, for the best ram lamb; a cup of 3 gs. to James White, Esq. for the second best ditto; a cup of 5 gs. to J. Woods, Esq. for the best Merino ewes; a cup of 5 gs. to C. Coles, Esq. for the best Merino ram; a cup of 2 gs. to Mr. Smith, for the best heifer; a cup of 2 gs. to — Norris, Esq. for the best bull; a cup of 2 gs. to Lord Robert Spencer, for the best boar; a cup of 2 gs. to Mr. Eyles, for the best sow; 2 gs to Mr. Lipscomb’s shepherd, for raising lambs from upwards of 300 ewes; one guinea to Mr. E. Pinnix’s shepherd, for raising lambs from upwards of 100 ewes.
  The company, which was numerous and respectable, afterwards dined together at the Dolphin Inn

10-Oct-1814
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER, SATURDAY, OCT. 8.
HAMPSHIRE MUSICAL FESTIVAL
12th, 13th and 14th of OCTOBER
  The PUBLIC are respectfully informed, that according to the benevolent practice of the Choirs of Gloucester, Hereford, and Worcester, as well as other Musical Meetings, for CHARITABLE PURPOSES, Plates, to receive CONTRIBUTIONS, will be holden by the Directors, at the several Doors of the Cathedral, after each Morning Performance. Such Contributions being entirely voluntary, are indebted for the exclusive Benefit of the COUNTY HOSPITAL.
  We understand that the celebrated Musical Phenomena, the Master and Miss SMITHS, are on their way to this City, where they intend giving one Concert, prior to which and after, we are informed, that Mr. Smith also intends giving a Concert at each of the following Towns, viz.
  Petersfield, Friday, 21.—

17-Oct-1814
Hampshire Chronicle

  The Derbyshire Militia, under Major Bilbie, disembarked yesterday morning at Point, and marched to Petersfield on its route to Derby.

24-Oct-1814
Morning Post
BANKRUPTS.
  E. Hoar, Blendswoorth, corn-dealer, Nov. 8, at twelve, 9, at ten, and Dec. 3, at twelve, at the Ship and Bell Inn, Horndean. Attornies, Mr. Briggs, Exeter-street, Strand; Messrs. Hector and Mitchell, Petersfield; and Mr. Howard, Portsea.

6-Nov-1814
Windsor & Eton Press

  Saturday last, at Portsmouth, Harvy Johnson, about 16 years of age, was committed to the county gaol, on a charge of committing a burglary, by breaking open a box belonging to his master, and stealing about 110l. in bank notes and gold. He had been some month in the employ of one Whitney, who sells earthenware; the box which he broke open was kept in Whitney’s chamber, at his cottage, in Stanishaw-lane; he immediately set off for London with his plunder, and changed his clothes at Petersfield; but Whitney’s son overtook him at Godalming, and carried him before Lord Middleton. All the property, except about 20s. which he had spent, was found upon him.

7-Nov-1814
Hampshire Chronicle

  On Saturday last was married, at Petersfield, Mr. Charles Ralfe, son of the Rev. William Ralfe, Rector of Maulden, Bedfordshire, to Jane, fourth daughter of Edward Patrick, Esq. of Petersfield.


10-Nov-1814
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

  MR. CANNING AND THE CLAIMANT TO THE EARL-DOM OF FINDLATER.—There is at present confined as a prisoner in the Canongate gaol of Edinburgh, upon a writ at the instance of Geo. Canning, Sq. of Bolton-street, Piccadilly, county of Middlesex, M.P. (we believe the Member for Petersfield), a person of the name of Wm. Ogilvie, designating himself Earl of Findlater and Baron Banff. The debt is constituted by bond, in the English form, amounting to 3000l.; the bond is signed Findlater and Banff, it is followed up by a Decree before the Court of Session, as against William, Earl of Findlater; but the honourable plaintiff has, in the writ of caption, altered the designation to “William Ogilvie, calling himself Earl of Findlater;” and upon that, this soi-disant Peer of the Realm has been committed to prison. Being in a state of great poverty, his Lordship of Findlater applied to the Magistrates of Edinburgh for the benefit of the Scots Act of 1696 commonly called the “Act of Grace.”—This application was strenuously opposed by Mr. Canning, on the ground that the petitioner was an impostor, and that he had no right to the title of Earl of Findlater; that he had obtained the money from him on false pretences, &c. In answer to this, it was stated by the noble defendant, that his title to the Earldom of Findlater was undoubted; that he had been regularly served heir by a Jury before the Sheriff of Banff; that he had been countenanced and written to as Earl by several persons high in rank, and who had promised him every assistance, with money and otherwise, to procure his title to be recognised by the House of Lords, when in an evil hour he became acquainted with the plaintiff (Mr. Canning), who besieged him most closely, offering him any sum of money, even to the extent of 20,000l. if he would use his influence to get him returned for a Scotch Burgh. That he accordingly received 3000l. for this purpose, and his friends, finding he had joined with Mr. Canning, withdrew their countenance and support from him; in consequence of which, he and his family came to poverty; he could not get his title recognised by the House of Lords; and his friend Mr. Canning lost his Scottish Burgh, and is now also minus his 3000l. thus lent for electioneering purposes. These are the statements of the parties, of the truth of which we of course know nothing; but the Magistrates, in consideration of the whole circumstances of the case, and in respect, it is alledged by the petitioner, and not denied by the other party, that he granted a bond for the debt as Earl of Findlater, and subscribed the same by that signature, and not as William Ogilvie, designed in the letters of caption, modified an aliment of 5s. per day, to be paid and consigned to him by the creditor incarcerator, and which he is at present receiving from his opponent, Mr. Canning.


21-Dec-1814
Morning Post
BANKRUPTS
  John Rowland, Bramshott, Southampton, dealer, to surrender Jan. 18, at two, 19, at ten, and 31, at two, at the Anchor Inn, Liphook. Attornies, Mr. Charles Greetham, Petersfield; and Mr. John Allen, Clifford’s Inn, London.

1815

16-Jan-1815
Hampshire Telegraph

  Married, on the 29th ult. At Petersfield, Mr. Thomas Shoell, Jun. Baker, to Miss Mary Flood, both of that place.


25-Feb-1815
Morning Post
IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.
HOUSE OF LORDS, FRIDAY, FEB. 24,
  Counsel were heard on the part of the Appellant, in the case of Petersfield against the Officers of State in Scotland, as Representatives of his Majesty—Alexander Don, Esq. and others. No counsel appeared for the Respondents. Consideration of judgement deferred.

13-Mar-1815
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE ASSIZES.
Chase and others v. Patrick & Co.   The defendants are bankers at Petersfield, and this action was brought to recover £2733. The plaintiffs are assignees of Messrs. W. and T. Hurst, corn-factors at Portsea, bankrupts. Between the defendants and the bankrupt several money transactions had taken place; they were in the habit of drawing bills; and as these bills became due they sent at different times remittances to the amount of £2733, for the specific purpose of answering these bills. The question was, whether money given for a specific purpose could not be recovered. The plaintiffs were nonsuited on a point of law.
20-Mar-1815
Hampshire Telegraph
HANTS.
  TO be SOLD or LET by PRIVATE CONTRACT, with immediate Possession,—All those Two FARMS, with the Farm House, Cottage, and Lands thereto belonging, called or known by the names of RING’s GREEN, and OLD LITTEN FARMS, situate, lying, and being, in the Parish of Froxfield, containing together, by estimation, about 220 Customary Acres. The above Farms are situate about two miles from the Market Town of Petersfield, and adjoining the high road leading from Petersfield to Alton.—Land Tax redeemed.—The Crop to be taken at a fair valuation.
  For further particulars apply at the Office of Messrs. Butler & Padwick, Solicitors, Havant, Hants.

30-Mar-1815
Morning Post

  TO be LET, and entered on immediately, a Capital MANSION HOUSE, with suitable Offices and conveniences, for the reception of a large family, pleasantly situated within half a mile of Petersfield, commanding a beautiful view over the adjacent country. The House is situated on a dry soil, and remarkably healthy; has a lawn in front, a newly planed shrubbery, and an extensive walled in garden. Distance from London 54 miles, and Portsmouth 18; several coaches pass through Petersfield to and from London daily. The Premises may be let on Lease for 3, 6, or 9 years, as may be agreed upon. The House may be seen and further Particulars known, on application to Mr. Ralfe, No. 5, Dyer’s Buildings, Holborn.


10-Jun-1815
The Suffolk Chronicle or Weekly General Advertiser & County Express

  The following is painted upon a board, affixed at the entrance of Petersfield; “All persons found within this borough will be apprehended as vagrants.”

19-Jun-1815
Morning Post
FASHIONABLE ARRIVALS.

DEPARTURES

  White Thomas, Esq. for Petersfield, Sussex


20-Jun-1815
Manchester Mercury

Extraordinary Notice to Travellers—The following is painted upon a board affixed at the entrance of Petersfield, Hampshire, namely—“All persons found within this borough will be apprehended as vagrants.”



10-Jul-1815
Morning Post

  DIED—on the field of battle at Waterloo, on the 18th ult. Charles Jolliffe, Esq. Captain in the 23d Regiment of Infantry, R.W.F. He was third and youngest son of T.S. Jolliffe, Esq. of Ammerdown House, in the county of Somerset, formerly representative in Parliament for the Borough of Petersfield. Those only who knew him intimately can appreciate the rare qualities of this deceased young officer. The intrepid constancy of his character, his unwearied zeal and devotedness to the honourable profession he had embraced, will be long cherished in the memory of his former associates; while his untimely loss fills with the deepest grief his friends and family, who had anxiously looked forward to the maturity of an ardent and noble nature.

31-Jul-1815
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER, SATURDAY, JULY 29.
  This morning the Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Hampshire Agricultural Society took place in this city. The prizes were awarded as follow :—

  To the best ten South Down ewes that have bred up a lamb the same season—A cup of five guineas.—Mr. Blunt of Petersfield.


21-Aug-1815
Hampshire Chronicle
BANKRUPTS
  George Port, Petersfield, Hants, horse-dealer.

2-Sep-1815
The Ipswich Journal

  Last Sunday Lieut. Crowe, of the Marines, who was stationed at Horndean, Hants, to look out for deserters, rode over to Petersfield, to order his men billeted there to proceed to Portsmouth. On his return his horse stumbled, and threw him over his head, by which accident his neck was dislocated and his skill fractured, in consequence of which he died in a few hours.

14-Sep-1815
Cheltenham Chronicle

  At the annual shew of sheep held at Petersfield, on Tuesday last, a greater number of Southdown sheep were penned than before remembered.


18-Sep-1815
Hampshire Chronicle
GAME DUTY.—LIST I.
COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON.
  List of Persons who have obtained GENERAL CERTIFICATES at the rate of Three Pounds Thirteen Shillings and Sixpence each, for the Year 1815. (All in Petersfield)
  Andrews, R. esq.
  Bonham, T. esq.
  Greetham, C.
  King, F.
  Meeres, John,
  Small, J. jun.
  Whicher, Rev. J.
21-Sep-1815
Cheltenham Chronicle
Agriculture, Commerce, &c.
  At the annual shew of sheep held at Petersfield, on Tuesday last, a greater number of South-Downs were penned than ever before seen there, and were deemed by the judges and Gentlemen present to have been the most excellent in symmetry and fleece, and equal to any exhibition of the same stock in any part of the kingdom. After the shew the company adjourned to the Dolphin Inn, and partook of a dinner provided for the occasion.

3-Oct-1815
Kentish Gazette

  At Petersfield Market, on Wednesday, Lambs sold at from 10s. to 15s. and Ewes, 18s. to 24s. each. So great a reduction in the prices, in the course of one year, is unprecedented; the Ewes then, upon an average, fetched 36s. each. It is, therefore, reasonably expected that the consumer will experience a proportionate benefit from this great decrease in so necessary an article of life. It was remarked, that most of the lean stock at the above market, was bought by the butchers from Portsmouth.


9-Dec-1815
Caledonian Mercury

  The last title was derived by Charles Lenox, the first Duke of Richmond, natural son of Charles II. from his mother, Louisa de Querouelle, a French lady, who was created by the King Baroness Petersfield, Countess of Fareham, and Duchess of Portsmouth; and by Louis XIV, Duchess of Aubigny in France. Of this last title the Duke of Richmond was deprived by the Revolutionary Government of France; and we understand it has been recently restored to his Grace by the King of France.

1816

12-Jan-1816
Leicester Journal
BANKRUPTS.

DIVIDENDS,

  Jan. 30. George Port, Petersfield, horse-dealer at Guildhall.

25-Jan-1816
Bath Chronicle & Weekly Gazette

 DIED. … At Petersfield, Hants, Rich. Andrews, esq in his 77th year.


28-Jan-1816
Hampshire Chronicle

  A few days since, as R. Andrews, Esq. of Petersfield, was returning from shooting, with his servant, while getting over a hedge, the stick on which he stood gave way; he consequently fell, and broke several of his ribs. He languished till the following Saturday, and then expired, in the 77th year of his age.


17-Apr-1816
Hereford Journal
BANKRUPTS.

  J. BRIDGER, Steep, Southampton, farmer, May 1, 2, 25, at Dolphin Inn, Petersfield. Atts. Mitchell, Petersfield; or Briggs, Essex-street, Strand.
18-Apr-1816
Bahronicle & Weekly Gzette

  MARRIED. Thos. Smith, esq; of Shaldon, Hants to Mrs. Eyles, widow of J. Eyles, esq; of Petersfield.


31-Jul-1816
Hampshire Chronicle
LADIES’ BOARDING SCHOOL, PETERSFIELD, HANTS

  MRS. STOCKMAN and MISS RITSON, impressed with a deep sense of gratitude for the support they have received from Friends, beg the continuance of it, and inform them, and the Public, that their School will open again on the 22d instant. They indulge the hope, that they shall ever merit the Patronage they solicit, by paying unremitted attention to the morals and health, as well as to the improvement of their pupils.
  Terms moderate, and may be known on application at the School, or at Mr. Stockman’s, No. 61, Queen Street, Portsea.

19-Aug-1816
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER, SATURDAY, AUG. 17.

  The Anniversary Meeting of the Hampshire Auxiliary Bible Society was holden on Wednesday last, at St. John’s House, in this city, and was respectably and numerously attended.

 An investigation has lately been made into the actual deficiencies of bibles and testaments in the neighbourhood of Petersfield and Havant, from which it appeared, that out of 803 families visited, containing 4020 individuals; 467 families, containing 2296 individuals, were found destitute of a copy of the Holy Scriptures.


29-Sep-1816
Windsor & Eton Express
PETERSFIELD AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY.

  The annual meeting of this Society was held at Petersfield on Tuesday the 24th of Sept. The show of sheep and cattle, though not so numerous as last year, was equally as good. After the company had viewed the stock, they retired to the Dolphin, where several gentlemen, and the principal Agriculturalists in the neighbourhood, to the amount of upwards of thirty, sat down to an excellent dinner.

  The utmost conviviality prevailed till nine o’clock, when the company separated, much pleased with the proceedings of the day.

3-Oct-1816
Cheltenham Chronicle

  The Agricultural Society of Petersfield, Hants, held its annual meeting Tuesday last—R. Norris, Esq. of Basing Park, filled the chair, in the room of the late lamented Sir T. Miller, Bart.—premiums, as usual, awarded to exhibitors of improved stock, shepherds, &c.—this Society, at the suggestion of Mr. Ellman, resolved to petition Parliament to lay a protecting duty on foreign wool.

7-Oct-1816
Hampshire Telegraph
Agricultural State of the Kingdom

  The Report of the Board of Agriculture, which was suppressed, on account, as it is presumed, of the alarming truths it contained, being now published, we are enabled to make some interesting extracts from it. The Reports for Hampshire are made by the following experienced gentlemen :— …Mr. Patrick, of Petersfield; …
  EDWARD PATRICK.—The distress of the farmers is now exceedingly great, and every day increasing, in consequence of the very reduced price of corn and stock; and the great number of labourers now out of employ, and which are obliged to be supplied by parochial relief.

11-Nov-1816
Hampshire Chronicle
GAME DUTY.—LIST VII.
COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON.
  LIST of Persons who have obtained GENERAL CERTIFICATES at the rate of Three Pounds Thirteen Shillings and Sixpence each for the Year 1816.

 Hugonin, Gen. Francis  Nursted
 King, Fielder       Petersfield
 Small, John       Petersfield

2-Dec-1816
Hampshire Telegraph
ALTON SOUTH.

said Division,—Notice is hereby given.—That the first Petty Sessions for the said Division will be holden at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Monday the 16th day of December, 1816; and that the next meeting of the Magistrates, meeting in and for the said Division, will be held on Monday the 30th day of the same December, at the house of Thomas Carter, bearing the sign of the Trooper, in the Parish of Froxfield; and the Meetings of the Magistrates will be continued on every succeeding Monday fortnight, at the said places, alternately, until further notice.
  All Overseers of the Poor, Constables, and others, are particularly desired to take notice, that Business will commence precisely at twelve o’clock, at each place.
  By order of the Magistrates,
    HECTOR & MITCHELL, Division Clerks
  PETERSFIELD, Nov. 28, 1816.


2-Dec-1816
Hampshire Telegraph

  On Sunday last died, in the 70th year of his age, Mr. Thomas Seward, of Weston Farm, near Petersfield.


1817

27-Jan-1817
Hampshire Chronicle

  On Monday the Rev James Cookson was chosen Mayor for Petersfield. After the business was concluded at the Town Hall, the parties adjourned to the Dolphin Inn, to partake of a sumptuous dinner provided by Mr. Holdaway. The musical gentleman of Petersfield favoured the company with several glees, duets, and songs in the evening. The day was spent in harmony and conviviality.

27-Jan-1817
Hampshire Telegraph
Petersfield Association for Prosecuting Felons, &c.

  NOTICE is hereby given, that the ANNUAL MEETING of the Subscribers to this Society will be held on Monday the 3d of February, 1817, at the Red Lion Inn, Petersfield, at eleven o’clock in the forenoon, to inspect the Accounts, and make such Arrangements as may be necessary for the ensuing year.—Terms of Subscription &c. may be known on application to

HECTOR and MITCHELL,  
Clerks and Treasurers.

  PETERSFIELD,
January 24th, 1817.


3-Mar-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE LENT ASSIZES.
  The following prisoners stand committed for trial at the ensuing Lent Assizes, charged with the undermentioned offences, viz. :
  William Cribb, for breaking open and entering the dwelling-house of Wm. Carpenter, at Petersfield and stealing silver articles thereout.
3-Mar-1817
Hampshire Telegraph
WINCHESTER
SATURDAY, MARCH 1, 1817.
  Married, on Saturday last, at Littleton, near this City, Mr. William Peskett, Surgeon, of Petersfield, to Miss Sarah Fitt, daughter of Mr. Wm. Fitt, an eminent Farmer of the former place.

10-Mar-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER, SATURDAY, MARCH 9.
HANTS ASSIZES.
John Lee, for having King’s stores in his possession; Thomas Simpson, for stealing a quantity of bacon, the property of Thomas Waldren, at Dean; Wm. Dewey, for stealing a lead pump, belonging to his Majesty, at Gosport; Wm. Chubb, for a burglary in the house of W. Carpenter, at Petersfield; Isaac Holloway, for an attempt at highway robbery; to be transported for 7 years.
17-Mar-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY MEETING.
—000—
  A Meeting of the Nobility, Clergy, Gentry, and Freeholders of the county of Southampton, for the purpose of agreeing to a congratulatory Address to his Royal Highness the Prince Regent, was held at the Castle of the city of Winchester, on Tuesday last. The High Sheriff having read the Requisition, spoke as follows :—

 Mr COBETT.—It was not my intention to occupy your time one moment.—(Cries of Silence)—You will lose by that. It was not my intention to occupy the Meeting a moment, but it was necessary you should be informed that the Requisition first offered to the Sheriff was presented by Lord Cochrane, Mr. Goldsmith, Mr. Hinxman, Mr. Hector, of Petersfield, and several other respectable gentlemen.


14-Apr-1817
Salisbury & Winchester Journal

  STOLEN, on Saturday the 15th Match 1817, from out of the Grounds belonging to Mr. John Cobb, in Steep, near Petersfield, Hants,—An Iron-Gray GELDING, about 15 hands high, 7 years old, with a white stripe down his face, a few white spots on his body, and 2 white rings round his off hind leg, above the fetlock joint. TEN GUINEAS Reward will be paid on conviction to any person discovering the offender or offenders, by Mr. Cobb aforesaid; or Mr. Flooks, Wilton, near Salisbury.

14-Apr-1817
Hampshire Chronicle

  TO be SOLD by PRIVATE CONTRACT, A valuable THRESHING MACHINE, of Two-Horse Power, with rakes, screens, and every necessary apparatus. It will thresh wheat, barley, oats, and seeds of every description, in the most desirable manner. The whole of the machine is in the most complete state of repair, being new about three years since. The above valuable conveniency will be found well worth the attention of any Agriculturalist, as it will be disposed of on very reasonable terms.
  For particulars apply to Mr. George Rich, Mill-wright, Petersfield (if by letter post-paid).


5-May-1817
Hampshire Telegraph
WESTMARK,
A most desirable FREEHOLD FARM, near Petersfield, HANTS.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by T. WILLMER, on Tuesday the 3d day of June, 1817, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, between the hours of three and five in the afternoon,—All those excellent and very desirable FREEHOLD LANDS and PREMISES, well-known by the name of WESTMARK FARM, situated in the Tything of Sheet, near Petersfield, Hants; consisting of a firm-built Dwelling-house, with all the various conveniences and apartments requisite to an Agricultural domestic establishment; a large brick-built granary, two very excellent barns, five good stables (great part in stalls), and capable of receiving 30 horses; convenient cow-pens, large hay-house and hovel, two cart houses, fuel houses, piggeries, and other minor offices, closely connected and encircling a large ans well-sheltered yard or gate-room; also, a fruitful orchard, and two good gardens; together with 85 acres of arable, 31 acres of meadow and pasture, and sic acres of well-planted thriving coppice Land, or thereabouts (more or less), lying convenient to two extensive common rights.—The Dwelling-house and Out-buildings are in very good repair, the latter particularly, having been recently erected at a very considerable expense by the late Proprietor, Mr. John Port, deceased; the wholeof the Land (lying nearly in a ring fence), is also in the very best state of cultivation.
Westmark —commanding open and extensive views, is most pleasantly situated not more than two miles from Petersfield, and at a very short distance from the London and Portsmouth turnpike road; a situation eminently favourable to the Sportsman, in the centre of an abundant game country, and contiguous to a considerable trout stream.—Is subject to two small Annuities, about 6l. Land-Tax redeemed at 112l. 8s. which sum is to be paid by the Purchaser, over and above the amount bid for the Estate.—Timber and Tellers to be taken by valuation.—Poor rates more favourable than in general.
  For further particulars, and for viewing the Farm, apply at Westmark-House.

5-May-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED.
W. Partington, of Manchester,

money scrivener

BANKRUPTS.

  A. Jarman, of the Tything of Sheet, Southampton, tanner, May 19, at one, May 20, at eleven, and June 14, at one, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, Southampton. Attorney, Mr. J. Allen, Clifford’s Inn.

22-Jun-1817
Bell's Weekly Messenger
BANKRUPTS.
  THOMAS MELLIS, Liss, Southampton, maltster, July 4, at one, 5, at ten, and Aug. 2, at one, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield. Attornies, Mr. Greetham, Petersfield; and Mr. Allen, Clifford’s Inn, London.
30-Jun-1817
Saunders’s News-Letter
MARRIAGES,
  At Eyam, Derbyshire, James Wicher, Esq. of Petersfield, to Anna, second daughter of Major-General C. N. Cookson, Royal Artillery.

1-Jul-1817
Manchester Mercury
Bankrupts to Surrender.
Mells Thomas, now or late of the parish of Lis, in the county of Southampton, maltster, d and ch July 4, 5 and Aug. 2, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield. Attorney, Mr. Greetham, Petersfield. Com sealed June 14. Pet Cr J Cobb, of Steep, yeoman.
9-Jul-1817
Morning Chronicle

  Yesterday morning the Marquis and Marchioness of ANGLESEA left town for Petersfield, on a visit to Capt. PAGET, where they are expected to remain for three weeks.


31-Jul-1817
Morning Chronicle

 1. THE COLONIAL JOURNAL, No. V. containing, A View and Description of Petersfield Sugar Plantation—New West Indian Sketches”—Account of the Species of American Camel—Mistakes of Pennant, Shaw, &c.—Jamaica, a Poem, by the late Bryan Edwards, Esq.—On Improving the Navigation of the River St. Lawrence—Present State of the British Sugar-Trade—Cultivation of Tobacco in England—Virtues of the Guaco-Plant—Papers on Florida—Natural History of the Stormy Petrel pr Mother Cary’s Chicken—Colonial Collections—Colonial Bibliography—East and West India Trade of the United States—Mr. Walton on the Isthmus of Panama, and Land Route over the Buenos Ayres Plains—Review of De Pradt’s Colonies and present Revolutions of America—Colonial Acts for the registration of Slaves—Causes of the Decrease of the Slaves in the West Indies—Proposition of a Discriminative Registry of Slaves, showing the respective Numbers of Males and Females, Africans and Creoles, Slave Deaths, Slave Births, &c.—Public Papers—Parliamentary Proceedings—Colonial Notices—Occurrences—Appointments—Marriages—Deaths—Price Current—State of Markets—Packets, &c, &c.
  2. The COLONIES and the present AMERICAN REVOLUTION. By M. De Pradt. Translated from the French. One vol. 8vo. Price 12s. in boards.


17-Aug-1817
Windsor & Eton Express
ACCIDENTS AND OFFENCE,


  A letter from Petersfield says, that a horrid murder has been committed near that place, on the body of a man who was found dead, with his throat cut, and otherwise dreadfully mangled. The perpetrators of the crime have at present eluded the vigilance of the police.

18-Aug-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
HANTS AUXILIARY BIBLE SOCIETY

 … since the last Annual Meeting a Branch Society has been formed in the eastern part of the county, connected with which two very efficient Ladies Bible Associations have been established, one at Petersfield, and another for Emsworth and Warblington, by means of which many poor persons have been enabled to supply themselves with copies of the Scriptures, at cost or reduced prices.


18-Aug-1817
Salisbury & Winchester Journal

  HORRID MURDER.—A man, apparently about 30 years of age, who had been previously seen travelling on the road with a sailor, was found murdered on Thursday morning last, between 9 and 10 o’clock, in a hay field adjoining the Portsmouth turnpike, about a quarter of a mile from Petersfield. Bills are circulated with a full description of the deceased, in order, if possible, that the villain who committed the murder may be apprehended.

23-Aug-1817
Oxford Journal

 An atrocious murder was discovered, near Petersfield, on Thursday morning last. The unfortunate victim is supposed to have been in the habit of travelling the country with crockeryware. His body was discovered about 10 o’clock in the morning, in a hay-field, close adjoin the turnpike road, within a quarter of a mile of Petersfield; his breeches, or pantaloons, and hat, were missing; the body, which had several mortal stabs about it, did not appear to have lain long in this state: on his shirt was marked “Z. Searson, No. 7, 1811” The perpetrator of this foul and apparently cold-blooded act, is supposed to be a sailor, with whom the deceased was seen in company on the previous afternoon and evening. The sailor is a short stature; and it is supposed he went on board the Vengeur, in this harbour, to enter; but that ship not being in want of men, he was landed, at his particular request, on the Gosport shore, near Forton. Mr. Hunt took the most active and judicious means to trace his steps there.—Portsmouth Telegraph.


10-Sep-1817
Hereford Journal

  The man who lately committed the murder near Petersfield in Hampshire, has been taken in the neighbourhood of Horndean, about 10 miles from Portsmouth. He confessed his crime, and said that the deceased was also a murderer and a robber.

18-Sep-1817
Morning Chronicle

  WANTED to PURCHASE, a FREEHOLD ESTATE, with a good Gentleman’s Residence, from 40 to 100 miles from London. Rental about 1000l. a year.—Letters, with particulars, addressed to A. B. Post Office, Petersfield, Hants.


22-Sep-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
GAME DUTY—LIST II.—COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON.
  LIST of Persons who have obtained GENERAL CERTIFICATES at the rate of Three Pounds Thirteen Shillings and Sixpence each, for the Year, 1817.
    (All from Petersfield)
  Bonham, Thomas, Esq.
  Greetham, Charles,
  King, Fielder, Esq.
  Meeres, John,
  Whitear, John,
22-Sep-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
THREE GUINEAS REWARD.
  LEFT at the Anchor Public-house, Ram’s Hill, near Petersfield,—A CHILD, about 14 months old, by a Man of the name of Thomas Smith, of the following description, and who is supposed to be in Sussex:—sandy complexion, stands about five foot nine inches, and in walking he wides at his toes: he was dressed in a red soldier’s jacket, and a dirty round frock over it, about sixty years of age, and speaks through his nose.—A REWARD of THREE GUINEAS will be given to any Person apprehending and bringing the said Person to the Parish Officers of the Tything of Sheet, near Petersfield.

13-Oct-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
GAME DUTY—LIST IV.—
COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON.
  LIST of Persons who have obtained GENERAL CERTIFICATES at the rate of Three Pounds Thirteen Shillings and Sixpence each, for the Year, 1817.
   …Hugonin, Francis, Esq. Nursted; …Leer, Geo. Petersfield;
20-Oct-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER, SATURDAY, OCT. 18.

 Seventeen appeal cases were heard; but they possessed no feature of importance, and were determined as follows:—
 … Bepton and Petersfield—Order confirmed.


27-Oct-1817
Morning Post
FASHIONABLE CHANGES.
  … Sir Arthur and Lady Paget, at Cowesfield-hall, Romsey, from Up-park, Petersfield;

1-Nov-1817
Morning Post
FASHIONABLE CHANGES.
  The Duke and Duchess of Argyle, in Upper Brook-street, from Petersfield, Hants; …
3-Nov-1817
Hampshire Telegraph

  The Duke and Duchess of Argyle, with the Earl and Countess of March, have been for this week past on a visit to the Hon. Capt. Paget, at his house, Fair Oak Lodge, near Petersfield.


24-Nov-1817
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER, SATURDAY, NOV. 22.
  A GREAT proportion of our columns is this week filled with a recital of the solemnities which took place in the Metropolis, and in this and the neighbouring counties, on the day when the last and solemn rites were paid to the mortal remains of her Royal Highness the Princess CHARLOTTE.

 [The inhabitants of Petersfield manifested a degree of Sympathy on the late melancholy occurrence highly to their credit. Wednesday morning awfully commenced by the tolling of the Church bell (muffled); the shops were shut, and Divine worship was numerously attended. The Rev. I. Whicher preached an impressive sermon on the occasion, from the 23d chapter of Numbers, the latter part of the 10th verse, “Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his.” The Choir sang an appropriate anthem and hymn; three mourning peals were rung at intervals; indeed every person seemed desirous to shew that respect, which is alone due to departed worth. So uncertain are the vicissitudes of life, that our inimitable Shakespeare has compared it to the seasons :—
   “Thus sometimes hath the brightest day a cloud;
   “And after Summer evermore succeeds
   “Barren Winter, with his wrathful nipping cold;
   “So cares and joys abound, as seasons fleet.”


30-Nov-1817
Windsor & Eton Express
A LATE MURDER AT PETERSFIELD

The following statement is published in The observer, as from a respectable correspondent, who vouches for its correctness:— ‘A little more than two months ago(in the hay harvest) as Mr. Munday, a respectable farmer, within a short distance of Petersfield, was walking about ten o’clock in the morning over one of his hay fields, he found one of the hay cocks very much tumbled; he got a fork, and was putting it in its original form as he left it on the preceding night, when the prongs of the fork came in contact with a hard substance. Mr. Munday removed the hay, and, to his great surprise and terror, found the mangled corpse of a man, partly naked. The body presented a most shocking spectacle, being neatly covered with deep cuts, one of them very large on the right side; another, which appeared to have been done with a long knife, pierced below the right eye to the back of the head: and the right hand was nearly cut off. The hat and the breeches were missing. Mr. Munday immediately gave information of the circumstances to the officers of the town (Petersfield), and the body was immediately removed to the Jolly Sailors public-house at Petersfield, and most of the inhabitants went to see it, for the purpose of discovering who he was.
  ‘The landlord of a public-house at Petersfield recollected the deceased being at his house on the day before he was found murdered. A sailor and several other persons were in his company, and at times in conversation with him. He then had two bundles with him, and left the house as it was getting towards evening, with the bundles in his possession. The sailor and the other men left the public-house first, and were followed shortly after by the deceased. From the statements of different persons who saw the deceased and the sailor in conversation together, he was suspected to be the murderer; and it was found that a man answering the sailor’s description had gone on board the Vengeur on the morning the murder was discovered, and wished to enter, but the ship having sufficient men, he was landed on the Gosport shore on the same day at his own particular request. The Magistrates were very active in dispatching persons to trace his steps, and he and several others have been apprehended; but they gave such satisfactory accounts of where they were on the night the murder was committed, that they were discharged. The agitation of Petersfield was very great, every one seemed eager to ferret out the murderers, but days and weeks rolled on, and nothing transpired to fix suspicion on any one of the residents of Petersfield. The evidence of Mr. Munday was taken before the Coroner’s Jury, and also that of others who had seen the deceased in the town of Petersfield on the day prior to his being found so barbarously butchered. The surgeon who examined the corpse discovered 21 wounds about the body. It was apparent that the deceased had made great resistance, and being a very strong powerful man, it was conjectured that there were more than one person concerned in the foul transaction. On the shirt of the deceased the name of “Z. Searson, Nov. 7, 1811”—The body was kept unburied that it might be owned, until it became so putrid that it was found necessary to put it under ground, without his relatives being discovered, or it being ascertained what way of life the deceased was in, though it was conjectured that he was in the crockery-ware business. The clothes that were left on the body were a velveteen jacket and waistcoat, and a cloth frock. From the circumstances of every suspected person in Petersfield being satisfactorily cleared of having had any hand in the murder, it became the general opinion that the murderers must have been persons who had come from some other place for the purpose of committing depredations on the highway, and from the deceased making great resistance, they had dispatched him.
  ‘The murder and supposed parricide which was committed at Godalming, which place is about 14 miles from Petersfield, brought to mind the mysterious murder of the unknown man in Munday’s hay field; and when it was learnt that young Chennell and Chalcroft were in custody on suspicion of having murdered old Mr. Chennell and his housekeeper, some of the inhabitants recollected seeing young Chennell and Chalcroft in Petersfield on the night the murder was supposed to have been perpetrated. The circumstance was communicated to the proper authority; every information that could be gathered to criminate or clear the suspected parties was solicited; and the following are the chief grounds of suspicion which caused young Chennell and Chalcroft to be the suspected murderers of the unknown man:—Chennell and Chalcroft were in the habit of travelling with two horses from Godalming through the villages and towns to Portsmouth. The horses carried hampers, loaded sometimes with goods which were intrusted to them to carry from one town or village to the next. It was ascertained that they left Petersfield on the night the murder was committed, on their way to Godalming. The day the man was found murdered at Petersfield, a hat was found within a mile and a half of Godalming, which there is every reason to believe was the hat worn by the murdered man, and that the perpetrators must have gone from Petersfield towards Godalming. Since the apprehension of young Chennell and Chalcroft, some other circumstances have transpired to further elucidate that which was but suspicion of a very remote nature. In the lodgings of Chalcroft and young Chennell, articles have been found which they cannot give an account of, and which it is supposed were the property of the murdered man.
  ‘On the 26th ult. The constables of Guildford were ordered by the Magistrates to search a warehouse in which the deceased Mr. Chennell kept the horses’ corn, the key of which was in the possession of Chalcroft on the morning when the violent deaths of Mr. Chennell and his housekeeper were discovered. Under an old chest was found a pair of smallclothes stained with gore, of which no account could be given; they could not have been old Chennell’s, because those he wore were found in his bed-room; and the blood which was upon the former not having a new appearance, it was presumed that they must have been the property of some other victim. The property found in the prisoners’ lodgings was a shirt and other linen articles, which the person who has washed for the prisoners for a long time has stated her belief that they do not belong to the prisoners. This property is supposed to be part of what was contained in the poor fellow’s bundles; but from his not being owned, and none of his relatives being then discovered, no one could be brought forward to identify the property. Subsequent to the above, facts more decisive against the prisoners have transpired. From the exertions of the officers of Petersfield and Guildford, the father of the unfortunate man has been discovered; he is of respectable character, and is clerk of the Three Cups Waggon-office, Aldersgate-street. He was formerly a carrier in partnership with his son, and failed in business. They resided in Lincolnshire, and sent goods by their own boats on the canal to different parts of the kingdom. Since their failure, the father, from his excellent character, got the situation in which he now is; the deceased, who had got a little property, resolved to husband it, and endeavour to acquire more by going to sea. He had a dozen shirts made, such as are usually worn by seamen, and his father gave him on of his, marked with writing ink, “Z. Searson, Nov. 7, 1811,” which the deceased put on to travel to the seaport town. The deceased left London to go to Portsmouth on the 12th August, and when he got to Petersfield, he went to a public-house, a rendezvous for sailors, to obtain information where he could enter on board a vessel. He was advised to go to Portsmouth, and left the public-house on the night of the 13th of August, and it is supposed was met on the other side of Petersfield by Chennell and Chalcroft, and there murdered and robbed.
  Mrs Searson has been down, and was examined before Lord Middleton on the 27th ult. The linen found in one of the prisoners’ lodgings were shewn to her, and, after inspecting it, she swore positively that a shirt produced was the property of her son. There was no mark upon it, but she knew it by its work, for she had made it herself, and it was of the same cloth as the eleven others which he had when he was robbed. She stated also, that the deceased had some money in his possession, perhaps 2l. or 3l. when he left town; and a day or two before he left London he made a pocket in the inside of his waistcoat to keep his money in, that it might be safe. When deceased was found, the pocket was turned inside out, and the money gone. Young Chennell and Chalcroft are also committed upon suspicion of the murder of this man, whose name is William Searson.’

———

On the 27th ult. George Chalcroft, the brother of William Chalcroft, now in prison, charged with the murder of Chennell, senior Was examined before Lord Middleton, charged with robbing his employer, Mr. Smith, of Eashing-mills, near Godalming, and was committed to Horsemonger-lane gaol. A few days ago a shirt stained with gore was found upon the wheel of the mill. The mill-pool was dragged, and several articles of wearing apparel were discovered. G. Chalcroft, since his commitment to the same prison where his brother is confined, has been suspected of being concerned in the murder at Petersfield. It has been ascertained that he was there on the night when the murder was perpetrated. Mrs. Searson, mother of the unfortunate man who was murdered, was examined before Lord Middleton; she identified some of the property which has been found in Chalcroft’s lodgings and in the mill-dam, to be that which her son had in his possession when he left London.


1-Dec-1817
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser
1-Dec-1817
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

 On Wednesday last Mr. Searson and his wife (parents of young Searson) went to Godalming, and had an interview with Lord Middleton. A few days previous to the arrival of Mr. and Mrs. Searson, at Godalming, a bundle had been found in a pool of shallow water, near Esham Mill, about two miles from Godalming. It consisted of a shirt wrapped up in an apron, which Mrs. Searson no sooner saw, than she exclaimed, “That is my poor lad’s shirt;” and positively swore to it as being one which she made with several others for her son, previous to his going to sea, and which he had with him in a bundle at the time of the catastrophe. The apron in which the shirt was enclosed, was identified as the property of a person in custody on another charge of murder.


8-Dec-1817
London Courier & Evening Gazette
ROBBERY and MURDER NEAR FARNHAM.
  In former numbers of this Paper we have given accounts of George Chennell, jun. of Godalming, and William and George Chalcroft, his associates being committed to Horsemonger-lane Gaol, upon suspicion of having committed two murders, one of old Mr. Chennell and his housekeeper, at Godalming, and the other, previously, of a man named Searson, within a quarter of a mile of Petersfield. We have now to add the particulars of a third barbarous murder, supposed to have been committed by young Chennell and his associates. About June, 1816, an elderly man named Stilwell, who possessed a cottage and a few acres of land in the parish of Frencham, upon the borders of Holt Forest, which is situated within four miles of Farnham and about nine miles from Godalming, was found by a neighbouring farmer lying in the passage of his house, having been horridly butchered. His body was cut and mangled too dreadful to describe accurately. Near thirty wounds were discovered on the body, most of them of such a nature as was supposed would have been sufficient to have caused almost instantaneous dissolution. The deceased was a very extraordinary character; penurious in the extreme; and had hoarded by his sole labour some hundred pounds. He was a married man, but had been separated from his wife on account of a disagreement between them, from her disposit on being so opposite to his. After the separation, he never suffered a female to come near his house. He kept several cows, poultry, and other things connected with husbandry. He was the sole and entire manager of every thing. He milked the cows, churned the butter, tilled the ground, and regularly every Thursday he went with the produce of his small farm to Farnham market. By his exceeding penurious mode of living he acquired considerable property, and so careful was he to secure it from robbers that might attack him by day (for he lived at a considerable distance from any other house) or by night, that he always kept his doors locked and his windows fastened, and if any person went to pay or receive money from him, they had to wait until he unlocked the door, and the moment he admitted them into his house he invariably locked the door, and fastened them in his house, before he proceeded to do business with them. The day preceding that on which he was found murdered, he had been to a friend of his, a butcher, at Farnham, to ask him if he knew any person who wanted a few hundred pounds on interest, and was willing to give him good security for the money. This friend informed him that he did not know any such person; but he would inquire before the next market day. He always went to one particular public-house at Farnham, where he confined himself to a half-pint of beer; he on that day conversed with several persons, and was generally known to have a heavy purse. It was supposed that he was dodged from Farnham to his own house by a sea-faring man, whom he was seen in conversation with, but from circumstances which arose during the investigation before the Coroner, such suspicion seemed to be not at all confirmed; but, on the contrary, disproved. The witness who was examined before the Coroner, stated, that he found Mr. Stilwell’s front-door open, a circumstance never before known by him, and which gave him some surprise. When he entered the passage, he found a stream of blood on the floor, which lay in clots aloung the ground from the front to the back door, at which place the lifeless body of the old man lay weltering in his own blood. The corpse was quite cold, and life appeared to have been extinct some hours: it was, therefore, the general opinion, that he was murdered on the preceding night. The witness found in Mr. Stilwell’s garden two knives with common wood handles, such as are used by shoemakers for cutting their leather; they were covered with blood, and appeared to be the weapons used by the murderers for dispatching the old man. From their being two knives it appeared that there must have been more than one person concerned in the atrocious deed. That the villains broke into the house before Mr. Stilwell arrived from Market was the general opinion, and waited in the house until he returned: it is supposed that when he entered the front door and locked it they attacked him, and that he struggled with them from the front door along the passage to the place where he fell near the back door, as there was a track of blood from one door to the other. After he was dispatched the boxes in which he kept his money were broke open, and all the bills and gold which he had hoarded carried off. On their return from the house they threw the knives into the garden. The back window of Mr. Stilwell’s house was found to have been the place where the assassins entered the premises, from its being broke open with an iron crow. Two persons were seen about the neighbourhood, but they could not be traced, and the sailor who was suspected was discharged. Subsequently a man named Jeffreys was apprehended, and examined, on suspicion of being the murderer, but he proved himself innocent, and he was discharged. From that period not a single event has taken place, until the apprehension of young Chennell and his companion, that could in the least tend to elucidate this mysterious murder and robbery.
  Since the committal of G. Chennell, jun. and the Chalcrofts, by Lord Middleton, and the investigation taking place relative to the murder near Petersfield, another investigation has, at the instance of his Lordship, been proceeding into the mysterious murder of Mr. Stilwell. The house of Mr. Stilwell is on the borders of a forest called Holt Forest. At the time the murder was committed, the younger Chennell and Chalcroft were at work in the forest in the employ of Mr. Marshall, of Godalming. Upon reference to Mr. Marshall’s books, it appears that they were timber carting; that is, they were drawing timber from Holt Forest to Godalming. The knives, stained with crimson gore, found in old Mr. Stilwell’s garden, were produced before his Lordship. A man, who was in the employ of old Mr. Chennell at the time Mr. Stilwell was murdered, was examined: upon looking at the knives he said, that he would not swear that they were old Mr. Chennell’s, but it was his frim opinion that they were. The place where Chennell and Chalcroft were at work was not more than two-thirds of a mile distant from Mr. Stilwell’s house, and from two strange men being seen near the house on the night Mr. Stilwell returned from Farnham market; from Chennell and Chalcroft being at work so very near his house; and from two knives being found, such as are used by shoe-makers, and which are believed to have been the property of old Mr. Chennell—they are suspected of being the perpetrators of this murder and robbery, in addition t the black catalogue already enumerated.
  We have stated merely plain facts (having avoided all extraneous matter that might tend to prejudice the parties at their trials), the accuracy of which we can vouch for. We understand that Chennell jun. and the Chalcrofts will be tried first for the murder of Mr. Chennel, sen. and his house-keeper; and if the evidence should not be sufficiently conclusive to convict them, they will be put upon their trials either for the murder of the young man at Petersfield, or of Mr. Stilwell.

1818

28-Jan-1818
Bury & Norwich Post

  Two poachers were taken one night last week, on the estate of Mr. Bonham, near Petersfield, after a desperate resistance, which lasted full three quarters of an hour, by 17 men, appointed to guard the game.


7-Feb-1818
Oxford University & City Herald

Poachers.—This system of depredation has lately been carried to an alarming extent in the neighbourhood of Petersfield, particularly on the properties of T. Bonham, Esq. and Sir Harry Fetherstonhaugh, Bart. One of the men was sentenced to seven years transportation at the Petworth Sessions. He was taken whilst ensnaring game, in the night, with a party of 20 or more persons, who were armed in various ways, and who compelled 7 gamekeepers to desist from hindering them in their unlawful occupation. A few nights since, a party were interrupted by Mr. Bonham’s gamekeepers, and a sharp contest ensued, which might have been fatal to the keepers, but for the timely coming up of the servants of Sir H. Fetherstonhaugh, who were attracted to the spot by the firing of guns. The poachers immediately gave way, but five of them were taken. Some of them were armed with guns; one pheasant and some snares were found on them. They have been committed to Winchester gaol.
  Another poacher has been committed to the same gaol under Lord Ellenborough’s Act; who, it appears, having been closely watched whilst poaching, and finding himself so, he returned home; when some of the keepers endeavoured to secrete themselves behind a large tree in front of his cottage, to watch his going out again; when he deliberately took aim and shot one of them in the face. The man is much, but not dangerously hurt.


2-Mar-1818
Hampshire Telegraph
SHEET, NEAR PETERSFIELD.—HANTS
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by Mr. MINCHIN, at the Dolphin Inn, at Petersfield, on Wednesday the 1st of April, 1818, at three o’clock in the afternoon,—
  Lot 1.—All that desirable FREEHOLD FARM, situate in the Tything of Sheet, containing about 68 Customary Acres of Arable and Copse Land, together with a barn, stable, and gate-room thereon, now in the occupation of Mr. Edward Mundy, whose term will expire on the 11th day of October next.—The Timber to be taken at a valuation.
  This Estate is situate in a good sporting country, abounding with game, has extensive common rights, and adjoins the turnpike-road from London to Portsmouth.—Land Tax is redeemed; and the Poor Rates are moderate.
  Lot 2.—A LEASEHOLD DWELLING-HOUSE, situate in the Town of Petersfield, now in the occupation of Mr. Richard Young, as tenant-at-will, at the yearly rent of 15l.
  This Lot is in good repair, and is a comfortable Residence for a small family.
  For further particulars apply (if by letter, post-paid), to Messrs. Hector & Mitchell, Solicitors, Petersfield.
9-Mar-1818
Hampshire Chronicle

  CROWN BAR.—The following prisoners were tried and received sentence as under :—
William Tremain was arraigned for having forged notes in his possession; and also for having, on the 11th of August last, at Petersfield, uttered a false and fictitious £1, purporting to be of the bank of England. The prisoner pleaded guilty to the first part of the offence, in consequence of which no evidence was adduced in support of the charge of uttering.—14 years transportation.


16-Mar-1818
Morning Chronicle

  Petersfield has just displayed an unexpected spirit.—It has advertised for a Candidate at the next General Election, to represent its interests in Parliament. Independence must be his leading quality.

23-Mar-1818
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE FIRE-OFFICE.
  … Agents …
  Petersfield, A. Andrews;

24-Mar-1818
Morning Chronicle

  THOMAS ANDREW MINCHIN, Esq. Banker, of Portsmouth, has canvassed the Borough of Petersfield, and we are informed there is no doubt, of his ultimate success.—the exertions of this Borough, after 43 years political thraldom, are highly worthy of imitation.

27-Mar-1818
Chester Chronicle

  SCRAPS—Collected from the London papers
  THURSDAY.—Petersfield advertising for an independent Candidate!



23-Mar-1818
Salisbury & Winchester Journal

Freeholders of Petersfield!—Our borough is one of the most ancient in the kingdom. It has repeatedly in times past had immunities and privileges granted by several charters, all at length confirmed by Queen Elizabeth; yet these have almost all been lost to us by disuse. Our Mayor, Aldermen, Recorder, and Town Clerk, are become officers in NAME ONLY as to any judicial authority, and which not one of them exercises. Within our own memory our court for recovery of small debts has been disused; and by most illegal and unconstitutional means, our privilege of chusing our representatives has dwindled to a mere shadow. In former times Petersfield was a more respectable town than now, and many wealthy families resided in and near it who promoted its welfare; but when the system took root which robbed us of our rights, their attachment to the borough ceased, and they quitted a residence no longer desirable. But were its privileges restored, opulent families would have inducements to be amongst us, and identify themselves with our interests, as it would be theirs to conciliate our esteem and confidence.
  Our Corporation ought not to have the semblance merely of authority, but the substance; our Mayor, Aldermen, Recorder, and Town Clerk, should resume their functions; and the Mayor reside on the spot, not as the present one dies, 60 miles from us! He should be actually a magistrate administering justice, and with such a restoration of our privileges our prosperity would revive.*
  After the memorable contest in the year 1775, between Capt. Luttrel and William Jolliffe, Esq. (the ancestor of one of the present members), and Abraham Hume, Esq. Mr. William Jolliffe in resentment for the stand which the independent freeholders of that day made for their rights, was heard repeatedly to vow he would never more reside in the place, and that if he could he would make us “hewers of wood and drawers of water,” before he had done with us, and as he could not do this, otherwise than like the man who cut off his nose to be revenged of his face, he began in time to desolate his own domain and family mansion, which became soon a heap of ruins. Other mansions were also deserted; the family of Mr. Gibbon, the celebrated author of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, was one of great importance to the town, and in one of his works he laments their disposal of their burgageholds in it.
  Col. Jolliffe, one of the present Members and the Lord of the Manor, is a most respectable man and a brave soldier, but he never has resided amongst us. It is not however against him, but against the system, by which during a series of years the privileges of the borough have been wrested from us, that our stand at this time is made. Col. Jolliffe found the borough what it is. Ever since Capt. Luttrel’s contest no opponent until now started, and during the 43 years which have elapsed, the Mr. Jolliffe’s as successive Lords of the Manor have from time to time, where they could, prevailed on freeholders to sell them the fee-simple of their lands, and to take back in lieu of it grants of long terms of years, whilst they kept the fee-simple vested in persons of their own nomination, whom they procured to vote at elections as they directed; and by such factitious votes known by the name of faggots, they have always had a majority at their command, not of the bona fide proprietors, but of persons who are trustees merely of their own property; and thus at all elections, since the year 1775, the Mr. Jolliffe for the time being has been returned whom he would to Parliament. The farce of an election has always taken place, but generally without even one of the candidates being present, and the faces of most of those besides the Mr. Jolliffe for the time being have never been seen in the town; and by the unconstitutional means of buying and selling one of its seats in Parliament, has the representation of Petersfield been thus continued. The period has however at length arrived, when we who are the few remaining electors, not amounting to 25 in number, are determined to assert our own rights against such a corrupt system. The question lies in the smallest possible compass, whether persons who are not bona fide purchasers, and proprietors in their own rights; but trustees only of Col. Jolliffe, are entitled to vote. This on the part of the real freeholders is contended to be illegal and unconstitutional.
  At the poll every voter must swear that he is a bona fide, actually and truly in good faith, the proprietor in his own absolute right, or he is not a legal voter; and besides his sacrificing the best interests of his country., and contracting the guilt of perjury if he be not a bona fide actual proprietor, and exposing himself to the penalties of the law on an indictment of perjury; even the grantor of the property creating such factitious vote, does not only by Act of Parliament forfeit to the voter the property contained in his conveyance as such voter’s own absolute property, but as well every person concerned in preparing the conveyance, as the voter too himself on his part becomes each liable to a penalty of 40l. to the candidate against whom he votes, or to any person first sueing for the same; and they are also liable to punishment by the House of Commons for corrupt practices.
  It behoves every one then to be aware of the consequences to which such conduct may lead; but independent of all this there are certain qualifications incident to the burgage tenement giving a right of voting, that must render it impossible for Col. Jolliffe under the circumstances which have transpired, to establish any of them by such factitious contrivance. This then is now become not so much the cause of the candidates as it is of the free-holders of this borough; it is indeed the cause of the constitution. And will the friend and agent of Colonel Jolliffe, the worthy Recorder of our borough, who has always been one of the most ardent advocates for the rights of the people, who has attended all our county meetings, at which Lord Cochrane, Mr. Cobbett, and Mr. Hunt have taken the lead, and most warmly supported their measures. Will this gentleman desert the ranks of his old friends, and from being “one of us,” put himself in array against the cause of his country? No, my brother freeholders, it cannot be! As an honest man, firm to his own principles, his heart cannot but be with us. But whether we are thus deserted or not, the question, without animosity or ill-will amongst any of us, should be fairly brought to issue and put to rest. If it be consistent with the Law, and the Constitution, and of Parliament too, that Colonel Jolliffe should have the borough in this way, as he holds any private property of his own, the freeholders must passively submit. Our failure will be in the cause of independence and of the country, and it will be glorious for us to have entered the lists which we shall retire from, with the mingle regret and applause of every subject throughout the Realm who values the enjoyment of that rational liberty which forms the best security to, as well as the basis of all the gradations of society, which both reverences the higher ranks, and duly estimates the importance of the middle and lower, combining, as they all do, to promote the best order and happiness of the whole. But now is the time, our rights as freeholders of this borough will be restored, or for ever lost.
  Mr. MINCHIN, born amongst us, and whose principles and character we all well know, and as highly esteem his merits, is the object of our choice, and has acquiesced in our wish to come forward as a candidate for our representation, and to assert our rights; we owe it therefore to ourselves, to our posterity, and to the country whose eye is upon us, to rally round him, and with one heart and one voice support him and the independence of our borough.

A BROTHER FREEHOLDER.  

Petersfield, March 23, 1818.

 * The Mayor is the brother of Mr. Jolliffe, and in his official situation returning officer of the borough.



30-Mar-1818
Hampshire Telegraph
To the Independent Freeholders of Petersfield.
  GENTLEMEN,
  YOU have for forty-three years past been deprived of your privilege of chusing both your Representatives in Parliament, and in this enlightened age, in a Country boasting of Liberty and Justice, you, whose Rights have existed since the Reign of Edward the First, have had those Rights bought and sold at the will of another, and sometimes without one of your Representatives ever attending any Election, or being seed in your Town, and most of them not being even personally known to one of you.
  It remains, therefore, for you to Reform this abuse, and by your united exertions, to Emancipate yourselves,—You have, at length, felt it your duty no longer to submit to your Privileges being thus Sacrificed at the Shrine of Avarice.
  Let every Elector be true to his own Rights, and not a doubt can be entertained that you will replace the Borough in the state in which it was prior to the last Contest for your Representation, in the year 1775; and the Illegal and Unconstitutional means which since that period have been used to wrest them from you, must vanish when controverted. Every Friend to Liberty and the Constitution of his Country will rejoice in your success.
  Many respectable Individuals of your Independent Body having done me the honour to request me to become A CANDIDATE for the REPRESENTATION of the BOROUGH, in the event of a DISSOLUTION of PARLIAMENT, and that I should assist them in asserting and maintaining their Right to chuse for them-selves their own Representatives, by their free and independent Suffrage; it would be an unworthy return in me to reject so gratifying an expression of their esteem and confidence.
  It is not to oppose Mr. JOLLIFFE, one of your present Members, and the Lord of your Manor, as one of your Representatives at the next Election, but, that his Colleague should be the object of your own free and independent choice, returned by yourselves and not by him; and that you should discountenance the canvas he is at this moment making for himself and his friend, whose name he does not even mention to you, but would influence you to chuse without your knowing either the manor his principles.
  I can only now add, that should I be eventually distinguished by so high an honor, I pledge myself to you and to the country, faithfully to discharge the important duties confided to me, upon strictly Constitutional and Independent principles.
  I have the honor to remain, with the greatest respect,
Gentlemen,
Your most obedient humble Servant,

THOMAS ANDREWS MINCHIN.  

THE GROVE, near GOSPORT, March 21, 1818.

HINTS TO ELECTORS.
  The Emissaries of Corruption are beginning their DIRTY WORK. They already summon to their and their hacknied and tried confederates—Falsehood and Misrepresentation. Trembling at every step that tends to the overthrow of a system which has too long preyed on the Vital Interests of the County, they have taken the alarm.
  Unused and unequal to the weapons of Truth and Reason, they prowl about in the dark, scattering the Filth and dealing out Slander with unsparing hand. They have recourse to the old and unprincipled manœvre, of attempting to distort the motives, and undervalue the Conduct, the Talents, and the Reputation of those who have sufficient firmness and Patriotism to come forward and oppose them at the present crisis, and, by oblique insinuation, convey the grossest falsehoods as to the circumstances under which they present themselves to your notice.
  The veil of despairing and disappointed Ambition is easily seen through; but let the Friends of Independence and the Constitution persevere.
  Let those to whom the Elective Franchise of this Country is entrusted, exercise their unbiased reason—The hour is at hand when the Eyes of that Country will be upon them; let them awaken to the dangers which encompass it, and to a sense of the deep Distress under which it labours. With them it rests ?????, if it can be, at ????????? the condition of things, steady and unmoved “through evil report and good report,” and, scorning towards any one a resort to unworthy means, let them keep on the even tenor of their way. Magna est veritus et Prevalebit.

ACHILLES.   

PETERSFIELD, March



20-Apr-1818
Hampshire Chronicle
To the WORTHY ELECTORS of Petersfield.
  GENTLEMEN,
  BY Electors I mean Freeholders; for no one has a right to vote for a Representative of your Borough, but a person possessing an ancient freehold. Allow me to add, an Election is an appeal to the People; and, if those, who have already represented them in the Great Council of the nation, have not given satisfaction, they have a right to change them for others. That Petersfield ought to be represented is not questioned. But, it has been said, that there is a necessity for “ reforming abuses;” for that the Rights and Immunities of your Borough have been lost, not by disuse or abuse, but by the contrivance of the Mayors and Lords of the Manor. I have refuted this, by shewing such Rights and Immunities never existed. A question has been made of my positions, and a most able and intelligent reply has appeared. The writer argues well; but, I am sure, he knows, that Logic defends Error by the same rules it supports Truth. And, that, if the premises are not right, the Conclusions must be wrong. The subject in debate, is, whether Petersfield, as a Borough, is a Borough Corporate, or has only the naked privilege of sending Members to Parliament; in which latter case, it is a Borough not corporate.—My learned Opponent contends for the former position. That we may see the full force of his ingenious argument, I will put it in the Syllogistic form, used in logical disputations, in the Public Schools of our Universities:
  Petersfield is a Borough;
  All Boroughs are corporate;
  Therefore Petersfield is a corporate Borough.
  Here the answer must be negatur major and with success; for the major proposition, all Boroughs are corporate, cannot be defended. If my learned friend, who has replied to me, can allow time, from his more important avocations, to look into the History and Antiquities of Corporations and Boroughs, he will find them all Royal Grants, greatly depending on the Will and Pleasure of the reigning Prince; and, partly, on place, time, and circumstances. Of Corporations, there are Cities, having a Bishop; and, of these, some have the liberties and Jurisdictions peculiar to a County, as London, York, and others: others only Corporations, as Winchester. Of Boroughs, some are corporate; others not corporate. Of this last denomination is Petersfield. This is evident from the Charter: for the Charter of Queen Elizabeth knows no description of persons, but—“the Mayor and Communality of Petersfield.” Besides, there is no Common Seal essential to a Corporation, to identify its Corporate Acts. It is said, and said truly, that there are those now that are called Aldermen; but they are quite nominal; and, being unknown to the Charter, and the Charter existing, at least, a knowledge of its particulars, they cannot be Aldermen by prescription. They have no Commission to perform any Duties; therefore, they have no Duties to perform. Hence I conclude, Petersfield is not a Corporation, but a Borough only, and so called because it sends Burgesses to Parliament—the only privilege it possesses. From all which it follows, that no Blame is imputable to the Mayors or Lords of the Manor; and, that the Plea of reforming Abuses, is not founded. I believe, and I have been present at many returns of Members, that the Freedom and Purity of Election have always been held sacred in the Town-hall of Petersfield. I have always professed a great Friendship for the Town; and I can bring good proof of my sincerity. But, as a Man, clothed with the frailties of Mortality, I may be sometimes mistaken in the means I use. But, this I am quite certain of, I intend your welfare; and have the honour to be,
GENTLEMEN,
Your sincere Friend,
April
15, 1818.     AN ELECTOR.

20-Apr-1818
Hampshire Chronicle
PETERSFIELD, HANTS.
  TO be LET, and entered on at Michaelmas next,—A most desirable FARM, situate at Liss, near Petersfield, known by the name of REED’s FARM; consisting of a house, barn, stables, &c. amd 106 acres of good stock land, within a ring fence, well divided by live fences, with a right of common adjoining the land, now in the occupation of Mr. Greetham.
  To view, apply on the Premises; and to treat, application to be made to Mr. Goodman, Land-Surveyor, Winchester (if by letter, free of postage).


27-Apr-1818
Hampshire Chronicle
To the WORTHY FREEHOLDERS of Petersfield.
  WITH pleasure I re-enter the lists with your learned Correspondent “ELECTOR,’ regretting only that where so much candour and so little asperity are evinced, we should not be able to identify ourselves in a personal acquaintance, which, centered in a regard for your town and its welfare, could not fail of producing a cordial esteem. The points in discussion between us lie in a narrow compass, while the ingenuity displayed by ELECTOR, blended with his pertinacious adherence to the support of those practices which have robbed us of our greatest Privilege, is truly remarkable. He himself appears perfect master of that logic which defends errors by the same rules as it defends truth. He is, doubtless, a veteran in the ranks of that system of which we complain; and as soldiers who are true and staunch, once enlisted, feel themselves bound to fight under the banners, without enquiring into the views or principles of their leaders, and the causes and effects pf their movements, so ELECTOR steadily maintains his place in the ranks of his general. Of such an one, while we applaud the firmness and the courage, we deeply deplore the mistaken, misdirected zeal, which can unblushingly adhere to a cause having neither justice nor right to support it, but which directly tends to overthrow and trample upon everything that is valuable and sacred to man.
  ELECTOR, however, yields to me the grand fundamental point for which I am contending. He says, in express terms, that “as Freeholders only we have a right to vote for a Representative of our borough; that an election is an appeal to the people; and that if those who have already represented them in the great council, THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO CHANGE THEM FOR OTHERS, AND THAT PETERSFIELD OUGHT TO BE REPRESENTED IS NOT QUESTIONED.” In admitting this he acknowledges every thing. This is the great prize for which we are at issue; all other privileges are of minor importance. Whether Petersfield is a Corporation or a Borough only, and whether the Mayor retains only a shew of authority with the bare name of the office, are points of utter insignificance compared with the weighty and momentous question of our right of Representation, which, if once restored to us, every other would soon assume its legitimate and proper shape, and become actively exercised for the benefit of the town and the community.
  With all deference to the learning, abilities, and ingenuity of the worthy ELECTOR, he appears to have strayed into a labyrinth, without knowing which way to turn or how to extricate himself. Whilst he fully admits the chief point we are contending for, he nevertheless appears anxious to obscure such admission by involving it in shades of distinction without a difference. If, advertising to the natural and only use every where made of Corporate Bodies for the purpose of judicial authority, I have been in any respect incorrect in urging what ought to be our rights and privileges as a Corporation, under the name of Mayor and Commonalty, which he does not deny to belong to us; why does not ELECTOR give us the very words of Queen Elizabeth’s Charter, since the question is best traced from its source? I agree with ELECTOR, that “Corporations and Boroughs are all created by Royal grants, depending on the will and pleasure of the reigning Prince who grants them, and partly of course on the place, time, and circumstances o the grant.” The production then of this Charter would be the best refutation of any erroneous position, which either of us may have adopted. But without going into ELECTOR’s ingenious subtleties of distinction, respecting boroughs and cities, and whether boroughs are corporate, and therefore Petersfield must be a Corporate borough—without resorting to the aid of syllogisms—without the toil od searching amongst dusty records of the history and antiquities of Corporations and Boroughs—I would recommend ELECTOR to refer to the GOOD OLD BOOK, entitled “THE CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND,” the pages of which are bound together by the concentrated wisdom of ages, cemented by the blood of our forefathers, and consecrated, by their virtuous, noble, and steady adherence to the cause of rational and ??licentious liberty, as the best security at once of the Crown’s prerogative and of the subject’s rights. The first leaf in this book bears the title of “MAGNA CHARTA,” and the most prominent lines in its page are the following words—“No freeman shall be disseised of his freehold or liberties, or his free customs may otherwise be destroyed, but by the lawful judgement of his Peers, or by the law of the land.” And to it is added the guarantee of King Henry the Third, confirmed as the Charter was afterwards by King Edward the First, each for himself and his successors, King of England, that “We will sell no man, nor deny or defer to any man either justice or right.” Let ELECTOR then pause for a moment only, and ask himself whether we are not virtually and in fact disseised of our freehold by being robbed of the best right attached to it—and whether justice and right are not sold by the disgraceful practice which has so long prevailed in our borough.
  If the sending burgesses to Parliament be (as ELECTOR says) the only privilege which we possess, is it consistent with the Constitution and with Magna Charta that we should be deprived of that most invaluable of all privileges, by the contrivances of art and chicanery? by forms of law, in a mere transcript of words on parchment, pretending to convey Freeholds to others, for the only purpose of voting, but without any actual and bona fide sale and proprietorship of the property in the individual voting? and whether the power, and influence, and aggrandisement of wealth of oneindividual Freeholder above all the others ought to usurp the rights of all, regardless of their free suffrage in so important an instance as that of sending Representatives to the great Council of the Nation? And how van ELECTOR so far eclipse the good sense and candour which he possesses, as to assert, that “the freedom and purity of Election have always been held sacred in the Town-hall of Petersfield,” when he cannot deny, that since the period of 1775 at least, if not before, the Mr. Jolliffe for the time being has always exclusively sent whom he chose as one of the Representatives of the borough, while he himself has been the other? That he should be one of our Representatives no Freeholder ever thought of objecting; but that the other sent should be sold to any individual who would give most money for it, despising the free choice of the Freeholders, we must decidedly protest against.
  However much all may lament that the Mr. Jolliffes should for so many years have wholly deserted the town as a residence, every one was inclined, from respect due to them as the larger proprietors, that they should have one of its seats in Parliament—but if from courtesy this has heretofore been yielded, it is too much to wrest from us all the right and privilege which the Crown and the Constitution have vested in the Freeholders of our borough, as a part of the Commons of Great Britain, to send Representatives to Parliament on behalf of themselves and the whole people of England. IT IS FOR THE PEOPLE, of which we are part, that this right should be exercised, and it is our duty to our country thus to seek to recover it.
  Whatever may be the issue, we shall at least merit the encomium which an ancestor of Mr. Jolliffe’s, friend to liberty and to the glorious Revolution which brought the present House of Hanover to the Throne, and an ardent asserter of the rights of the people, has inscribed on the pedestal of the monument to King William, in your Market-place, viz. HE DESERVED WELL OF HIS COUNTRY. Let Mr. Jolliffe look back to that great period of our history; let him imitate the example of his illustrious fore-father, and now support the rights and liberties of the subject, and thereby himself deserve well of his country. We should hail him with reverence; and besides the sacred pleasure which he would experience in the repose of mind and conscience which must result from a faithful and honourable discharge of his duty in society, he would have the blessings and share in the felicities of all those who would have real satisfaction in uniting with him in the desire of promoting the real good, the highest interests of our country in general, and of the borough in particular.  A FREEHOLDER.
Petersfield, April 23, 1818.

11-May-1818
Hampshire Chronicle

  The following are the PREMIUMS to be offered at the PETERSFIELD AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY, for the year 1818, which will be held on Thursday the 23d of July next :—
  …\3d.—A Piece of Plate, value 5 guineas, given by Thomas Bonham, Esq. of Petersfield, for the best Pen of ten South Down Ewes, three years old.

11-May-1818
Hampshire Telegraph
FROXFIELD.—HANTS.
  TO be Peremptorily SOLD by AUCTION, by order of the Assignee of the Estate and Effects of JOHN THARP, formerly of Froxfield, near to Petersfield, in the County of Hants, and late of Colemore, near to the same place, Husbandman, and last a Prisoner of Debt in the Fleet Prison, by Mr. JOHN CAWLEY, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Thursday the 28th day of May, 1818, between the hours of four and six o’clock in the afternoon,—One MOIETY or equal HALF PART of and in a very desirable COPYHOLD ESTATE, consisting of about 24 Acres, more or less, of Arable and Wood Land, formerly in the occupation of the said John Tharp, afterwards of his brother, William Tharp, and now of the Rev. Mr. Cookson,—The above Premises are Copyhold of Inheritance, under the Bishop of Winchester, at a small Quit Rent, and are nearly equal in Freehold.
  The Timber and Underwoods to be taken at a valuation.—Possession may be had at Old Michaelmas next; if required.
  For further particulars apply, if by letter, post-paid, to Messrs. Hector and Mitchell, Solicitors, Petersfield.

18-May-1818
Hampshire Telegraph

  Died, a few days since, Mrs. Port, wife of Mr. Benj. Port, Yeoman, of Sheet, near Petersfield.


21-Jun-1818
Bell's Weekly Messenger
MEMBERS RETURNED
  Petersfield—Mr. Jolliffe and Mr. Canning.

18-Jul-1818
Morning Post

NEW PARLIAMENT
HOUSE OF COMMONS
A LIST OF THE MEMBERS RETURNED
TO SERVE IN THE NEW PARLIAMENT FOR THE SEVERAL COUNTIES, CITIES, BOROUGHS, &c. IN ENGLAND AND WALES, ALPHABETICALLY ARRANGED.

  **** Those printed in Italics were not in the last Parliament.— Those marked thus (*) are new, for their respective places. Those marked thus (¶) are returned for more than one place.
ENGLAND AND WALES
  Petersfield ……………. Hylton Joliffe, Geo. Canning.

23-Jul-1818
Perthshire Courier

  GENERAL ELECTION.—It is expected that there will be a greater number of petitions for undue returns to the next Parliament than for many years back. The following places, amongst others, are mentioned :—Nottingham, Hythe, Petersfield, Grampound, Wootton Bassett, Colchester, Ipswich, Edinburgh, several of the Cornish boroughs, and many places in Ireland.


27-Jul-1818
Hampshire Telegraph

  PETERSFIELD AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY.—The Annual Meeting of this Society was held at Petersfield on Thursday last, when a great variety of Sheep, Cattles, and Pigs were exhibited, in a field adjoin the town. A large assemblage of the neighbouring gentry and farmers took place on the occasion, who were much gratified at the great improvement that appeared to have taken place in the Stock, since the last annual meeting. … The Chairman very handsomely announced the intention of himself, Mr. Bonham, Mr. Scott, and others, to continue their several donations of silver cups for the ensuing year.


15-Aug-1818
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser
EXECUTION OF CHENNEL AND CHALCRAFT.
  G. Chennel, and W. Chalcraft, were executed yesterday morning, pursuant to their sentences, at a quarter past eleven, upon a temporary gallows, erected in Godalming Meadows. The culprits, since their conviction, have evinced uncommon apathy. Two Clergymen visited them the night they were convicted, and prayed with them a considerable time. Chennel remained during the whole time in a torpid state, and wished to avoid conversing with any one, especially upon the subject of the murders. During Wednesday night, Chennell slept seven hours, and seemed much composed. Chalcraft was feverish and uneasy, but slept sound for several hours. On Thursday, the Rev. Mr. Mann, the Ordinary of Horsemonger-lane Gaol; visited them, and remained with them a considerable time, entreating them, as the only reparation they could make to society, to relieve the minds of the people, by acknowledging their guilt of the murder for which they were so soon to suffer; and also, if they were guilty of the other murders at Petersfield, Farnham, and Reading, of which they were so strongly suspected. The culprits declared in the most positive terms (particularly Chalcraft) that they were “innocent as the child unborn of the murders of Mr. Chennel and Mary Wilson.”
  On Thursday evening, the wife of G. Chennel, visited him with her child, a fine lad of about six years of age. The moment Chennel saw them he burst into tears, and embraced her most affectionately. They were left together in the cell for about 20 minutes, and when they parted, his wife was in a dreadful state of anguish; he did not seem to feel so much as when they met. He persisted to his wife that he was innocent of the crime for which he was to die. In a short time after a more afflicting scene took place, Chalcraft’s wife and six children presented themselves at the gaol door to take a last leave of the husband and father. The interview was overpowering to the spectators—such real distress and misery cannot be depicted. The agonizing shrieks of the mother, the heavy groans of the father, and the cries of the children, would have pierced any heart.—“Oh! My dear Will, tell me the truth; as a man who stands before God, and is going to die, if you are guilty of the murder pray, for God’s sake, don’t hide any thing, and have the weight of guilt upon your conscience when you are dying.” Chalcraft replied—“My dear, I am innocent of the murder, or I would confess it.”
  Mrs. C. said to him, that she had been upbraided by her neighbours with washing the bloody cloaths; and you know; and God knows, that I never did.—Chalcraft answered, “They are cruel to you; I never did the murder, or had any hand in it, and you never saw any bloody cloaths.”—Chalcraft then admitted that he was at old Mr. Chennel’s on the night preceding the discovery of the murder, from a quarter past nine; but he still persisted that he had no knowledge of the murder.—Mrs. C. was about to leave the cell, when she presented the babe she held in her hand to Chalcraft to kiss; she then exclaimed, “Oh, God! To-morrow this child id just 12 months old, and your father then is to die. I hope God will be a father to my children.” They then embraced, and were separated by the gaolers.—Chennel asked the Rev. Mr. Mann, when he left him on Thursday night, to be kind enough to visit him as early as he could on the following morning. The Rev. Gentleman was with the criminals yesterday morning at six o’clock. Mr. Mann continued praying and reading hymns to them until half-past eight o’clock; they still persisted they were not guilty. Mr. Mann hesitated for a considerable time before he would administer the Sacrament to them. After some time spent in protestations of their innocence, the worthy Divine cautioned them in the most feeling and religious language, not to take sin to their souls by partaking of so divine an ordinance with a lie in their mouths. They continued to declare their innocence; and, after the Sacrament was administered, they were bound by ropes in the usual manner, and, at about half-past nine o’clock, they were led to the prison-door, and placed in a waggon, upon which was erected a platform, which they were to be launched from under the gallows. The procession from Guildford to Godalming, which is a distance of about four miles, was composed of Constables, Javelin Men, Under Sheriff, &c. In the waggon and platform were the criminals, sitting with their faces towards the horses. The Rev. Mr. Mann sat between them, reading prayers and hymns. The executioner sat facing them, with a naked sword in his hand. The Rev. Mr. West, of Stoke, sat on the right hand of the executioner, occasionally administering consolation to the criminals.—When the procession began to move Chennel once changed colour, but he soon became composed, and did not move a muscle during the remainder of the way; he was totally unaffected by the surrounding multitude; he kept his eyes fixed upon the platform all the time, until the moment he arrived under the gallows. Chalcraft, during the whole of the time, responded to the prayers of the Clergymen, and seemed sensibly affected with his awful situation. The procession arrived on the fatal spot about 11 o’clock; which is surrounded by hills, and thousands has assembled. When the platform was placed under the gallows, the Executioner asked Chennell to mount upon it, he sprung up with surprising vigour and boldness, and stood erect and firm, during the time the Executioner tied the rope round his neck. During that time a Gentleman, for whom Chalcraft had worked, was in deep conversation with him; Chalcraft had promised him (his own words) to “tell him the whole pedigree of the affair when he came to the place of execution.” The Gentleman intreated him to fulfil his promise; Chalcraft trembled very much, but recovering himself, he again protested his innocence of the murder.
  When the procession was on the road, Mr. Mann earnestly intreated Chennel to make a confession, and told him that he had no right to expect mercy, unless he acknowledged his crimes, if it was only for the purpose of preventing innocent persons from suffering for the crimes which they had committed. He then put the question to Chennel in the most solemn manner, “Did you or did you not commit the murder, or assist at all in it?” Chennel lifted up his eyes, and said, in reply, “I never had any concern in the murder.” Chalcraft turned his head round, and looking at him very expressly, answered, “You did, George; you know you did!” When Chalcraft was desired to ascend the scaffold, he trembled very much, and looked anxiously around. It was thought he would have made a confession, but he only shook hands with a gentleman, and again repeated his asseveration of innocence. He then mounted the scaffold, and the rope being adjusted round his neck, the Rev. Mr. Mann ascended also, and held a conversation with them; he said, that they were now on the very verge of the grave, but it was not too late to make a full confession; and he earnestly entreated them, if they, as dying men, had any regard for their souls, not to die denying the truth. Chennel replied, “What I have asserted is the truth.” These were his last words.—Chalcraft was deeply engaged in prayer, and made no answer. Mr. Mann then prayed with them, and having left the fatal apparatus, they were launched into eternity. Chennel was a great deal convulsed, Chalcraft died almost instantly. After hanging an hour they were cut down, and their bodies given to Mr. Parsons, surgeon, at Godalming, for dissection. The anxiety of the Public was great; it was hoped they would have made a confession of their participation in the murders of a young man, named Searson, near Petersfield; of a Mr. Stilwell, who lived in Holt forest, near Farnham; and of a Roman Catholic Priest, who was murdered at Reading. It is a fact that Chennel and Chacraft were at each of the above places at the time the murders were committed; and in one case (the murder at Petersfield) very strong evidence has been adduced against them, and if they had not been found guilty upon the charge for which they suffered, they would have been tried upon that charge at the next assizes.

17-Aug-1818
Hampshire Chronicle

  T. P. Phipps, Esq. of Little Green, near Petersfield, has made a benefaction of £100 to our Infirmary. Henry Baring, Esq. of Somerly House, has also transmitted a donation of £10 in aid of the same institution.


20-Aug-1818
Worcester Journal
GUILDFORD ASSIZES.
Horrid Murder and Parricide
  On Wednesday morning all the avenues to the Court were filled, so great was the interest excited by the trial of G. Chennel and J. Chalcraft, indicted for the wilful murder, at Godalming, on the evening of the 10th November last, of Mr. Chennel, sen. and Eliz. Wilson, his housekeeper.
  Mr. Gurney, in stating the case to the Jury, said, that even the horrid crime of murder had its gradations of atrocity. It was aggravated when committed by the strong upon the feeble—when by servant against master—and above all—when by the son against his aged father. The deceased, Mr. Chennel, was a respectable tradesman at Godalming, and a man of considerable property. The prisoner Chennel was his son, and the other prisoner his carman, and had been so for many years, he having a little farm in addition to his trade of a currier. Eliz. Wilson, the other person murdered, was a harmless old woman, who had been also for many years his housekeeper.
  A variety of witnesses were examined, who testified to a variety of minute particulars which tended to fix the murders on the prisoners; among the witnesses was Sarah Hurst, who stated herself to have been an accomplice, and gave a very straight-forward account of the horrid deed; Mr. Sergeant Lens, however, in his address to the Jury, did not appear to believe her. The evidence for the prosecution being closed, the prisoners gave some account of themselves on the day the murders were committed, which in no material degree affected the case of either; after which, the Judge (Mr. Sergeant Lens) proceeded to sum up the evidence. The jury almost immediately returned a verdict of Guilty against both prisoners. Very little change was observed in the appearance or countenance either of Chalcraft or Chennel when the verdict was pronounced. The learned Judge then proceeded to pass the awful sentence of the law, apparently much affected. He told the prisoners they had been found guilty by a jury of their country-men, after the most mature and patient investigation of the case; and he might now mention what he had studiously abstained from hinting before, that he thought the conclusion they had come to the only one to which any reasonable man could come on the evidence against them. After the long examination into which the Court had already entered, he felt that he could not much longer make a demand on their attention, but he could not omit stating to the prisoners the situation in which they stood with regard to the deceased. The one of them stood in the relation of a son—a relation which should always create the utmost reverence and love; the other in that of a servant, which should always command duty and respect. Murder committed in these relation could scarcely admit of aggravation, but the crime in their case had been aggravated by circumstances of almost unexampled atrocity. The one had lifted up his hand not only against his father, but that father aged and feeble; and the other against a master whom he himself had denominated kind and benevolent. If they had not yet prepared their minds by repentance to supplicate that God whom they had offended, they should employ the few hours that yet remained for that purpose, without uselessly denying their guilt, and endeavour to place their souls in a state to receive pardon in another world for a deed like this. He had now only to pronounce the awful sentence of the law, which was, that they be taken hence to the prison from whence they came, and on Friday next carried to the place of execution, there to be hung by the neck till dead, and their bodies to be anatomised and dissected according to the statute. This being the sentence of the law, the Lord have mercy on their souls. The prisoners were then led away, Chalcraft protesting that he was “as innocent as the child unborn,” and Chennel saying nothing. The latter seems a person about 40; he is a stout made man, rather inclined to be corpulent, with the outline of a good face, apparently rendered heavy and dull by the effects of indolence and irregular habits. He was dressed in a black jockey coat, a striped waistcoat, and a black neckerchief. He displayed, on his entrance into Court, the utmost indifference to his situation, and did not appear to be much touched by any thing that occurred.—The trail began a few minutes after eight in the morning, and lasted till nine in the evening.
  In the afternoon of Thursday the wife and child of Chennell visited him at his own request, as did the wife and six children of Chalcraft; the wife of the latter urged him to confess, if he was guilt—he replied by asserting his innocence. Yesterday morning, after the sacraments had been administered to the unhappy men, a clergyman urged them to confess, but still they refused; Chennel saying that whatever crimes he might have committed, he was not guilty of that for which he was about to suffer; and Chalcraft echoing the words without variation. At nine o’clock the wretched culprits were placed in a caravan, and arrived at the place of execution about eleven. Here the crowd was greater than it was imagined would have been collected on such an occasion. The gallows was erected on an extensive meadow to the north of Godalming, which, together with the neighbouring heights, was covered with people of all conditions: the meadow was within sight of Chennel’s farm. Every endeavour to induce a confession proving fruitless, an officer, who knew Chalcraft, and to whom he said, that on arriving at the place of execution, he would “tell the whole pedigree of it,” now went up, and asked if he was ready to perform his promise, and make confession? He again refused, and protested his innocence. Chennel appeared utterly indifferent to his situation, but Chalcraft was much agitated. No appearance of a design to confess being manifested, the platform was drawn from under them, and they were launched into eternity. After hanging an hour, the bodies were cut down, taken into Godalming, and drawn up the street in which the murders had been perpetrated. The caravan stopped before the residence of the late Mr. Chennel, where, after a pause of some moments, the bodies were taken from the vehicle, carried into the house, and delivered to the surgeons for dissection.
  Thus these two great criminals suffered the penalty of their offences near the spot where the most atrocious part of them was committed. We say a part because there is now great reason to suspect that they were concerned in the murder of a sailor at Petersfield and also in the murder of an old man who lived in a lone house near Farnham.—Chennel appears to have been an instance of the melancholy effects of indulgence, for we learn that his father repeatedly rescued him from dilemmas into which his crimes had brought him, and had injured his property by these acts of parental tenderness to an only child!
  [One account says, “Mr. Mann put the question direct to Chennel in the most solemn manner, “Mr Did you, or did you not, commit the murder, or assist at all in it?”—Chennel lifted up his eyes, and said, in reply, “I never had any concern in the murder.” Chalcraft turned his head round, and looking at him very expressively answered, “You did, George, you know you did.””]

20-Aug-1818
Perthshire Courier
GILFORD, AUGUST 12.
THE KING V. CHENNEL AND CHALCRAFT
  At a very early hour this morning the Court, and all the avenues leading to it were filled up, so great was the public anxiety to hear the trial of these prisoners.
  AT eight o’clock Mr. Serjeant Lens proceeded to the Court, when the prisoners, George Chennel and J. Chalcraft, were arraigned for the wilful murder of G. Chennel, at Godalming, on the 10th of November last; and on a second indictment, for the murder of Elizabeth Wilson, by fracturing their skulls with a hammer, and cutting their throats.
  Mr. Gurney, as leading Counsel for the Crown, stated the case to the Jury, in an admirable speech. In his preliminary observations, he said, that even the horrid crime of murder had its gradations of atrocity. It was aggravated when committed by the strong upon the feeble and unresisting—when by the servant against his master—and above all, when by the son against his aged father. The last was the dreadful charge which was imputed to the prisoners—the one was the son, and the other the servant of the deceased. He mentioned this not to excite their passions; on the contrary they must not suffer themselves to be transported by their indignation at the crime, to be caused, by a premature judgement, to pronounce the accused guilty. They must discharge from their minds all they had heard elsewhere, and found their verdict only upon evidence which should be adduced before them, for upon that alone they had sworn to found their verdict. With respect to that evidence, from which they must form the result of their opinion, it must of necessity be collected from a variety of circumstances, all tending to the same end—The murderer did not do his foul deed in the presence of witnesses. He chose night and solitude for the perpetration of his crime. The deceased, Mr. Chennel was a respectable tradesman at Godalming near this place, and was also a man of considerable property. The prisoner Chennel was his son, and the other prisoner his carman, and had been so for many years, he having a little farm in addition to his trade of a currier.—Elizabeth Wilson, the other person murdered, was harmless old woman, who had been also for many years his house-keeper. The prisoner Chennel lodged in the town of Godalming, and usually took his meals at his father’s, but did not lodge there, and it would be proved, had not that filial affection which ??????? ought to have for a father. On the morning of Thursday, the 10th November last, about seven o’clock, the town of Godalming, was ????? with the account that Mr. Chennel and his housekeeper were both found murdered, at their house, which was in the middle of the street at Godalming; the old ???? in his bed, and the housekeeper in ??? ??? ??? front kitchen. They were last seen ???? o’clock on the Monday evening, and ????? the murder must have been committed ???? ten. The old gentleman was a ver??? Went to bed usually at nine; his housekeeper ??? him for some time, and usually retired to ???? was found in his bed, and therefore it was done after he had retired; she was found in the kitchen, where she had been at work, not having been to bed, and the work, which lay near her, was a shirt of the prisoner’s, which she was mending. It was, therefore presumed that it was before her usual time of going to bed. The person who lives in the next house, and whose bed room adjoined to Mr. Chennel’s, went to bed at ten o’clock and could hear any thing that passed in his????? to not hear any noise after that hour. ?? in addition ???????, a person was passing the house about half-past ????, and heard a scream, and afterwards something ????????? did not suspect the dreadful deed which was the????? Probably in perpetration. The next morning, ???? farming servant of Mr. Chennel’s came to the s????? for the horses at about six, he found Chalcraft there, ?????, and it was the conduct of Chalcraft that excited suspicion against him. They dressed their horses, and ?????? the house where usually the old gentleman and his housekeeper would be sitting at that hour. The ??? was open, but no one appeared; at length Chalcraft ?????? the front kitchen, and the other heard him calling his master, but no answer. Now it would be proved, that the murdered body of the housekeeper laid in such a position that when he opened the door, he must have ???????? must have stepped over it to get to ?????? and the???? His affecting not to see ????????? great suspicion. In addition to this, w?????? given, he stated that his master was n??????? before he, or any one had been up stair????to be the constant companion of the ????????????, and therefore he was immediately ????????? searching for the box of Chennel ??????????? found, one of them slightly ???????? notes would be traced to the possession ??????????? days before. The prisoner at once ????????????? notes had been his father’s, and said ????????????? gave them to him on the preceding Sunday; ????????????? to prove that th????? part of Monday, could not pay ??????? ten o’clock on Monday evening, after ??????? supposed to be commuted he went ????????? Arms, in that town, and squandered ???????? ???sely. As they were ??? suspected, ???? to say where they had been, and when ?????gether on the Monday evening ?????? they had not seen each other since the??? The falsity of this statement would be ??? for both Chalcraft and Chennel were ???? half past nine on the evening of the ????? was seen standing at the very passage ??? deceased’s house, and a witness afterwards ??? a woman walking backward and forward ??? apparently on the watch. This woman, ???, was one Sarah Hurst, an accomplice ?? was seen walking towards his home. (long passage illegible)
  John Currington was farming servant to the late Mr. Chennel. He left him on the Monday evening at hal past five. He saw his master about ??? after past seven. He went to the house on Wednesday morning at half past six. He took some horses from a field to the stable. The stables were behind the house. He saw there Chalcraft. He found him in the store-room, just within the door, at half past six. The door was open. Chalcraft had the corn sieve in his hand. Witness had never found that door open before, til his master had risen. His master used to leave the corn in two peck measures at the ??? of the stairs. The key was usually kept within the door of the front kitchen. To get that key it was necessary to enter the kitchen. Witness, after cleaning his horses, went up to the back kitchen to breakfast with George Sweetman. They found the door on the latch. Chalcraft went home to breakfast. When he came back they went to harness the horses. He returned about half past seven. They brought out their horses into the street; no person was up in the house. Witness told Chalcraft that he wanted small beer for breakfast, and told him that the back kitchen door was open. Chalcraft said, how the deuce di that come open? Mr. Milliner the shoemaker, rattled at the front door to awaken his master; then Chalcraft and witness went down the passage, went through the cellar, and called his master three or four times. Witness heard the door of the kitchen rattle; was not sure if it was the door of the kitchen. After having called, Chalcraft came back the way he went, through the cellar. Prisoner afterwards rapped the window in front with his whip at the chamber where Mr. Channel slept. Witness did not then know that his master slept there, but now knows. Chalcraft returned down the passage again, and unlatched the kitchen door, when witness or prisoner found a puddle of blood by putting down his hand. Prisoner then shove the door to. Witness mentioned to the prisoner that it was blood. They went up the passage as fast as they could, and gave the alarm. Chalcraft asked whom he should call. Chalcraft met Mr. Earl, who came to the house. People then collected.
  Examined by the Judge—Witness said, that when he observed that it was blood, by dipping his finger in the puddle, Chalcraft made no reply. The prisoner being asked if he had any questions to put to the witness, replied no. Charlotte Haynes keeps the Little George, in Godalming. Her house is next Mr. Chennel’s; her sleeping room is next Mr. Chennel’s, divided from it by a very thin wall, whether brick or not she does not know. She knew the room to be Mr. Chennels bed room. She could hear Mr. Chennel cough in going to bed or getting up, or likewise draw the curtain. He usually went to bed about nine, or a little after, in winter. She recollected the night of the murder. Witness had gone to bed about ten minutes before ten o’clock. She was very poorly and wished to go to bed, and she therefore shut the doors, which made her observe the time. She did not go to sleep till before eleven, when her daughter came to bed. All was quiet in Mr. Chennel’s room. She did not hear him go to bed. She heard what had happened on Tuesday morning about half past seven. She heard it after she was up, and went out. She then saw Chalcraft standing at Harris the butcher’s door. He was saying nothing, but standing with his right hand on the door. Prisoner looked very hard at her across the street. Witness saw Mr. Milliner standing at Mr. Chalcraft’s door, and proceeded to him. She then saw the last witness, Currington, coming up the passage. He called out loud, “I think they are both murdered” Witness asked him, for what reason he thought so? And he replied, because there was a great lump of blood in the kitchen as big as his hand. Witness went to the kitchen and saw blood just within the door. Witness returned immediately, and met Chalcraft in the passage, who made a mewling noise, and asked witness if she thought they were murdered? Witness said, she was afraid they were. She then ran up to Mr. Knight’s to give the alarm.
  Examined by the Court.—Witness said she was sure she was not asleep before eleven. Witness usually goes to bed about ten or a little afterwards.
  John Knight, jun. deposed, that on Tuesday, the 11th of November last, he came to Chennel’s passage about half past seven. Chalcraft was there standing at the entrance of the passage from the street. He was facing the other side of the street. Nothing about prisoner’s manner attracted witness’s attention at the time. Witness went to the door of the kitchen, followed by Chalcraft. Having opened the door, he saw the body of the woman lying on the ground. The door could not open completely on account of the body. Chalcraft did not enter, and when witness asked him to go up stairs, he replied he could not go, and seemed very much agitated. Prisoner just looked on, and witness did not go up. Witness left prisoner in the passage. Witness said that he believed that a person in opening the kitchen door to call up stairs must have seen the body. Witness did not observe the dress of the woman.
  Mr. Henry Canston was next door neighbour to Mr. Chennel. Witness is a baker. The back of his premises opens into the yard to which, Mr. Chennel’s passage leads. Witness has a door nearly opposite to Mr. Chennel’s front kitchen, ??? into the passage. On the night of Monday witness went down the passage at a quarter before ten towards the street. He did not go by the kitchen. Every thing was then quiet. He returned and entered his own house at the front door. He then went out of the back door into the passage to the pump for water. His door is nearlt opposite the kitchen window of Mr. Chennel. There was no light in the kitchen then. He must have seen the light, if there had been any, as ??? part of the window was not covered with the shutters. I ???? no person there. Witness then went to bed.—His bed-room is just over Mr. Chennel’s door. There ???? thin partition between the house of the witness and that of the deceased, so that every thing could be ????? Chennel’s house.—His room is against Mrs. Wilson’s bed-room. Witness heard no noise in Mr. Channel’s house ??? as long as remained awake. On Tuesday morning ?????? heard the alarm. About 20 minutes before eighth ??? standing at his front door, and Chalcraft in the ??? of the road, with his arms folded. Prisoner said “My master and Bet are both murdered to-night.” Witness said, “Good God, what do you mean Chalcraft?” He answered, “Bet lies in the kitchen, and master is upstairs.” Witness directly went down the passage, and met ?? Knight at the top, coming from the house. Witness ???? housekeeper lying on the floor of the front kitchen. She had on a light coloured shawl. Her stockings ??? white. She had a white handkerchief about her ???? Witness went and informed his family, and made ???? He returned and found John Earl standing in ???? hen. Witness though the body of Mrs Wilson had been moved a little, as the door could not otherwise ?????; the door of the passage, came against her head ???? first lying. Witness did not take particular ??? of the marks of violence, but observed blows on ??????le. and the hand had nearly been cut off. Witness ????? go up into Mr. Chennel’s chamber. The ????? Chennel did not live in the house with his father ???? frequently had his meals there. Witness lived next door neighbour to Mr. Chennel for 7 years. The prisoner and his father lived on very bad terms. Witness had ??? the prisoner Chennel make use of expressions regarding his father about a month or two before his father’s decease. The expressions conveyed vile names, and he wished he were dead. His language for several years past was so much against his father that witness shuddered at it. The expression of a wish that ???? dead had been used about a year before. His language against the housemaid was violent. He wished ???? her would ???? her out of doors, as she told his ???? was making mischief between them ????? at his father’s on Sunday at one o’clock ???? witness ‘s shop for his farther’s dinner ?????? minutes, and then went away.
  ??????? maker in Godalming, and used to ???? Chennel. He recollected the Monday when ???? took place. He saw Mr. Chennel about a quarter past sevem. Mrs. Wilson was in the back kitchen ????? of the murder about twenty minutes before eight. He was in the street, and saw the prisoner standing in the street with his hand-folded. He said, “For God’s sake, John Earl, come over, we cannot find Master no where, and there is blood in the kitchen.” Witness went, followed by Chalcraft, to the kitchen door, and saw Elizabeth Wilson lying on the floor, with her ???? leaned against the door. Witness ???? Bet murdered, and no doubt master has ?? with the same fate”—Chalcraft went for the constable. Witness then let the shutters down, but could see the body before the window was opened, from the light of the door. Witness did not examine the person of the house-keeper, but saw she had a white handkerchief. Witness, with two or three others, went up stairs, the staircase door being shut. They went into Mr Chennel’s room; saw him in bed, with his throat cut, and blood on the clothes. The body was covered up to the head. Witness then went into the housekeeper’s bed-room. There was no appearance there of the bed being slept in. He then went down, and saw Chennel at the front door of the side kitchen, outside, in the passage. Witness said, “George, a bad job has happened to night; ???? poor Bet, murdered, and your father has met with the same fate in his bed.” Prisoner said, “O dear, what is to be done?” Witness said, “Won’t you go up and see your father?” Prisoner made no reply, but went immediately upstairs, accompanied by witness. As soon as he went into the room, he took one look of his father, and sat down on the left of the room, holding his handkerchief to his face, and making a mournful noise. Witness went down stairs and left prisoner there with the prisoner there with the constable, who had come into the room a little before. On getting down stairs witness was shown a knife all stained with blood. It was the knife of the deceased; witness had often seen and used it before. Witness remained two or three hours about the house; he saw Chalcraft afterwards in the shop, and asked him why he did not go in the house; Mr. Austin had asked the question why he did not go to see his master, and he answered he could not because he had seen the man who was murdered at Petersfield. Witness thought that the door of the front kitchen could not be opened without seeing the housekeeper’s body.
  Richard Stedman went up into Mr. Chennel’s room on the Tuesday morning with the last witness and Austin. He there saw Mr. Chennel lying with his skull fractured and his throat cut. The blood about the wound was dry, and shewed that the murder had been committed some time. He did not turn the clothes down so as to observe if there was blood on the bed. He examined the body of the housekeeper, and found a knife resting against her body, with the point on the brick; the blood was dry on the knife; the apron and handkerchief were bloody but dry. The knife was a large case knife. He remarked the state of the wound on the woman, and it appeared to have been done a considerable time, as the blood was dry. The arm of the woman which witness felt, was cold.
  John Kean is the son of the keeper of the House of Correction at Guildford. On the discovery of the murder he went to Godalming. He examined the premises of Mr. Chennel, and found a hammer covered with blood. He compared the hammer with a wound on Mr. Chennel’s head, and the end appeared to fit one of the marks. Chalcraft was committed to witness’s custody. He had a smock frock on (Wednesday) when he took him. On the Thursday morning when he examined him, he found spots of blood on the right sleeve of the frock. Witness went into the house on Tuesday with Chalcraft and Austin.
  George Austin remembered Tuesday, the 11th Nov. last, and saw Chalcraft when he was looking up to his master’s windows. Witness called him into Chennel’s shop, and asked if he would like to see the bodies, and he said no. Witness asked him why; and he answered, because I never saw but one man murdered, and that was the man at Petersfield. He asked if he saw that man murdered, and he said no, I saw him afterwards. Witness then asked him again to go, remarking that they would do no harm, and he said he would not go for all the town. Prisoner seemed much agitated. Witness turned round him, and perceived a spot, which he considered to be blood, on the right arm. This was before he was taken into custody. On the following day witness went with Kean and Chalcraft to the house of the deceased. Kean asked if he would go and see the bodies, and he said he would, and they all went together. They passed through the shop, Chalcraft stepped over the body, and they went upstairs. Kean then asked if he knew which was his master’s bed room. He answered, no He did not know any more than the child unborn, not being up stairs before. They went in, and Chalcraft said, there he lies, poor old man, one of the best masters I ever had. When going down, witness asked the prisoner to take the position he was in when he called his master in the morning; he took the position, and the witness described his attitude from model—[The description could not be intelligible in words; but the object of the examination went to prove, that in the morning when the prisoner went to call his master, he must have seen the body of the housekeeper, though he had made no mention of it.] Witness asked him, why he did not open the door and pass through to the stairs instead of going round? to which the prisoner answered,—“If you knew the pedigree of it as well as I do, you would have done as I did.” Witness asked Chalcraft, on Wednesday, when in custody, when he saw George last, (meaning Chennel) and he answered, “on Friday last, ploughing” Witness saw G. Chennel on Tuesday night, at his (witness’s) mother’s house, when he said he had left the Richmond Arms on Monday night to go and see a lady; and that he was not gone above four or five minutes; and when he returned his pipe was not out.
  Sarah Hurst appeared deeply affected, and could scarcely stand. She lived in Godalming, and knew the prisoners; saw Chalcraft at five in the evening of Monday, the 10th of November. He asked if she should be down town that evening, and she answered she did not know if she should. He said he wished she would, giving no reason for his wish. She told him she would come down if he wanted her. Nothing more then passed. She saw him again a little after nine over against Mr. Pason’s, or, as near as she could tell, a few doors below Mr. Chennel’s. He was then alone. She asked what he wanted. He answered, that he wanted her to stand by Mr. Chennel’s door to watch. Nothing more then passed. He went to Mr. Chennel’s house, and witness walked in front of the door-way backward and forward. She remained there some time, but could not tell how long. She saw George Chennel going in too when Chalcraft went. After Chalcraft came out, she heard a screech from within doors. Chalcraft said when he came out, “Is that you Hurst?” and she said “Yes” She asked him what they had been doing? He answered, we have done for them both.—Witness saw some blood on his round frock sleeve by the light of two candles in the opposite window. Witness asked how it came there, to which he answered, it was the blood from them two. Chennel came up while they were talking from the passage, and asked who Chalcaraft was talking to. He said he was talking to Hurst. One or two persons passed at this time. They parted—Chalcraft went down the town, and Chennel went up. Witness likewise went up. The nest night she was in company with Chalcraft, and he offered her 4/- to keep it secret at a public house. She told him she would not have it, as she did not want the money. He spoke in whispers. This happened in the Angel Inn. She told him at last to hold his tongue, she did not want to hear any more of it. She saw him on Wednesday evening coming from Mr. Wood’s house, in the custody of Pattock. She asked him how he got on. He said “All well, Sarah, at present.”
  Cross examined by the Common Serjeant—She said that her husband was at Guildford. She had not seen him since April—She had been in gaol since. She had been taken up in March, and been in prison ever since. She and her husband were living in Godalming at this time. It was dark about five o’clock on the 10th of February. She never made an improper appointment except once [Q What was there in this once?—A. I have done a great deal of harm by ???] (The witness here could scarcely answer, being overpowered by her feelings) Her husband was to have met Chalcraft at six. She set off from her husband’s at nine o’clock; her husband had left her about six o’clock. (The Common Serjeant was proceeding to question the witness about her husband, when he was stopt by the Court, as what she might say might incriminate him. It was mentioned on the part of the counsel for the defence, and admitted by the counsel for the prosecution that Thomas Hurst was not her husband, he being convicted of bigamy at these assizes for marrying her as his second wife. Any thing that she might say, therefore, had no reference to her husband.)
  After some pause, the examination went on. Then you knew of the murder, and gave no intimation of it till March? I did not. Did you not charge others with this horrid murder?—Yes, I did, and I am sorry for it. Who did you first charge?—I cannot recollect his name. You were sworn then, and charged that person on oath, without recollecting his name?—Yes. Who was the second person whom you charged?—I never mentioned the name but said another person was concerned; that other person was meant to be myself. Were you concerned then?—Yes, too, for I watched. Did you not charge another person still?—Yes. Who was that?—Thomas Hurst. Was that the person with whom you were living as your husband?—Yes. Was that after you accused these two men?—Yes. What share did you say Thomas Hurst took in the murder?—I said, he went down there. Was he taken up?—No, Sir, he was not. This Thomas Hurst was the person whom you called your husband?—Yes. What you said about him, was it false?—Yes.
  Re-examined by Mr. Gurney—Witness said, that she charged those who were not guilty before Mr. Woods. She named no person to Lord Middleton, but Chennel and Chalcraft. She was taken into custody in consequence of the declaration which she voluntarily made. Did you not state to Mr. Smallpiece, the Under-Sheriff at Kingston, that a man of the name of Scooly, who was once a servant of Mr. Chennel’s, was concerned?—Yes.
  Mr. Gurney said he was bound to declare that there was no foundation for this charge, as had been found on inquiry. The court asked, was there any truth in this?—No. She was confused, and began to mention the name without any foundation. Find any body suggested this?—No; it was all out of my own head. What induced you to do this?—She could not tell, nobody suggested it to her. The witness nearly fainted away in Court, and was obliged to be supported and to have smelling salts applied.
  Many other witnesses were examined, whose evidence established the prisoners’ guilt.
  The prisoners were then asked what they had to say in their own defence.
  Chennel gave an account of the transaction of Monday, which he partly read from a paper. The account did not vary from what appeared in evidence and his previous statement. He persisted in saying, that he used the same pipe when he returned to the inn as he had used before he left it. He went through the transactions of the night at Richmond Arms nearly as given by the master of that house. He mentioned a good deal of irrelevant matter about his conduct on Tuesday morning, which it is unnecessary to repeat.
  Chalcraft, when asked what he had to say, said he would state his defence, if the jury would give attention. He likewise gave an account of his conduct on Monday, stating what he did at the different hours, and brought in many things that had no reference to his exculpation. He delivered his story, introducing the most minute circumstances, and the most trifling dialogues, without the least stop or embarrassment, in a firm voice, and with great composure of manner. The only symptom of anxiety or agitation that appeared was a quivering in his lips, when he found it necessary to wet frequently with his tongue. He concluded by declaring “What I have said is true, so help me God.”
  Mr. Andrews then called witnesses in behalf of Chennel.
  James Chennel deposed, that he resides in Guildford, and was a brother of the deceased. He received a letter in November, from Mrs. Mary Gill, his sister, which he gave to be delivered to Mr. Chennel, of Godalming, by his son. He received no message from Mr. Chennel on his letter, except through his son. This examination, as inadmissible, was dropt.
  James Coles remembered the Monday night when Chennel was murdered. Saw Chennel the prisoner in the shop about eight o’clock at night. He went up the passage of his father’s house towards the street. Witness saw no more of him that night.—Witness went to him next morning, and found him in bed, and told him what had happened in his father’s house. When he heard it, he cried, “Lord have mercy upon us, is he quite dead?” He dressed himself in the clothes he had on the previous night, and witness saw no stain of blood on them. This was all the defence of Chennel.
  Chalcraft said, he had two witnesses, who were immediately called. Their testimony was of no consequence. The Jury almost immediately returned a verdict of Guilty against both prisoners. We observed very little change in the appearance or countenance either of Chalcraft of Chennel when the verdict was pronounced.
  The Learned Judge then proceeded to pass the awful sentence of the law, apparently much affected. He told the prisoners that they had been found guilty by a jury of their countrymen, after the most mature and patient investigation of their case; and he might now mention what he had studiously abstained from hinting before, that he thought the conclusion they had come to the only one to which any reasonable man could come on the evidence against them. After the long examination into which the Court had already entered, he felt that he could not much longer make a demand on their attention, but he could not omit stating to the prisoners the situation in which they stood with regard to the deceased. The one of them stood in the relation of a son—a relation which should always create the utmost reverence and love; the other in that of a servant, which should always command duty and respect. Murder committed in these relations could scarcely admit of aggravation, but the crime in their case had been aggravated by circumstances of almost unexampled atrocity. The one had lifted up his hand not only against his father, but that father aged and feeble; and the other against a master whom he himself had denominated kind and benevolent. If they had not yet prepared their minds by repentance to supplicate that God whom they had offended, they should employ the few hours that yet remained for that purpose, without uselessly denying their guilt, and endeavour to place their souls in a state to receive pardon in another world for a deed like this. He had only now to pronounce the awful sentence of the law, which was that they should be taken hence to prison from whence they came, and on Friday next carried to the place of execution, there to be hung by the neck till dead, and their bodies afterwards to be given to be anatomised and dissected according to the statute. This being the sentence of the law, the Lord have mercy on their souls. The prisoners were then led away, Chalcraft protesting that he was “as innocent as the child unborn,: and Chennel saying nothing. The latter seems a person about 40; he is a stout made man, rather inclined to be corpulent, with the outline of a good face, apparently rendered heavy and dull by the effects of indolence and irregular habits. He was dressed in a black jockey coat, a striped waistcoat, and a black neckerchief. He displayed on entrance into Court the utmost indifference to his situation, and did not appear to be much touched by any thing that occurred. The prisoner Chalcraft appeared in a smock frock with a coloured handkerchief tied carelessly about his neck; he had all the rustic appearance of his situation, joined to a considerable degree od acuteness in his eye and general intelligence in his countenance; he seemed secure and confident, but at the same time earnest and attentive.
  The trial began a few minutes after eight o’clock in the morning and lasted till nine in the afternoon; the pressure of the crowd was great during the whole of the day, which, together with the heat of the weather, made the situation of some of the audience almost intolerable. The windows being open, great numbers of people remained at them listening during the whole of the trial. The interest of the proceedings that were going on seemed to be as great outside as inside. The doors were surrounded, and the Court sometimes disturbed, by crowds pressing for admission which the Town Hall could not contain.
  During the Judge’s address, the prisoners appearing both fatigued, were allowed to sit down on the sides of the docks, Chalcraft had no Counsel. Mr. Common Sergeant and Mr. Andrews were Counsel for Chennel.

21-Aug-1818
Cambridge Chronicle & Journal

  … After the bodies of Chennel and Chalcraft had been cut down, they were received into the waggon which conveyed them to the place of execution, and extended on the elevated stage which had been constructed in the vehicle. The procession of officers, constables, &c. was then re-formed, and the remains of the murderers were conveyed in slow and awful silence through the town of Godalming, until they arrived at the house of the late Mr. Chennel. Here the procession halted, and the bodies were removed from the waggon into the kitchen of the house, one of them being placed on the very spot where the housekeeper, Elizabeth Wilson, was found murdered. After this the surgeons proceeded to perform the first offices of dissection, and the bodies in this state were left exposed to the gaze of thousand, who throughout the day rushed in to view them. The effect of this awful scene may be imagined, but not described.


21-Aug-1818
Stamford Mercury
MURDERS at GODALMING.
  George Chennel and John Chalcraft were arraigned for the wilful murder of George Chennel the elder, at Godalming, on the 10th of November last; and on a second indictment, for the murder of Elizabeth Wilson, by fracturing their skulls with a hammer, and cutting their throats.
  Mr. Gurney stated the case. In his preliminary observations, he said, that even the horrid crime of murder had its gradations of atrocity: It was aggravated when committed by the strong upon the feeble and unresisting—when by the servant against the master—and above all, when by the son against his aged father. The last was the dreadful charge which was imputed to the prisoner—the one was the son, and the other the servant, of the deceased. He mentioned this not to excite their passions; on the contrary, the Jury must not suffer themselves to be transported by their indignation at the crime, to be caused, by a premature judgment, to pronounce the accused guilty. They must discharge from their minds all they had heard elsewhere, and found their verdict only upon the evidence which should be adduced before them, for upon that alone they had sworn to found their verdict. With respect to that evidence, from which they must form the result of their opinion, it must of necessity be collected from a variety of circumstances, all tending to the same end. The murderer did not do his foul deed in the presence of witnesses; he chose night and solitude for the perpetration of his crime. The deceased, Mr. Chennel, was a respectable tradesman at Godalming, and was also a man of considerable property. The prisoner Chennel was his son, and the other prisoner his carman, and had been so many years, he having a little farm in addition to his trade of a currier. Eliz. Wilson, the other person murdered, was a harmless old woman, who had been for many years his housekeeper. The prisoner Chennel lodged in the town of Godalming, and usually took his meals at his father’s, but did not lodge, and it would be proved had not that filial feeling which a son ought to have for a father. On the morning of Tuesday the 11th of November last, about seven o’clock, the town of Godalming was alarmed with the account that both Mr. Chennel and his housekeeper were found murdered in their house, which was in the middle of the street of Godalming—the old gentleman in his bed, and the housekeeper in what was called the front kitchen. They were last seen alive at about eight o’clock on the Monday evening, and from circumstances the murder must have been committed from nine to ten o’clock. The old gentleman was a very regular man, and went to bed usually at nine; his housekeeper sat up after him for some time, and usually retired to rest at 10. He was found in his bed, and therefore it was done after he had retired; she was found in the kitchen at work, not having been to bed, and the work which lay near her was a shirt of the prisoner’s, which she was mending. It was therefore presumed, that it was before her usual time of going to rest. The person also who lived in the next house, and whose bed-room adjoined to Mr. Chennel’s, went to bed at 10 o’clock, and could hear any noise after that hour. In addition to this, a person was passing the house about half-past nine, and heard a scream, and afterwards something fall, but did not suspect any thing of the dreadful deed which was then most probably in perpetration. The next morning, when a farming servant of Mr. Chennel’s came to the stables for the horses at about six, he found Chalcraft there, as usual; and it was the conduct of Chalcraft that excited suspicion against him. They dressed their horses, and went to the house where usually the old gentleman and his housekeeper would be stirring at that hour. The door was open, but no on appeared; at length Chalcraft went into the front kitchen, and the other heard him calling his master, but no answer. Now it would be proved that the murdered body of the housekeeper lay in such a position, that when he opened the door he must have seen it, and indeed must have stepped over it to get to the stair-foot door, and therefore his affecting not to see it was a matter of great suspicion. In addition to this, when the alarm was given, he stated that his master was murdered up stairs, before he or any one had been up stairs.He was known to be the constant companion of the other prisoner, Chennel, and therefore he was immediately sent for, and on searching the box of Chennel two Bank-notes were found, one of them slightly tinged with blood, which notes would be traced to the possession of the father a few days before. The prisoner at once acknowledged the notes had been his father’s, and said that his father gave them to him on the preceding Sunday; he should, however, call evidence to prove that the prisoner in the early part of Monday could not pay a sum of 8½d., but about ten o’clock on Monday night, after the murder was supposed to be committed, he went to the Richmond Arms, in that town, and squandered money very profusely. As they were both suspected, they were required to say where they had been, and whether they were together on Monday evening. They both agreed that they had not seen each other since the preceding Friday. The falsity of this statement would be abundantly proved, for both Chalcraft and Chennel were seen on the spot at half-past nine on the evening of the murders, and Chennel was seen standing at the very passage which led to the deceased’s house, and a witness afterwards passing by saw a woman walking backward and forward before the door, apparently on watch. This woman, it was now evident, was one Sarah Hurst, an accomplice; and Chalcraft was seen walking towards his home, Hurst following him, and Chennel at the same time went back to the Richmond Arms which he had left some time before, he insisting that he went to look after a woman, and was gone so short a time, that the pipe he left behind him was burning when he returned. It was also singular, that Chalcraft had a short time before declared, that “there would be a bigger blow up before long than Godalming had ever seen.” With respect to Chennel the prisoner, he was separated from his wife, and was in the constant habit of using invectives against his father and the old woman. These were the circumstances of suspicion; but in addition to this, he should call Sarah Hurst, the accomplice in deed. The Jury knew that an accomplice was an infamous character, and ought not to be believed, unless confirmed by other testimony; and, in justice to the prisoner, he was bound to state, that this accomplice, Hurst, had accused A and B—he would not mention names—who, upon investigation, were clearly innocent. They would hear the whole case, and decide impartially. For the prosecution about 30 witnesses were then called.
  Geo. Woods and Charles Coston proved seeing the old people alive about eight o’clock on Monday the 10th November. J. Currington, the farming servant, stated, that on Tuesday morning, about half-past six, he went to the stables behind the house; he found Chalcraft there; the side-door of the kitchen was open, but his master was not up, nor the housekeeper. He and Chalcraft breakfasted in the back-kitchen; and as no one appeared, Chalcraft said he would call them. He heard him open the door leading to the kitchen, and call “Master;” but no reply was given. The witness afterwards went, and on opening the door, he saw a puddle of blood, and the housekeeper dead. They then both ran away into the street, and alarmed the neighbours.
  W. H. Coston, the next door neighbour, stated that he went to bed at ten; his door-way faced Chennel’s kitchen door, and at ten there was no light, and all was quiet; in the morning he was alarmed with others. Chalcraft was standing opposite the house, and said Old Bet and his master were both murdered. He, with others, searched the house; the heads were fractured and the throats cut.
  Several persons, who had assembled at the alarm, were examined, and they agreed that the old gentleman was found in his bed, and the housekeeper in the kitchen, in her clothes. Chennel, the son, was sent for to his lodgings. He went up stairs at the request of some, and, as described by one witness, he gave a side-look at his father’s corpse, and then sat down, and covered his face with his hands. In the house was found a hammer, which had unquestionably been the weapon with which the skulls of the deceased had been fractured, and a case knife covered with blood, with which the throats had been cut. The money in the old man’s breeches (about 6l.) had not been touched; but the till in the shop had been forced, and its contents taken away.
  Wm. Parsons, a surgeon, stated, that he saw the bodies early in the morning of Tuesday, and he was of the opinion that they were stunned first, and had their throats cut while in a state of insensibility. A witness of the name of George Austin, who spoke to the position of the body of the housekeeper, stated, that Chalcraft must have seen her on the floor when he called his master, and that he made him show him how he stood when he called; at the same time asking him why he did not open another door, which was the more obvious method. He made use of this remarkable expression, “You would have done as I did, if you knew the pedigree of the affair as I do.” He also asked him why he did not go up to see his master’s body. He replied, that he could not for all the town, because he never saw any man murdered but the man at Petersfield. Witness asked if he meant to say he had seen that man murdered? He said, no; he meant after he was murdered. The notes found at the prisoner Chennel’s were produced; one of them was slightly tinged with blood.—T. S. Allathorp, wharehouseman, of Gate-street, Lincoln’s-inn-fields, proved that he paid the notes to Mr. Chennel the elder on the 4th November. W. Coombes was waiter, in November last, at the Angel Inn, Godalming. He remembered the evening of the discovery of the murder; Chennel was at their house on that evening, with Sarah Hurst. He observed Sarah Hurst and Chalcraft whispering together. He heard nothing but these words by Sarah Hurst, “Hold your tongue, Chalcraft; I want to hear no more of it.” This ended the whispering. He saw Chennel in August last year, and said to him, “When your business is arranged, you will go and live with your father.” Chennel answered, he would go home to eat and drink, but not to sleep, because the housekeeper would know at what hour he came home. He hoped some morning, when he got up, he should find her with her throat cut; and if he met the men coming out of the door who had done the murder, he would not tell of it, though he were to be hanged for it himself; and that if he found them both so, he would not be the least sorry; nor, even if he committed the murder himself, should he think he had committed any sin. J. Ayles, a wheelwright, remembered Chalcraft coming to his shop in November last. Witness asked him, “What does Great George (meaning Chennel) do now?” Prisoner answered, “D—n me, I do not know what he does. He goes on letting off fireworks at the Richmond Arms. There will soon be a bigger blow up in Godalming than ever was known. You will hear of it.” J. Earl, a gardener, was in Mr. Chennel’s shop on Monday evening, where he saw young Chennel. He saw Chalcraft in the Town-hall when the examination was going on. Witness asked if Chennel had not a hand in it? The prisoner Chalcraft then trembled very much, and said it was a party concern.” Witness saw Chennel in the shop on Monday; he looked very wild. J. Tidy keeps the Richmond Arms, at Godalming. The prisoner Chennel, on Monday the 10th of November, came at seven o’clock, called for beer and tobacco, and paid 8½d. He then went away, leaving his pipe on the table; it was about nine o’clock. There were several other persons in the house, but none in his company. A person named Fisher sat by his side. Fisher and the prisoner went away together. About a quarter before ten he returned alone: he then called for a pint of beer and water—then a second—and then a third—which was drank between him and the landlord. He then said, “We shall want some beer for a cooler,” and ordered a pot. They had another. Chennel left his house about half-past eleven. Chennel was in witness’s house on Friday preceding, when he said he wished his father’s housekeeper was dead; and if he saw any one murder her, he would not tell of it. He had heard prisoner frequently wish her dead. W. Cooper, ostler at the Red Lion, opposite the Richmond Arms, remembered Fisher bidding him good night. Witness saw Chalcraft and Chennel a few minutes after he had seen Fisher. They went towards old Mr. Chennel’s. They had both smock-frocks on.
  W. Cotby lives at Godalming. On the night before Mr. Chennel’s death he went out of the Red Lion and talked with the last witness. He then saw Chennel and Chalcraft standing together. In going down the town he passed Mr. Chennel’s: when near Mr. C.’s house he heard a very sharp scream, apparently of a woman: he thought the scream came from Chennel’s passage. Witness walked about eight or ten paces, and saw a woman, who was apparently looking for something, and then he perceived Chennel standing in front of the passage, in the centre of it. Chennel appeared to have come up the passage, as he did not see him till then. The prisoner was speaking to the woman. After the scream, he heard a great fall. In coming back witness met Chalcraft, going home, between Mr. Chennel’s and his own house. Witness wished Chalcraft good night, which salutation he exchanged.
  Other evidence was given as to the prisoners’ being seen in Chennel’s passage, between nine and ten, on the night of the murder.
  Sarah Hurst appeared deeply affected, and could scarcely stand. She lived at Godalming, and knew the prisoners: saw Chalcraft at five in the evening of Monday the 10th of November. He asked if she should be down town that evening, and she answered she did not know if she should. He said he wished she would, giving no reason for his wish. She told him she would come down, if he wanted her: nothing more then passed. She saw him again a little after nine, a few doors below Mr. Chennel’s: he was then alone. She asked what he wanted. He answered, that he wanted her to stand by Mr. Chennel’s door to watch: nothing more then passed. He went to Mr. Chennel’s house, and witness walked in front of the door way, backward and forward: she remained there some time, but could not tell how long. She saw G. Chennel going in too when Chalcraft went. After Chgalcraft came out, she heard a screech from within doors. Chalcraft said, when he came out, “Is that you, Hurst?” and she said, “Yes.” She asked him what they had been doing. He answered, “We have done for them both.” Witness saw some blood on his round frock-sleeves, by the light of two candles in the opposite window. Witness asked how it came there; to which he answered, it was “the blood from them two.” Chennel came up while they were talking, from the passage, and asked who Chalcraft was talking to. He said he was talking to Hurst. One or two persons passed at this time. They parted—Chalcraft went down the town, and Chennel went up: witness likewise went up. The next night she was in company with Chalcraft, at a public-house, and he offered her 4l. to keep it secret. The prisoners being asked what they had to say in their defence, Chennel gave an account of the transactions of Monday, which he partly read from a paper. The account did not much vary from what appeared in the evidence and his previous statement. He persisted in saying that he used the same pipe when he returned to the inn as he had used before he left it. He went through the transactions of the night at the Richmond Arms nearly as given by the master of that house. He mentioned a good deal of irrelevant matter about his conduct on Tuesday morning, which it is unnecessary to repeat. Chalcraft, when asked what he had to say, likewise gave an account of his conduct on Monday, stating what he did at the different hours, but brought in many things that had no reference to the exculpation. He delivered this story, introducing the most minute circumstances, and the most trifling dialogues, without the least stop or embarrassment, in a firm voice, and with great composure of manner. The only symptom of anxiety or agitation that appeared was a quivering in his lips, which he found it necessary to wet frequently with his tongue. He concluded by declaring, “what I have said is true, so help me God.”
  Some witnesses in behalf of the prisoners were then called, but their testimony was of no consequence.
  The Judge(Mr. Serjeant Lens) then proceeded to sum up the evidence. He was not aware that he could do any thing more in this important case than merely recapitulate the accounts given by the witnesses of the conduct of the prisoners between eight and eleven o’clock on the 10th of November. If they could rely on any part of Sarah Hurst’s evidence, the decision of the Jury would be short and infallible; but her conduct did not tend to establish her credit. She, according to her own account, was appointed to watch whilst the murder was committed, and was therefore a party in the murder. The declarations of Chennel’s hatred were important; but the Jury were to consider that the expressions he used with regard to his father and his housekeeper, coarse and violent as they were, extended over a long course of time (as much as a year) before the fatal deed; and the Jury were to judge, whether they were the infatuation of criminality, unconsciously avowing its designs; or loose idle words, that had no definite meaning, and were never intended to avow any purpose. He thought that these expressions could hardly be taken to convey what they meant; and though they were not forgotten as evincing a general disposition to evil, and rendering what happened more probable, they were not to be relied on as declaring the intention of murder, which no man in his senses who meant to commit it would previously declare. The Learned Judge then went over the different parts of the evidence, and showed its bearing on the guilt or innocence of the prisoners with great discrimination and impartiality. He concluded an address to the Jury of two hours and three-quarters, about ten minutes before nine o’clock.
  The Jury almost immediately returned a verdict of Guilty against both prisoners. Very little change took place in the appearance or countenance of either of them when the verdict was pronounced.
  The Learned Judge proceeded to pass the awful sentence of the law, that they be executed on Friday, and their bodies afterwards be given to be anatomised and dissected.
  The prisoners were then led away, Chalcraft protesting that he was “as innocent as the child unborn,” and Chennel saying nothing. The latter seems a person about 40; he is a stout-made man, rather inclined to be corpulent, with the outline of a good face, apparently rendered heavy and dull by the effects of indolence and irregular habits. He was dressed in a black jockey coat and striped waistcoat, and a black neckerchief. He displayed, on his entrance into Court, the utmost indifference to his situation, and did not appear to be much touched by any thing that occurred. The prisoner Chalcraft appeared in a smock frock, with a colored handkerchief tied carelessly about his neck; he had all the rustic appearance of his situation, joined to a considerable degree of acuteness in his eye, and general intelligence in his countenance; he seemed secure and confident, but at the same time earnest and attentive.
THE EXECUTION.
The prisoners were executed on Friday in Godalming Marsh, within sight of the place where the murders were committed. Great pains had been taken by the Rev. Gentlemen who attended them, to bring them to a sense of their awful situation and their duty, but they would make no confession. It appeared, however, from words let fall by Chalcraft, that Chennel could disclose the whole, and he urged him to do so; but the other was obstinately silent. It is generally thought that they had entered into some horrid compact not to confess, for they acknowledged that the case was clear enough against them; and that they on a jury should have convicted others under the same circumstances. They were men of the vilest character, and several other murders have been, with great probability, imputed to them. It is singular that both Chalcraft and Chennel were at Petersfield at the time a murder was perpetrated, and that some of the clothes of the victim were found near Godalming where Chalcraft lived. Another murder was perpetrated at Farnham, and the two criminals were there at the time, while the knife found in the house appeared to be one of Chennel’s father’s. They are also suspected of the murder of a Roman Catholic Priest, near Reading, as they were near there at the time. Chalcraft had been the death of his first wife, by the abandoned course of his conduct; and the character of Chennel was of the most dissolute and irreclaimable description. The person whom they last murdered, and for whose murder they were executed, besides standing to the culprits in a relation which should have secured him from their violence, was an excellent and respected man. His murderer was his only son, his only child. He had treated him with great indulgence; he had set him up in life as a farmer, after he had deserted the profession to which he bred him; he had supplied his wants when by idleness and profligacy he had squandered his property; he had taken and offered to maintain his child; he had rescued him from prosecution when by forgery on himself and his brother he had exposed himself to that fate which he ought to have suffered; for this he had mortgaged his small freehold estate, and he would have given his all to reclaim him, when he imbrued his hands in his blood.
  The place of execution exhibited an immense number of spectators. Chennel sustained himself with the most perfect callousness till he was turned off, but the other was violently agitated, and could scarcely stand upright. After the bodies had been cut down, they were received into the waggon which conveyed them to the place of execution, and extended on an elevated stage which had been constructed in the vehicle. Amidst a procession of officers, constables, &c. the remains of the murderers were then conveyed in a slow and awful silence through the town of Godalming until they arrived at the house of the late Mr. Chennel. Here the procession halted, and the bodies of Chennel and Chalcraft were removed from the waggon into the kitchen of the house, one of them being placed on the very spot where the housekeeper, Elizabeth Wilson, was found murdered. After this, the surgeons proceeded to perform the first offices of dissection, and the bodies in this state were left exposed to the gaze of thousands, who throughout the day eagerly rushed in to view them. The effect of this awful scene may be imagined but not described. The horror and reflection, however, which it excited, will, it is hoped, produce that salutary warning and effect, which may in future prevent the recurrence of those deeds which gave rise to the sad spectacle.

22-Aug-1818
The Scotsman

  … After hanging an hour, they were cut down, and their bodies were given to Mr. Parsons, Surgeon, at Godalming, for dissection.

22-Aug-1818
Oxford University and City Herald

  …Much praise is due to the Under-Sheriffs, Messrs. Smallpiece and Abbott, for the good order and decorum with which every thing was conducted relative to the execution.


24-Aug-1818
Hampshire Telegraph
TWO GUINEAS REWARD.
  STRAYED, from Petersfield, on the 9th inst.—A large GREYHOUND, chiefly white, a black spot on each side of his head, with white between; one black spot on one side and another close to his tail; has let down one toe behind, and answers to the name QUIZ. Whoever will deliver the said Dog, to Mr. Hoare, Blue Posts, Portsmouth; Mr. Osborn, Saddler, Petersfield; or Mr. Cox, at Mr. Clements, Solicitor, Alton, will receive the above reward.
25-Aug-1818
Morning Chronicle
MEMBERS RETURNED TO SERVE IN THE NEW PARLIAMENT.
  Petersfield . . . H. Jolliffe, Esq.; G. Canning, Esq.

5-Sep-1818
Oxford Journal
The late Murders at Godalming
SOME ACCOUNT OF
CHENNEL & CHALCROFT.
  George Chennel the elder (murdered) was originally a person in the most humble condition of life. From being in the habit, when a boy, of cleaning shoes, he afterwards became a shoemaker, and at length got into the leather trade. His honesty and industry were proverbial, and he was scarcely ever known to be later in his shop and at business than five o’clock in the morning. The deceased, between twenty and thirty years ago, married a woman of decent connections, and of good character. By her he had issue only the wretched man who, but a few days since, expiated his life upon the scaffold, for the murder of his father! The mother died in child-bed—the son unhappily survived. Soon after this the unhappy Elizabeth Wilson became the housekeeper of Mr. Chennel, and in this situation she not only for 30 years evinced the utmost fidelity, but the most tender care and solicitude towards the infant, George. She acted in every respect during his growing years the part of a kind mother. As he advanced in life, and was led into the commission of trivial offences and enjoyments, Elizabeth Wilson was his sure friend and screen from the father’s chastisement. She was his apologist or defender, when detected in crime. The wretched young man, however, could not be said to have been guilty of any very gross or serious offence, for, on the contrary, his conduct generally was most praiseworthy, and the theme of general commendation. His attention to business was most remarkable: he obtained the name of “industrious George,” and, up to the period of his marriage, his prudence almost amounted to parsimony. It was by a successful impression made upon him by a few companions, that he was first induced to visit a public-house, where he saw his wife, a young woman, then on a visit from Chiddinford, the residence of her father, a wealthy farmer. To consummate the object he had in view, in paying his addresses to this young woman, may be attributed his first habits of mixing in public life, when his visits to the tavern became frequent. The result was the union of the parties, and , upon their marriage, the sum of 2,000l. was bestowed upon them, the father of Chennel giving one, and the father of his wife the other thousand. Chennel was then about 27 years of age, and, with the money thus bestowed, he purchased a small farm at Farncomb, near Godalming; a view of which the wretched culprit might have taken if he had had the courage to observe it from the scaffold upon which he terminated his guilty career. By his wife he had one child, a son, now about seven years of age, and who, it is understood, will inherit the residue of his father’s, and what would have been his own property, but for the horrid deed which brought the first to an untimely grave, and the other to an ignominious end. Chennel, upon taking possession of his farm, exhibited all the wonted industry and economy which had before distinguished him; but he had to contend with two misfortunes, namely, a fatal difference with his wife, and an unsuccessful produce from his estate. The result of the first terminated in a complete rupture and separation, and the second in failure. He was, in fact, obliged to compromise his debts, and the estate produced to his creditors but 6s. in the pound. It was during this derangement of his affairs, that Chennel first had recourse to that system of vice and dishonesty which afterwards grew into “crime of the deepest dye,’ and eventually produced his ruin and death. In his embarrassment Chennel contrived feloniously to raise 200l. from a Bank in the neighbourhood, upon the assumed name of a near relation, but who then, in consideration of himself and family, declined a prosecution. The deeds of horror, which have since been identified with the career of young Chennel, have justly drawn from the relative, to whom we have alluded, the deepest regret at his then mistaken mercy. Chennel, being dispossessed of his farm, betook himself to his former pursuit in the leather trade, shoemaking, &c. When this failed to produce sufficient advantages, he had recourse to manual labour, and though his habits became more vicious, and his visits to the public-house at night constant, he continued for sometime to work hard, and was known to have earned as much as eight or nine shillings per day, in the employment of a farmer. His industry and good character were at one time so much esteemed as to procure for him the situation of “Purveyor of Oats to the Army.”—Chennel, however, by degrees, became altogether dissolute and idle, embracing the company of loose women and profligate characters, treating his own wife with cruelty, and his father with insolence and disrespect. In this state of things, Chennel, about two years ago, separated from his wife, and took up his abode in lodgings at Godalming; but dieting and being constantly at the house of his father, he at once selected W. Chalcroft, the servant of the latter, to be his bosom friend and companion. This man had been a few years in the service of old Chennel, and though he was a character suspected and disliked by the whole town of Godalming, no particular charge which would subject him to public exposure and punishment could be adduced against him. His moral character, however, was indisputably bad; for, notwithstanding he had been twice married, and was the wretched father of three children by each wife, he was notorious for his attachment to the most abandoned-female characters, and for his neglect and cruelty to his wives. The same disease which terminated in the death of his first wife brought himself to the workhouse, and here it was that he met with the woman, Sarah Hurst, whose name and character have been rendered so odiously conspicuous in the history of the Godalming murders. The unhappy woman who became the second wife of Chalcroft has, with her six children, been long dependent upon the parish; his wages as a carman and labourer, curtailed a good deal by his own profligacy, being wholly insufficient to provide for them. It is a most remarkable coincidence; that on the day of Chalcroft’s execution his youngest child had just attained the age of 12 months; and it is also remarkable, that the same day and time marked the perpetration of the murder at Petersfield, of which he and his companion Chennel, then absent from home, were strongly suspected. So abandoned indeed had Chennel and Chalcroft become, that three other dep and desperate crimes have been attributed to them, namely, the murder of an old man at Farnham, of a Roman Catholic Clergyman at Reading, and the robbery and attempt at murder at the turnpike near Haslemere. When the murders at Godalming were first discovered, it may be remembered that young Chennel was called up from his bed at his lodgings. Being made acquainted with the dreadful circumstances, his inquiry was remarkable:—“Is my father quite dead?” This would imply the idea that he was not himself the hand that dealt out death to the parent, but that he might have been the murderer of Elizabeth Wilson. This is strongly borne out by the fact of his declarations from the moment of his apprehension.—Those it will be seen were general and particular. When generally questioned, he said, “I am innocent;” when particularly interrogated, he emphatically said, “I never murdered my father!” It is a fact not yet made known, that the deluded criminal, upon entering the house on the morning of the murder, tore up the lease and other papers of his father’s house.
  Chennel, no doubt, had determined upon suicide, in case of apprehension and conviction. When taken to the Little George public-house, W. Austen (son of the proprietor,) said to him, “George, I desire you will deliver up the large penknife you carry about you.” Chennel at first refused, but the instrument being forced from him, he exclaimed in a spirit of rage and disappointment to the person named, “depend upon it, I’ll mark you for that.” Again, when stripped and searched on the night of his conviction, before entering his cell, he was deprived of his braces and handkerchief. Of this he complained most bitterly, declaring that it was little less than barbarity to take his handkerchief, and that he would sooner have his flannel waistcoat torn from his back than lose his braces. Mention has been frequently made of a third individual being actually engaged in the murders of Mr. Chennel and his housekeeper, and the idea was supported by the declarations at a certain period of Sarah Hurst. Upon this point, it is known, that immediately after the transaction, Chennel and another, whose name appears in the trial, were confronted together, and words became warm between them. They talked of the murder, and the person to whom we have alluded tauntingly said to Chennel, “Hold your tongue, George—I’ll bet you 5l. I could produce you to the party, who did the thing, in five minutes!” In a subsequent conversation, this person was told, that Chennel had thrown out suspicions against him. His retort was, “George, and be —— to him, if he stood before me, and dare say a word, I’d make him tremble in his shoes in five minutes!” These strong insinuations led naturally to further inquiry, but the person who uttered them became dumb, and was only afterwards heard to say, “I see you want to pump me; but it won’t do.” Soon after the murder of old Chennel, two persons, Messrs. Weale and Grenham, of Godalming, were appointed trustees to his estate, and they proceeded to sell it. There were two different sales, and from the produce of these, young Chennel was allowed a comfortable weekly stipend, during the long period of his imprisonment, as well as ample means for his defence when brought to trial. It will excite some surprize, however, to know, that with all this supply of money, Chennel never made the slightest offer of assistance to his wretched companion Chalcroft; never once inquired for him while in prison, nor manifested the least sympathy or feeling towards him. The character of the man throughout was, in fact, a continued exhibition of insensibility and obduracy.

7-Sep-1818
Hampshire Chronicle

  Died, last week, at Terwick Parsonage, near Petersfield, the Rev. J. M. Sclater, universally lamented.

14-Sep-1818
Hampshire Chronicle
GAME DUTY.—LIST I.—COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON
  LIST of Persons who have obtained GENERAL CERTIFICATES at the rate of Three Pounds Thirteen Shillings and Sixpence each, for the Year 1818.
  (All from Petersfield)
  Greetham, Charles,
  Meeres, John,
  Small, John, jun.

19-Oct-1818
Hampshire Chronicle
NOTICE.
  ALL Persons having any claim or demand on the Estate of the late Mr. HENRY CAWLEY, sen. of Petersfield, in the county of Southampton, Carpenter, deceased, are requested to forward their respective accounts to Mr. John Cawley, of Petersfield aforesaid, Auctioneer and Appraiser, that they may be examined and discharged. And all Persons indebted to the said Estate are requested to pay the amount of their respective debts to the said John Cawley forthwith, or they will be sued for the same.
Petersfield. Sept. 1, 1818.

2-Nov-1818
Hampshire Telegraph
Extract from an Act of Parliament for Paving the Town of Portsmouth :—After reciting the limits in page 8. Sec. 18, see page 24. Sec. 62..

5-Nov-1818
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

  Some of the Charters of the Borough of Petersfield, and other ancient records relating to it, have been recently discovered; they possess much interest, and shew the antiquity and importance of the place and borough. By one of these Charters privileges similar to those enjoyed by the citizens of Winchester were, with a Guild, &c. granted to the Burgesses of Petersfield, in A.D. 1190. The town appears to have been of considerable note in the time of Henry II.


14-Dec-1818
Hampshire Chronicle

Cheltenham to Brighton.— … Another route for part of the road from Cheltenham to Brighton has been pointed out, but until some parts of it are widened and improved, it cannot be recommended for stage coaches, namely from Petersfield, through Midhurst and Petworth, to Brighton. The Earl of Egremont has, with great liberality and public spirit, done much towards improving this communication with Brighton, and the road to that place from Midhurst is very good, but from Midhurst to Petersfield it is in may places very narrow and bad, though it may be made a good road at a very trifling expense. …

21-Dec-1818
Hampshire Chronicle
THE MIRROR OF FASHION
  The Marquis of ANGLESEA and the Hon. Captain PAGET left town yesterday, to join a large shooting party at Sir HARRY FEATHERSTONE’s seat, Up Park, Petersfield, Hants.

1819

4-Jan-1819
Hampshire Telegraph

  LOST from the Mail, on Sunday night the 27th ult. Between Petersfield and Liphook,— PARCEL, wrapped in two silk handkerchiefs, containing a Copy of a Brief, and other articles of little value.—Whoever has found the same, and will bring it to the Printers, or Parade Coffee House, Portsmouth, will receive FIVE GUINEAS reward; and whoever detains it after this notice will be prosecuted.

26-Jan-1819
Morning Post

  FAIR OAK LODGE, about five miles from Petersfield—To be SOLD, a complete FERME ORNEE, with about Sixty-five acres of Land. The house contains numerous comfortable apartments, a warm bath on the best principles, with suitable offices of every description, and farm-yard, is encircled by luxuriant plantations of considerable growth, together with lawns and pleasure grounds, and water tastefully laid out, at great expense; there is an ice-house, and capital kitchen garden well stocked, and green-house; the property is in a well known sporting country, and immediate possession may be had. Apply to Messrs. S. and W. Lowe and Cowburn, Tanfield-court, Temple; or to C. H. Tatham, Esq. Queen-street, May-fair.


29-Mar-1819
Hampshire Chronicle
TIMBER FOR SALE.
  TO be SOLD by AUCTION, by JOHN CAWLEY, at the Dolphin Inn, Petersfield, on Thursday the 1st day of April, 1819, at five o’clock in the afternoon,—The following Lots of capital OAK, ASH, & ELM TIMBER, now standing in the parish of Eastmeon, in the county of Southampton:
On Rothercomb Farm.
  Lot 1.—62 Oak Trees, numbered with white paint from 1 to 62
   11 Ash Trees, numbered from 1 to 11.
  Lot 2.—71 Oak Trees, numbered from 63 to 133.
   25 Ash Trees, numbered from 12 to 36.
   3 Elm Trees, numbered from 1 to 3.
On Langrish Farm.
  Lot 3.—68 Oak Trees, , numbered from 1 to 68.
   9 Ash Trees, numbered from 1 to 9.
  Lot 4.—57 Oak Trees, numbered from 69 to 125.
   44 Ash Trees, numbered from 10 to 53.
On Stroud Bridge Farm.
  Lot 5.—109 Oak Trees, numbered from 1 to 109.
   63 Ash Trees, numbered from 1 to 63.
  ☞ For a view of the Timber apply on the respective Farms, and for further particulars to the Auctioneer, or Mr. C. J. Hector, Solicitor, Petersfield.

5-Apr-1819
Hampshire Chronicle

  TO be LET, for a Term of Years, (with immediate Possession), —PRIORS DEAN FARM; consisting of 300 acres, (chiefly arable); situate six miles from Alton, and six from Petersfield. The Farm is in regular course of husbandry; and the Stock may be taken to at a valuation—For further particulars, apply to the Bailiff, at the Farm.

7-Apr-1819
Morning Chronicle

  Valuable Freehold Farm of Two Hundred Acres, near Petersfield, Hants, with early Possession.—By Mr. ADAMSON, at the Auction Mart, on Thursday, May 20, at 12.
  A Very valuable and desirable FREEHOLD ESTATE, called STODHAM and CHEEK FARM, situated near Lys, about two miles from Petersfield, on the London road; comprising a capital Farm of about two hundred Acres of Arable, Pasture and Meadow Land, and a thriving Plantation, divided into convenient inclosures; an excellent Farm-house, barns, stabling, and all requisite outbuildings—Further particulars had of Mr. Briggs, solicitor, No. 53. Lincoln’s Inn-fields; of Messrs. Hector and Mitchell, solicitors, Petersfield; at the Mart; and of Mr. Adamson, Fenchurch-street, London.


7-May-1819
Morning Chronicle
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF KING’S BENCH, MAY 6.
  Mr. WARREN moved for a Rule to shew Cause why an information in the form of quo warranto should not be filed against Mr. John Mears, Mayor of Petersfield, Hants, to shew by what right he held that office. It appeared, that the Mayor of Petersfield is annually chosen by the Court Leet, and Mr. Warren represented, that the Jury by whom Mr. Mears was elected, had been illegally summoned.
  The Court granted a Rule to shew cause.

8-May-1819
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser
HOUSE OF COMMONS.
FRIDAY, MAY 7.
  A petition was presented from Petersfield in favour of the Elector’s Oath Bill.


10-May-1819
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
WINCHESTER.
SATURDAY, MAY 8.

  MAYOR OF PETERSFIELD.—COURT of KING’S BENCH, May, 6.—This day Mr. Warren moved for a rule to shew cause why an information in the nature of quo warranto should not be filed against Mr. John Meeres, the Mayor of Petersfield. It appears that the Mayor of this borough is elected by the Jury of the Court of Leet, and that he exercises no public duty whatsoever, except that of presiding and making the return at elections of members to serve in Parliament for the borough. The application was founded on two objections to the late election. The first was, that the Jury was illegally nominated and appointed by the Steward of the Court Leet, who is the Judge, and as such presides there; and secondly, that there was serving on the Jury so illegally nominated a person not duly qualified by being a resident within the manor, and that therefore all the acts of that Jury were void. The Court seemed to think the matter of great importance, and granted the application, without requiring the Counsel to go fully into the arguments on the subject.
17-May-1819
Hampshire Telegraph

  BIRTHS.—On Sunday last, at Fair Oak Lodge, near Petersfield, the Hon. Mrs. Charles Paget, of a son.



31-May-1819
Hampshire Chronicle
COURT OF KING’S BENCH, May 24, 1819.
  MAYOR OF PETERSFIELD—Mr. WARREN moved to make the Rule which he had obtained absolute in this case. It will be recollected that a quo warranto was recently granted against Mr. John Meeres, calling upon him to shew by what authority he claims to be Mayor of Petersfield. We have before stated, that the Mayors of this borough are elected by a Court Leet; and two objections were taken to this election. The first was that the Jury was illegally nominated and appointed by the Steward of the Court Leet, who is the Judge, and as such presides there; and the second that there was serving on the Jury so illegally nominated, a person mot duly qualified by being a resident within the Manor, and that therefore all the acts of that Jury were void.
  Mr. SCARLETT opposed the present application, which he said appeared to be founded on a misconception of the nature of this borough. The affidavits did not contain any thing about the borough, but simply stated it to be a Court Leet. A Court Leet undoubtedly it was, but it was an ancient customary Court, regulated and governed entirely by custom. His learned Friend (Mr. Warren) had in his affidavits introduced a variety of Stewards, who stated the customs of their Courts; and it appeared, though in general, he admitted, that they did not nominate the Jury, that they all varied in some degree; and that none of the precepts used by them were consistent with that precept for summoning a Jury, which he found mentioned in the learned treatise on Court Leets by Chief Justice Scroggs. In conclusion, he stated, that he did not know whether the new lights thrown on the borough might not discover some other person to be the Returning Officer, but that he was not yet found, and he trusted that they should keep the present.
  LORD CHIEF JUSTICE ABBOTT enquired what was the nature of the office in question?
  Mr. SCARLETT stated, that Petersfield was an ancient borough, which had returned Members of Parliament as long as any borough had; that there was no charter, and that the only duty the Mayor had to perform was to make the returns of these Members. That the right of voting was in the freeholders, and that it appeared from the affidavits of the present Steward, who had held that office nearly sixteen years, the Rev. James Cookson, Thomas Chitty, and others, some of whom recollected the place fifty or sixty years, that these freeholders had always been accustomed to serve on the Leet Juries, and that the Steward had always been accustomed to insert the names of the Jurors in his precept to the Bailiff, and that nobody remembered a different practice; and he therefore contended that as Magna Charta upheld the customs and privileges of Courts Leet, the Court could not, on any principle, say, that these customs were vicious.
  Mr. MARRYAT followed on the same side, and argued, that as the Juror who was objected to as a non-resident, was a freeholder having lands within the borough he was competent to serve on the Jury.
  LORD CHIEF JUSTICE ABBOTT.—“The Rev. James Cookson, clerk, is the person objected to, as not being a resiant—you state that he has a freehold?”
  Mr. JUSTICE BAYLEY.—“Is he a freeholder in possession or not; does he occupy?”
  Mr. MARRYATT said, that did not appear from the affidavits, but that he was told the premises were in the occupation of a tenant.
  Mr. JUSTICE BAYLEY.—“Have you any authority which warrants the putting upon the Jury a man who is not resident, merely upon the ground of his being a freeholder?”
  LORD CHIEF JUSTICE ABBOTT.—“And without any necessity?”
  Mr. MARRYAT said, that he was not aware of any authority which prevents any body being put on the Jury unless he takes the objection.
  Mr. JUSTICE BAYLEY.—“Then you think that the Steward in this case might have nominated 15 persons, all of them residing at Portsmouth, or, if Mr. Scarlett would like it better, at Peterborough?”
  Mr. SCARLETT.—“I do not say that, but I say the Steward is bound by custom.”
  LORD CHIEF JUSTICE ABBOTT.—“And you say that the custom is to swear persons who are not resiants?” Mr. SCARLETT.—“Yes, there are a limited number of freeholders in the borough, and those alone are to serve on the Jury.”
  Lord Chief Justice ABBOTT.—“Freeholders only?”
  Mr. Justice HOLROYD.—“Are there resiants enough in the borough to serve?”
  Mr. MARRYATT.—“Yes, my Lord, there have always been enough.”
  The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said, that he thought the rule ought to be made absolute to put the question in a course of trial.
  Mr. MEREWETHER, who also opposed the rule, said, that if the 13th was improperly appointed, still if there were 12, that would be sufficient.
  Mr. JUSTICE BAYLEY.—“Is there any authority which says, 12 good Jurors are at liberty to attend, if there is a 13th improperly named, because that 13th may influence the judgement of the others?”
  Mr. MEREWETHER.—“There are authorities, I believe, for it.”
  Lord Chief Justice ABBOTT.—“No, there are no authorities—if you have any thing to state, you may urge it hereafter just as well.”— Rule made absolute.



3-Jun-1819
Morning Chronicle
COURT OF KING’S BENCH, JUNE 2.
ARTHUR MORRIS, ESQ. V. HENRY HUNT.
  … These insinuations, he said, were the more unjustifiable, when it was considered, that probably other Candidates for a seat in Parliament, had been as backward as himself in paying their election debts. He was not disposed to follow the Learned Counsel through his peregrinations at Lewes and Petersfield, but it was not unlikely that the Learned Counsel might be subjected to the same species of complaint.
  Mr. SCARLETT—In all events, Mr. Hunt, I have paid my bills at Petersfield.
  Mr. HUNT resumed, and complained of the taunts which had been thrown out against him by the Learned Counsel, and alluded to the injury he had sustained from the improper mention of his name by the Learned Counsel, at a late trial at York, in associating it with that of Sir Samuel Romilly.
  Mr. SCARLETT—I don’t know what you mean; but if you wish to report accurately what I said a hundred and fifty miles off, I beg you will do so. I have no wish to conceal what I then said. I think I then said, that you did Sir Samuel Romilly all the harm you could, by saying that you were of the same side with him.

18-Jun-1819
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

  The late Mayor of Petersfield having disclaimed his right to that office, and suffered judgement to go against him, prevents for the present the discussion of the several constitutional and interesting points intended to have been raised, had the Quo Warranto Information been tried at the next Winchester Assizes, as at first expected.


21-Jun-1819
Hampshire Telegraph
NOTICE TO CREDITORS..
  THE Creditors of JOHN THARP, formerly of Froxfield, near to Petersfield, in the County of Hants, late of Colemore, near to the same place, in the said County, Husbandman, and last a Prisoner for Debt in the Fleet Prison, and who was discharged therefrom at the General Quarter Sessions of the Peace, holden by Adjournment at the Guildhall, in and for the City of London, on Monday the 18th day of November, in the year of our Lord, 1811, by virtue of an Act passed in the Fifty-first year of the Reign of his present Majesty, entitled “An Act for the Relief of certain Insolvent Debtors in England,” are requested to send an Account of the Debts due to them respectively from the said Insolvent, on or before the first day of July, 1819, preparatory to making a first and final Dividend of his Estate and Effects, to Messrs. Hector and Mitchell, Petersfield, Solicitors to the Assignee.

10-Jul-1819
Dublin Evening Post

  PEERAGE OF IRELAND.— … The last vacancy, occasioned by the extinction of the Peerages of Viscount Longueville, Viscount Howe and Earl of Belvedere, was filled up by the promotion of George Canning, Esq. M. P. for Petersfield in Hampshire (brother-in-law of Lord Castlereagh, and first cousin to the President of the Board of Control) to the dignity of Baron Garvagh, of Garvagh, Co. Londonderry, the estate of the Canning family from the time of James I. granted to George Canning, younger son of the ancient Roman Catholic family of Canning, of Foxcote, in Warwickshire, who settled in Ireland in that reign.

12-Jul-1819
Hampshire Chronicle
WINCHESTER, SATURDAY, JULY 10.
  Yesterday the Petersfield Agricultural Society held their annual meeting; a considerable number of gentlemen and agriculturalists assembled in a field adjoining the town to witness the exhibition of stock, which was highly meritorious to the judgement and industry of the exhibitors, and, in reference to the whole, much superior to the last year’s show. Several beautiful specimens from the flocks of Sir H. Featherstonehaugh, Messrs. Scott, Blount, and Lipscomb, were much admired, and we were highly gratified with the appearance of several beautiful yoke of oxen. At three o’clock the members of the Society, with a numerous attendance of gentlemen of landed interest, and amateurs, adjourned to the Dolphin Inn, where a plentiful dinner was provided, when the President, R. Norris, Esq. Basing Park, took the chair. … After the awards were delivered, several appropriate toasts were given from the chair. “Constitution and King.”—“The Prince Regent.”—‘The Petersfield Agricultural Society, and success to it.”—“The Good use of the Plough.”—“Good Grazing.”—“Breeding in all its branches.”—“The Farmers of the County of Hants.” …

19-Jul-1819
Salisbury & Winchester Journal
WINCHESTER.
SATURDAY, JULY 17.
  At the above Sessions, Gen. Wm. Neville Cameron, of Leigh House, Christchurch, and Hylton Jolliffe, Esq. of Petersfield, qualified to act as Magistrates.

21-Jul-1819
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

  The recent exposition of the accounts of Churcher’s College, Petersfield, has excited great astonishment and concern. They. However, most forcibly point out the absolute necessity which there exists of having annual Returns made of Receipts and Expenditure of all the Charitable Foundations in the Kingdom, to be presented to parliament in the same manner as the Accounts of the Irish Schools; and in no case should all the Trustees or Managers of these Institutions be relatives or members of the same family, as unfortunately is, we understand, the case of the College at Petersfield, which has been under the control of one family for upwards of 50 years!!


26-Jul-1819
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser
ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
WINCHESTER.
CARTER AND OTHERS, ASSIGNEES OF MINCHIN, CARTER, AND KELLY,
v. TOLLERVEY, SENIOR.
  This was an action brought by the Assignees, under the Commission issued and awarded against the Portsmouth Bank, to recover from the defendant the sum of 3461l. 3s. 9d. the balance of account due from the defendant to the Bank.
  …
  Henry Besant, the first witness, proved the execution of a mortgage deed for upwards of 30,000l. by Messrs. Minchin, Carter, and Kelly, dated the 9th of June, 1818; …
  A post-boy at Portsea proved the hiring of a chaise at one or two in the morning of the 10th of November, the day on which the Commission issued, and that he drove Mr. Carter and Mr. Kelly to Petersfield; and the servants of those Gentlemen proved that they had left home early on the morning of the 10th, and that they did not return for a considerable time afterwards. …


5-Aug-1819
Morning Post
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF CHANCERY, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4,
_______

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. HYLTON JOLLIFFE, ESQUIRE, AND OTHERS, TRUSTEES OF CHURCHER’S COLLEGE, PETERSFIELD.

  The ATTORNEY-GENERAL moved that these defendants against whom an information had been filed, as trustees of a charitable institution in the borough of Petersfield, at the relation of several inhabitants of theta place, might be ordered to bring into Court the accounts of the college, and the books of the proceedings of the trustees; and also to transfer the further sums of 1000l. four per cents. and 388l. Navy five per cents. into the name of the Accountant-General, which not being opposed, was ordered to be done within fourteen days.

9-Aug-1819
Morning Post
TOWN HALL, ALTON.
GRAND ORRERY, which moves Fourteen Feet high.
  MR. BIRD respectfully informs the Nobility, Gentry, and inhabitants of Alton, that he intends to give a Course of three ASTRONOMICAL LECTURES, on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, the 9th, 10th, and 11th inst.; after which it is his intention to visit Petersfield.

16-Aug-1819
Hampshire Telegraph
MONEY.
  SEVERAL SUMS of MONEY, from £1000 to £5000, will be ready to be advanced on Mortgage of adequate Landed Property, at Michaelmas next, on application to Messrs. Hector & Mitchell, Solicitors, Petersfield.
30-Aug-1819
Hampshire Telegraph
PETERSFIELD,—HANTS.
To Postmasters, Innkeepers, and Others.
  TO be LET, and entered upon at Michaelmas next,—All that well accustomed INN, called the Dolphin Inn, situate in Petersfield, adjoining the Turnpike-road from London to Portsmouth, distance 18 miles from the latter place.
  For particulars apply (if by letter, post-paid), to Messrs. Hector and Mitchell, Solicitors, Petersfield.

13-Sep-1819
Hampshire Chronicle
RED LION, PETERSFIELD.
  H. HOLDAWAY returns his most sincere thanks to the Nobility, Gentry, commercial Gentlemen, and Public in general, for the numerous favours conferred on him during his residence at the Dolphin Inn, in this town, and begs leave to inform them, that he is about to remove entirely to the above Inn, on the right hand side of the road to London, which he has fitted up in a superior style, with good beds, the choicest wines, well stored larder, &c. As a necessary appendage to an Inn, he has good stall stables, lock-up coach-houses, neat post-chaises, with able horses, and careful drivers.
Coaches to and from London daily.
  H. H. hopes, by the greatest assiduity, to merit their future support.
  N.B. An Ordinary will be provided on market days.
13-Sep-1819
Hampshire Telegraph
PETERSFIELD,—HANTS.
  TO be LET, and entered upon at Michaelmas,—A comfortable DWELLING-HOUSE, in the Market-place, Petersfield.—Apply to the Printers; or to Mr. Robert Parsons, Post Office, Petersfield.

13-Sep-1819
Hampshire Telegraph

  Died, at Niton, in the Isle of Wight, on Wednesday last, after a protracted illness, very deeply regretted by a large family, and an extensive circle of friends, Mrs. Hector, wife of C. J. Hector, Esq. Banker, of Petersfield.


11-Oct-1819
Hampshire Telegraph
DOLPHIN INN, PETERSFIELD.
  BARNARD DEANE begs respectfully to announce to the Public, that he has taken and entered upon the above commodious INN, where by his exertions and assiduity, combined with the great accommodations, the DOLPHIN IN affords, he hopes to merit their patronage and support.
  **** Neat Post Chaises, excellent stabling, Lock-up Coach-House, &c.
  PETERSFIELD, Oct.10, 1819.

20-Oct-1819
Morning Post
PETERSFIELD.
(FROM THE HAMPSHIRE TELEGRAPH, OCT. 16, 1819)
  On Thursday last a numerous party of Freeholders and Inhabitants of the Borough of Petersfield gave an excellent dinner of game, and all the delicacies of the season, at the Red Lion Inn, to NATHANIEL ATCHESON, Esq. and a few of his private friends, to celebrate the progress which has been made in the cause of independence in that Borough, and in the proceedings which have been commenced against the Trustees of Churcher’s College for the investigation of their accounts, in order that the benevolent intentions of the founder may in future be strictly carried into effect, so that none but the sons of the townspeople be admitted on the foundation. HENRY CLIFTON ATKINSON, Esq. in the Chair. After dinner the usual loyal and constitutional toasts, with others appropriate to the occasion, were given and drunk with the warmest plaudits, and the company were highly amused with several glees and duets, which were sung in the course of the evening.

25-Oct-1819
Sussex Advertiser
To Ironmongers.
———
TO BE DISPOSED OF,
  An old established Concern in the IRONMONGERY TRADE, in a Market Town in HAMPSHIRE; and connected therewith, the Auctioneering Branch has been carried on extensively, upwards of forty years.
  Particulars may be known by enquiring of Schoolings, Lawrence, and Everet, Ironmongers, Great Garden Street, Whitechapel, London; Mrs. Wilmer, Petersfield, Hants; or Mr. Pocock, Surveyer, Knightsbridge, near London.
28-Oct-1819
Morning Post
FASHIONABLE ARRIVALS
  … Hon. Sir Charles and Lady Paget, in Harley-street, from Fair-Oak-Lodge, near Petersfield.


10-Nov-1819
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser

  CHURCHER’S COLLEGE.—Much important and interesting information having been obtained respecting the management of “Churcher’s College,” Petersfield, an order has, we understand, been obtained to amend the original Information filed against the Trustees, that they may put in an answer to the further inquiries, which are necessary to the complete development of the actual state of this excellent Institution.

11-Nov-1819
Public Ledger & Daily Advertiser
BAILIFF OF THE COURT LEET OF PETERSFIELD.
  Mr. Warren applied for a similar rule against J. Tee, the Bailiff, to whom both of the objections formerly urged against Mr. Meeres applied, which the Court also granted.

11-Nov-1819
Morning Advertiser
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
———
COURT OF KING’S BENCH, NOV. 10.
  Mr. WARREN moved to file an information in the form of quo warranto, calling on John Meers, Mayor of the Borough of Petersfield, to shew by what authority he holds that office.
  A motion of this sort was made in Trinity Term, upon the ground that he had been chosen Mayor at a Court Leet (according to the custom of the Borough), at which the Jury had been improperly nominated by the Steward. In consequence of that motion Mr. Meers was re-elected; and in the present instance Mr. Warren contended that his election was still objectionable, inasmuch as the Jury which elected him was nominated partially by the Steward who returned him, so that the election might be said to be a mere arbitrary proceeding. The election, he argued, was illegal, by the Statute of the 11th of Henry the Fourth, and the law laid down by Lord Coke in his 3d Institute, page 31 to page 33.
  The Court granted a Rule to shew cause.

11-Nov-1819
Morning Post
LAW INTELLIGENCE.
———
COURT OF KING’S BENCH, WEDNESDAY, NOV. 10.
  Mr. WARREN moved for a rule to show cause, why an information in the nature of a quo warranto, should not be filed against John Meeres, the Mayor of Petersfield, calling upon him to show by what authority he exercises that office. Mr. Warren stated, that it might be in the recollection of their Lordships, that he had made a similar application in Easter Term last, which was founded upon two objections to the Election of the Mayor, who is chosen at the Court Leet, held within the Borough of Petersfield. The first objection then was, that the Steward of the Court Leet, who is the Judge, had nominated and selected particular persons, whom he directed the Bailiff to summon as Jurors at the Leet, whereby he united in himself the two capacities of Judge and Jury, as the persons so nominated by him were persons who would, in all probability, strictly conform to his wishes; the other objection was, that upon this Jury there was serving a person who was not resident within the jurisdiction of the Court. Upon one or both of these grounds, the Court had granted him the Rule for the quo warranto. An information in the nature of a Quo Warranto had accordingly been exhibited against the Mayor, and Mr. Meeres, who then held the office, had thought proper to file a disclaimer, and some parties, whom he knew not, had thereupon applied to the Court for a mandamus, to the Steward of the Court Leet, to hold a Court for the Election of a new Mayor. At the Court Leet held in pursuance of this Writ of Mandamus, Mr. Meeres had been re-elected to serve the office of Mayor of the Borough; but the Jury had been selected and nominated to the Bailiff by the Steward, precisely in the same manner as they had been at the former Court Leet, and upon this ground Mr. Warren stated that he founded the present application. At the Court, persons who had a right as resiants and freeholders within the Borough to attend there, had been present, and objected to the course pursued by the Steward, who nevertheless persisted in the same, thought there were many attending in Court who were duly qualified, and willing to serve on the Jury. The Learned Counsel then went on to say, that he believed there was no principle so firmly established in our law, as that the functions of Judge and Jury must be kept distinct; in the present instance that principle had been violated, for although some of the very extensive powers formerly vested in the Leet had now fallen into disuse, yet many minor offences were still presented at that Court, of which the Steward was the Judge. He would not, he said, occupy the time of their Lordships by detailing the powers and functions of the Court Leet, but he would merely refer them to my Lord Coke’s comment on Statute 11. Henry IV., wherein it is expressly laid down that Juries shall be returned by Sheriffs and Bailiffs of Franchises, “without any denomination to the Sheriff or Bailiffs of Franchises, before made by any person of the names which by him should be impanelled,” and upon these grounds he trusted that the Rule would be granted.
  The Court, after referring to the Statute, granted the Rule.
BAILIFF OF THE COURT LEET OF PETERSFIELD.
  Mr. Warren applied for a similar Rule against Mr. John Tee, the Bailiff, to whom both of the objections formerly urged against Mr. Meeres applied, which the Court also granted.

15-Nov-1819
Hampshire Chronicle

  All Persons having any claim or demand on the late Mr. WILLIAM PINK, of East-meon, Hants, Surgeon, deceased, are requested to transmit an account (within one month from the date hereof) to Mr. William Weeks, of Eastmeon, or Mr. J. A. Minchin, of Petersfield.
Nov. 10, 1812


29-Nov-1819
Morning Chronicle

  Mr. Warren, on Wednesday last, in the Court of King’s bench, moved to make absolute a rule to shew cause why a Quo Warranto information should not be filed against a Mr. Meeres, the Mayor of Petersfield, and Returning Officer at Elections, who had been elected into that office by a Jury of the nomination and selection of the Steward of the Court Leet there, and who of course is Judge of the Court. The motion was granted and the rule made absolute.