ROTTEN BOROUGHS.—Many persons will remember the beauties and excellencies of our glorious Constitution when "Gatton" and "Old Sarum," by virtue of their old trees and dunghills, sent members to Parliament. It was thought that the Reform Bill had, at least, extinguished all the rotten boroughs, and that nothing more would be heard of schedule A. When, however, the reform of the Reform Bill comes, (and we hope it will not be long first,) there will even now be found something very nearly akin to the rotten boroughs of former times. Did any of our readers ever hear of such a place as "Midhurst?" or do they know anything of its locality? This village, of 1,536 inhabitants, sends one member to Parliament; while Huddersfield, with its wealth, and population of 40,000, sends no more. There is a place called "Cricklade," in Wiltshire, (of no importance whatever, that we know of,) its population only 2,128, sends two members to Parliament; while Liverpool, with its 282,000, does the same, and no more. Then there are such places as Petersfield, Devizes, Maldon, Marlborough, and Wenlock, which, with a population not exceeding 17,000, send nine members; just as many as Leeds, Birmingham, Manchester, and Liverpool put together, whose population amounts to nearly one million! We proceed no further at present; but we might go on to show similar absurdities, as the catalogue is by no means exhausted. The members who represent these little places are too much like the places themselves—of no consequence: their names are never seen, except in the Division Lists; perhaps voting for their own interests, or those of their patrons.— Wesleyan Chronicle.